ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2224

Analgesic Potential of NEO6860, a Modality Selective TRPV1 Antagonist, in Osteoarthritis Knee Pain:  Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Trial

Pierre Arsenault1, Richard Leff2, Nathaniel Katz3, Philippe Walker4 and Dan Chiche4, 1Diex Recherche Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 2Richard L Leff LLC, Chadds Ford, PA, 3Analgesic Solutions, Natick, MA, 4NEOMED Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: osteoarthritis and pain management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Pain – Basic and Clinical Aspects Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Current treatments of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, such as NSAIDs, have significant limitations in both efficacy and safety. NEO6860 is a modality selective antagonist (shows full antagonism when activated by capsaicin, but little or no antagonism when activated by heat or low pH) at the cloned human transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1 (TRPV1) receptor. In a phase I study1, NEO6860 showed good bioavailability and demonstration of pharmacodynamic effect as well as a target engagement.

Methods: This proof-of-concept, randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled, 3-period crossover, phase II study compared alternately 1 day (2 doses): NEO6860 (500 mg bid), placebo, and naproxen (500 mg bid) in a random sequence in 54 patients with OA (mean age: 61; mean BMI 29 kg/m2; 35% with hypertension, 14% with dyslipidemia and 10% with diabetes).

Results:

Pharmacokinetics (PK) data revealed that the exposure was approximately 1.6 times higher when compared with phase I at the same dose (Cmax = 4337 ng/mL and 2770 ng/mL, respectively). An analgesic effect of NEO6860 was shown using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) post-exercise at 3 and 24h, using a mixed ANCOVA Model, controlling for Period, Sequence and Treatment as fixed effects and baseline by period as covariate:

Least-squares-means (95% CI)

Change in NRS from baseline to

NEO6860 (N=52)

Naproxen (N=52)

Placebo (N=50)

3 hours post-dose, Mean (95%CI)

-0.56 (-0.94 ; -0.19)

-0.7 (-1.09 ; -0.34)

-0.38 (-0.75 ; -0.00)

8 hours post-dose, Mean (95%CI)*

-0.57 (-0.95 ; -0.20)

-0.65 (-1.02 ; -0.27)

-0.83 (-1.20 ; -0.46)

24 hours post-dose, Mean (95%CI)

-0.67 (-1.09 ; -0.26)

-0.97**(-1.39 ; -0.55)

-0.29**(-0.71 ; 0.13)

*: 8 h post dose was the primary endpoint; **: p <0.05 comparing naproxen to placebo.

This pattern was confirmed on NRS pre-exercise, Patient’s Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and, to a lesser extent, the WOMAC; however, the observed effect was below the hypothesis used for power estimate, explaining in part the P values ≥ 0.05. The safety profile was comparable to that in the prior phase I study, taking into consideration the unexpectedly higher level of exposure, and the two severe adverse events (AEs) reported (feeling hot and headache, each reported by one patient) were resolved within one day. Importantly, no hyperthermia and no change in heat pain perception were reported.

Conclusion:

In patients with OA pain, an analgesic effect was observed with NEO6860 while not showing the two AEs previously observed with TRPV1 antagonist, consistent with its modality selective mode of action. Future investigations should emphasize on: 1- reducing the NEO6860 dose, which may maintain the analgesic effect with multiple dosing, and 2- testing NEO6860 in combination with NSAIDs to improve analgesia and potentially alleviate safety concerns of current treatments of OA.

(1) Brown W et al. The Journal of Pain, 2017 June; 18(6):726-738.


Disclosure: P. Arsenault, NEOMED paid consulting fees, 5; R. Leff, NEOMED paid consulting fees, 5; N. Katz, NEOMED paid consulting fees, 5; P. Walker, NEOMED Institute, 3; D. Chiche, NEOMED Institute, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Arsenault P, Leff R, Katz N, Walker P, Chiche D. Analgesic Potential of NEO6860, a Modality Selective TRPV1 Antagonist, in Osteoarthritis Knee Pain:  Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/analgesic-potential-of-neo6860-a-modality-selective-trpv1-antagonist-in-osteoarthritis-knee-pain-results-of-a-randomized-controlled-proof-of-concept-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/analgesic-potential-of-neo6860-a-modality-selective-trpv1-antagonist-in-osteoarthritis-knee-pain-results-of-a-randomized-controlled-proof-of-concept-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology