ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 333

An Assessment of  Bone Health and Fracture Risk in a Bariatric Surgery Population at an Urban Medical Center

Sherilyn Diomampo1, Leila Muhieddine2, Ann Igoe3, Charles Thomas4 and Sobia Hassan1, 1Rheumatology, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 2Internal Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 3Medicine-Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 4Research, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease – Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis - Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity.1,2 Increased bone resorption has been demonstrated after bariatric surgery.3 However, there have been limited and conflicting reports as to the prevalence of osteoporosis and occurrence of fractures after surgery.3,4 Existing clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient recommend checking pre- and post-operative vitamin D and post-operative PTH among other tests. Furthermore, bone density measurements is recommended at 2 years post-surgery. 5 This study aimed to describe the incidence of significant bone loss and fractures in the post-bariatric surgery population in an urban medical center. In addition, it also aimed to assess whether our physicians were following current practice guidelines for the monitoring of bone health in bariatric patients.


 

Methods:   This retrospective observational study included chart review (SD, LM, AI) from electronic medical records. Patients who had undergone bariatric surgery at MetroHealth Medical Center since January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2015 were identified by ICD-9 code gastric bypass 43664 and 43665, sleeve gastrectomy 43775 and gastric banding 43770, and were included in the study. Data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). The following data were reviewed: demographics; date and type of bariatric procedure; pre- and post-surgery vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), C-terminal telopeptide (CTX), N-terminal telopeptide (NTX) and bone alkaline phosphatase; bone density survey [Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)] dates & results; and fractures if any, including type (fragility or traumatic) and location. Descriptive analyses were performed and included measures of central tendency (mean and median) and variability (standard deviation, minimum and maximum). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess statistical significance between certain distributions such as race and body mass index (BMI) or vitamin D levels.


Results:   Five hundred twenty-three patients were included in the study. There were 437 females and 86 males, with a mean age of 45.39; 48.76% were identified as White and 39.77% were identified as African-American (Table 1). The most common surgical procedure was gastric bypass 80.31%, followed by sleeve gastrectomy 16.63%, and gastric banding 3.06%. Average days of patient follow-up after bariatric surgery were 1162 days. Pre-surgical mean BMI was 48.98 kg/m2, with African-Americans having a significantly greater BMI than Whites and Hispanics (p = 0.0009). Post-surgical weight loss median percent difference was 22.60% loss 6 months after surgery, 29.96% 12 months after surgery, and 26.12% at 3 or more years after surgery. Vitamin D was checked in 83.4% of patients before surgery, but was only checked in 41.87% of patients within 1 year after surgery. Vitamin D levels were within normal range (30.0 – 100.0 ng/mL) up to 1 year after surgery for patients who have had their levels checked. There was no significant difference in post-surgical vitamin D levels among races (p = 0.1770). PTH was checked in only 6.70% of patients 6 months after surgery, and in only 5.16% at 1 year post-surgery. CTX, NTX and bone alkaline phosphatase were rarely measured. Only 19 patients (3.63%) had DXA prior to surgery. Eleven patients (2.10%) had DXA within 2 years after surgery, and 16 patients (3.06%) had DXA more than 2 years after surgery. Four of the 19 patients who had DXA pre-surgery had repeat scans post-surgery (1 within 2 years, and 3 after 2 years), all showed significant bone mineral density (BMD) decrease (Table 2). Only 10 fractures were observed in the study; 3 were fragility and 7 were traumatic. Mean time to fracture for those who had a fragility fracture was 4.93 years. The location of the 3 fragility fractures were the wrist (n=1) and fibula (n=2). All of the 3 patients underwent gastric bypass procedure.


Conclusion:   There is considerable discrepancy between current physician practice at our urban medical center and recommended clinical practice guidelines for bone health monitoring in the bariatric population. Vitamin D, PTH and DXA were infrequently checked in our bariatric surgery patients. In the few patients who had pre- and post-operative bone density measurements, significant bone loss was observed. Despite this large survey of bariatric patients, there is a low incidence of fractures post-bariatric surgery over a follow up time of 3 years.    

Demographics (n=523) Age (Mean): 45.39 N Observed Percent Sex Female Male   437 86   83.56 16.44 Race White Black Hispanic Unavailable/ Declined   255 208 31 29   48.76 39.77 5.93 5.54

Table 1. Patient demographics          

Location N observed BMD Change Hip Within 2 years After 2 years   0 1     0.217 Lumbar spine Within 2 years After 2 years   0 1     0.100 Radius Within 2 years After 2 years   1 1   0.058 0.142

Table 2: Bone mineral density changes by location. Least significant change with GE Lunar: spine 0.018g/cm2, and femur and forearm 0.036g/cm2; all changes were significant.     References 1Chang S_H, Stoll CRT, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149(3):275-87. 2 Sjostrom L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, et al. Bariatric surgery, long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012. 307(1):56-65. 3Lalmohamed A, De Vries F, Bazelier M, et al. Risk of fracture after bariatric surgery in the United Kingdom: population-based, retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2012;345:e5085. 4Nakamura KM, Haglind EGC, Clowes JA, et al. Fracture risk following bariatric surgery: a population-based study. Osteoporosis Int. 2014;25(1):151-8. 5Mechanick J, Youdim A, Jones D, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative, nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient- 2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Endocrine Practice 2013;19(2):e1-36.


Disclosure: S. Diomampo, None; L. Muhieddine, None; A. Igoe, None; C. Thomas, None; S. Hassan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Diomampo S, Muhieddine L, Igoe A, Thomas C, Hassan S. An Assessment of  Bone Health and Fracture Risk in a Bariatric Surgery Population at an Urban Medical Center [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/an-assessment-of-bone-health-and-fracture-risk-in-a-bariatric-surgery-population-at-an-urban-medical-center/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/an-assessment-of-bone-health-and-fracture-risk-in-a-bariatric-surgery-population-at-an-urban-medical-center/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology