ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1770

ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (AAV) in Younger Vs Older Patients:  Comparison of Clinical, Serologic and Outcome Differences and Their Implications for Management

Priya Chokshi1, Olufemi Aina2, Naveed Masani2, Melissa Fazzari3, Elise Belilos1, Kristina Belostocki1, Gary Rosenblum1, Tobin Abraham4, Daniil Shimonov4, Zinal Patel4 and Steven E. Carsons1, 1Rheumatology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, 2Nephrology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, 3Biostatistics, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, 4Medicine, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: ANCA, Elderly, polyangiitis and vasculitis, Wegener's granulomatosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Vasculitis Poster II: ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a cause of multi-organ disease in all ages, but peaks at ages 65-74. Limited data is available on the characteristics of AAV in the elderly. Our aim is to compare clinical and serological presentations, treatment regimens, and survival outcomes between younger and older AAV patients.

Methods:

A retrospective review of patients younger and older than 65yrs [(<65grp); (≥65grp), respectively] diagnosed with AAV was conducted at our institution between 2005 and 2016. Data on demographics, organ system involvement, ANCA-MPO/PR3 serology, BVAS, Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI), 5 Factor Score (FFS) and treatment was recorded. Chi square tests of association and two-sample t-test for group mean differences were used to compare groups. Survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard ratio and Kaplan-Meir estimates.

Results:

The cohort included 93 patients [52% (<65grp); 48% (≥65grp)]. The mean age at diagnosis was 59 ± 20 years (range 16-91). Specifically, the age of the <65grp was 43 ± 14 compared to 76 ± 7 for ≥ 65grp. Median follow-up was 4.6 years in the<65grp and 2.0 years in the 65grp. There were no significant differences in gender, race, BMI, or smoking status. At diagnosis, ≥65grp had 3 times as many comorbidities as <65grp (p <0.0001). The ≥65grp also had more renal involvement (73 vs 50%; p=0.02). The <65grp had more sinus (79 vs 44%; p=0.001) and skin (38 vs 18%; p=0.03) involvement. There were no differences in lung, ocular, neurologic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, constitutional, or hematologic/DVT findings. The elderly were also more likely to be MPO+ (69% MPO vs 31% PR3) whereas the younger were mostly PR3+ (17% MPO vs 83% PR3) (p <0.001).

Twenty percent of ≥65grp was hemodialyzed initially compared to 2 percent of <65grp (p=0.01). There was no difference in use of plasmapheresis, pulse steroids, cyclophosphamide (CYC) or rituximab (RTX). However, over the course of their illness, 21% of <65grp received both CYC and RTX vs none of the ≥65grp (p<0.001).

Although there was no significant difference between BVAS at presentation or VDI, the FFS at presentation was 2 times greater in the ≥65grp vs <65grp group (p<.0001). Interestingly, although both the mortality and FFS were increased in the ≥65grp, when this data was adjusted for age, the FFS did not have a significant association with the hazard of death (p=0.67) in the elderly. Although relapse was higher in the <65grp (56 vs 27%; p =0.0115), mortality was greater in the ≥65grp (98 vs 63%, p<0.001). There were no differences in complications.

Conclusion:

Our data indicate that clinical manifestations of AAV differ with age at presentation. There is also a striking age-related difference in distribution of ANCA subtype. While relapse was higher in younger patients, mortality was greater in the ≥65grp, possibly due to higher co-morbidity at presentation. A better understanding of the characteristic pattern of presentation between younger and older patients with AAV may have implications for appropriate management and help improve outcomes in this cohort of patients.


Disclosure: P. Chokshi, None; O. Aina, None; N. Masani, None; M. Fazzari, None; E. Belilos, None; K. Belostocki, None; G. Rosenblum, None; T. Abraham, None; D. Shimonov, None; Z. Patel, None; S. E. Carsons, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chokshi P, Aina O, Masani N, Fazzari M, Belilos E, Belostocki K, Rosenblum G, Abraham T, Shimonov D, Patel Z, Carsons SE. ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (AAV) in Younger Vs Older Patients:  Comparison of Clinical, Serologic and Outcome Differences and Their Implications for Management [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anca-associated-vasculitis-aav-in-younger-vs-older-patients-comparison-of-clinical-serologic-and-outcome-differences-and-their-implications-for-management/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anca-associated-vasculitis-aav-in-younger-vs-older-patients-comparison-of-clinical-serologic-and-outcome-differences-and-their-implications-for-management/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology