ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1002

Aiming for Remission in Early RA: Impact on Pain during the First Year of Treatment

Ellen Moholt1, Anna-Birgitte Aga1, Inge C Olsen1, Hilde Berner Hammer2, Till Uhlig3, Anne Katrine Kongtorp4, Heidi Lunoe4, Elin Mejdell Styrmoe4, Tore K. Kvien1, Espen A. Haavardsholm1 and the ARCTIC study group, 1Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Dept of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: nurse practitioners, pain, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: ARHP I: Exemplary Abstracts

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Pain is the symptom people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have
prioritized highest for improvement [1]. Treating to target and aiming for remission in early RA may reduce
pain, but there is limited knowledge about the impact of pain in RA patients
classified using the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and treated according to modern
treatment strategies. The objective of this study was to explore and describe
changes in the degree of pain in early RA during the first year after starting
treatment with DMARDs.

 

Methods: Patients
from 11 rheumatology centers who fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification
criteria for RA, with symptom duration (from first swollen joint) less than 2
years, and were DMARD naïve with indication for DMARD treatment, were followed
for 1 year. Treatment target was remission, and DMARD was prescribed according
to international recommendations. Pain was recorded on a Visual Analog Scale
(VAS 0-100 mm) at every visit, and grouped according to Jensen et al. [2] with cut points for no pain set at 0-4
mm, mild 5-44 mm, moderate 45-74 mm and severe pain 75-100 mm. Short Form 36
(SF-36) bodily pain was recorded, and transformed to a scale from 0-100, where
high score indicates low bodily pain.

 

Results: A
total of 205 early RA patients were included: 61.5% female, 82.4% ACPA positive,
mean (SD) age 52.2 (13.4) years. At initiation of DMARD treatment the mean
(SD) 44-swollen joint count was 10.2 (7.2), Ritchie Articular Index 8.14 (6.5),
ESR 24 (19) mm/hr and Patient Global Assessment 49 (24) mm. DAS was mean (SD) 3.4
(1.1): 20.1% were in low DAS, 47.1% in moderate DAS and 32.8% in high DAS. VAS pain
at baseline was median (IQR) 45 (27-68) mm, and decreased to 12 (4-27) mm after
1 month, and after 1 year to 6 (2-20) mm; see fig. 1A for details.  Mean (SD) SF-36
bodily pain at baseline was 40 (21),  and 73 (23) after 1 year. At baseline
less than 3% of patients reported no pain, after 3/6/12 months this proportion
increased to 27/32/41%, and after 12 months more than 87% of patients reported
either mild or no pain (fig. 1B).

 

Conclusion: In
this cohort of early DMARD-naïve RA patients treated according to modern
treatment strategies aiming for remission, there was a significant reduction of
pain after 1 month, and pain is decreased further during 12 months follow-up.
Early intervention and treating to target in this population fulfills the
patients’ prioritized goal of minimizing pain, leading to a decreased burden of
pain in RA.

Image/graph: Figure 1A. VAS pain 0-100 mm median and
interquartile range

Figure 1B. VAS pain group proportion at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months.

 

References:

1.         Heiberg, T. et al. Arthritis Care Res 2002.

2.         Jensen, M.P. et al. The Journal of Pain, 2003.  


Disclosure: E. Moholt, None; A. B. Aga, None; I. C. Olsen, None; H. B. Hammer, None; T. Uhlig, None; A. K. Kongtorp, None; H. Lunoe, None; E. Mejdell Styrmoe, None; T. K. Kvien, None; E. A. Haavardsholm, AbbVie, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,MSD, 2,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2,UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Moholt E, Aga AB, Olsen IC, Hammer HB, Uhlig T, Kongtorp AK, Lunoe H, Mejdell Styrmoe E, Kvien TK, Haavardsholm EA. Aiming for Remission in Early RA: Impact on Pain during the First Year of Treatment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/aiming-for-remission-in-early-ra-impact-on-pain-during-the-first-year-of-treatment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/aiming-for-remission-in-early-ra-impact-on-pain-during-the-first-year-of-treatment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology