ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 214

Anakinra Compared to Prednisone on the Treatment of Acute CPPD Crystal Arthritis, a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study

Alexandre Dumusc1, Borbala Pazar Maldonado1, Charles Benaim2, Isabelle Fabreguet1, Pascal Zufferey1, Bérengère Aubry-Rozier1 and Alexander So1, 1Rheumatology Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Anakinra, crystal-induced arthritis and prednisolone, IL-1, prednisone, RCT

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies - Poster I: Clinical Practice

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   Calcium pyrophosphate crystal-induced arthritis (CPPD) is an acute crystal arthritis, frequently involving the wrist or the knee. Monosodium urate in gout or CPPD in pseudogout have been shown to trigger the release of IL-1β, a strong pro-inflammatory cytokine, through a complex intracellular molecular cascade. IL-1 blockade showed efficacy in treating acute gouty arthritis in phase 3 controlled studies, and there are published retrospectives series and case reports showing a good clinical response in CPPD arthritis in blocking IL-1 with anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist. This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra versus prednisone to treat acute CPPD arthritis.

Methods:   Single center, randomized, double blinded controlled study. ISRCTN registration number: ISRCTN46471047. Patients presenting, between 2012 and 2015, with an acute CPPD arthritis (< 5 days duration), were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a treatment of anakinra 100 mg s.c. + placebo matching prednisone or prednisone 30 mg + placebo matching anakinra s.c. for 3 days. Acute CPPD arthritis was defined as presence of clinical symptoms and CPPD crystals in joint fluid aspiration at screening or in the medical history. Primary outcome was the pain evaluation at 72 hours post dose on a 0-100 mm VAS scale. Secondary outcomes were assessments by the patient and physician of pain intensity and global response over a 28 days period.

Results: Fifteen patients were randomized, 8 assigned to anakinra and 7 assigned to prednisone treatment. Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. Three patients (2 in the anakinra group and 1 in the prednisone group) presented a flare 2 weeks after the intervention and were excluded from the study, treated with medication not allowed by the protocol (including open label treatment with anakinra for 1 patient). The study was stopped after 3 years due to a persistent low inclusion rate, reaching only 30% of the 50 expected randomized patients, mainly linked to the short requested delay of symptoms duration for inclusion. Pain reduction at 72 hours on a VAS scale compared with baseline was statistically significant in the anakinra group (-39 mm, p=0.02) but not statistically significant in the prednisone group (-23 mm, p=0.07). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups concerning the primary outcome. All other outcome measures were in favour of the anakinra group, but without being statistically significant due to an underpowered study. No serious adverse events were observed in both groups.

Conclusion:   Both anakinra and prednisone seem to be effective in the treatment of acute CPPD-induced arthritis and we observed a trend in favour of anakinra, but non statistically significant, due to an underpowered study. More prospective randomized controlled trials are needed with more patients, probably with a multicentric design.


Disclosure: A. Dumusc, None; B. Pazar Maldonado, None; C. Benaim, None; I. Fabreguet, None; P. Zufferey, None; B. Aubry-Rozier, None; A. So, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,Sobi, 5,Menarini, 5,AstraZeneca, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dumusc A, Pazar Maldonado B, Benaim C, Fabreguet I, Zufferey P, Aubry-Rozier B, So A. Anakinra Compared to Prednisone on the Treatment of Acute CPPD Crystal Arthritis, a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anakinra-compared-to-prednisone-on-the-treatment-of-acute-cppd-crystal-arthritis-a-randomized-controlled-double-blind-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anakinra-compared-to-prednisone-on-the-treatment-of-acute-cppd-crystal-arthritis-a-randomized-controlled-double-blind-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology