ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 857

Amelioration of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in NZM 2328 Mice By Selectively Blocking Engagement of Two BAFF Receptors

Chaim O. Jacob, Ning Yu and William Stohl, Division of Rheumatology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: BAFF, BR3, TACI and mouse model

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Animal Models

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: BAFF, a potent B cell survival factor, is an established therapeutic target in SLE, with the anti-BAFF antibody, belimumab, being FDA-approved for the treatment of SLE. Nevertheless, large percentages of SLE patients failed to respond to belimumab in the seminal phase-III trials, pointing to an ongoing large unmet therapeutic need. Inhibition of one or more of the individual BAFF receptors (BCMA, TACI, BR3) may, in principle, be more efficacious than global inhibition of BAFF. Indeed, whereas the contribution of BAFF to SLE has been the subject of substantial investigation, the contributions of the individual BAFF receptors to SLE have undergone only limited investigation to date. In the SLE-prone NZM 2328 (NZM) mouse model, NZM mice singly-deficient in any BAFF receptor develop clinical SLE with a time course indistinguishable from that of NZM wild-type (WT) mice, demonstrating sufficient functional redundancy among the BAFF receptors to render any single BAFF receptor dispensable to the development of SLE in these mice. To determine whether elimination of combinations of BAFF receptors could be clinically beneficial, we examined the effect of eliminating discrete pairs of BAFF receptors on the development of disease in NZM mice.

Methods: NZM mice singly-deficient in BCMA, TACI, and BR3 were intercrossed to yield NZM mice deficient two BAFF receptors (NZM.Br3-/-.Bcma-/-, NZM.Br3-/-.Taci-/-, and NZM.Bcma-/-.Taci-/-). These mice were evaluated for BAFF receptor expression and lymphocyte phenotype by flow cytometry, for renal immunopathology by immunofluorescence and histopathology, and for clinical disease by assessment of proteinuria (³3+ by dipstick) and death.

Results: The only BAFF receptor expressed by NZM.Br3-/-.Bcma-/- mice is TACI; the only BAFF receptor expressed by NZM.Br3-/-.Taci-/- mice is BCMA; and the only BAFF receptor expressed by NZM.Bcma-/-.Taci-/- mice is BR3. All B cell subsets are reduced in NZM.Br3-/-.Bcma-/- and NZM.Br3-/-.Taci-/- mice but are increased in NZM.Bcma-/-.Taci-/- mice. All T cell subsets, other than naive CD4+ cells, are reduced in NZM.Br3-/-.Taci-/- mice but are increased in NZM.Bcma-/-.Taci-/- mice. CD4+ memory cells are reduced in NZM.Br3-/-.Bcma-/- mice. Renal immunopathology and clinical disease are significantly delayed and attenuated in NZM.Br3-/-.Bcma-/- and NZM.Br3-/-.Taci-/- mice but are significantly accelerated in NZM.Bcma-/-.Taci-/- mice (Figure 1).

Conclusion: Elimination of both BR3 and TACI (while retaining BCMA) or both BR3 and BCMA (while retaining TACI) markedly inhibits development of SLE in NZM mice. By extension, selective pharmacologic targeting of BR3 + TACI (while preserving BCMA engagement) or BR3 + BCMA (while preserving TACI engagement) may represent a successful therapeutic approach in human SLE.


Disclosure:

C. O. Jacob,
None;

N. Yu,
None;

W. Stohl,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/amelioration-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-in-nzm-2328-mice-by-selectively-blocking-engagement-of-two-baff-receptors/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology