ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2322

Aim for Better Gout Control: A Retrospective Analysis of Preventable Hospital Admissions for Gout

Tarun S. Sharma1, Thomas M. Harrington2 and Thomas P. Olenginski2, 1Rheumatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, 2Dept of Rheumatology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Gout and quality

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: ACR/EULAR guidelines have been published on the management of gout. Despite these guidelines, many patients with gout suffer recurrent flares and hospitalizations resulting in poor disease control and increased health care utilization. We aim to analyze the hospitalizations related to gout, determine whether these admissions were preventable and calculate imputed hospitalization costs.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of adult patients hospitalized at our institution with a primary discharge diagnosis of gout (defined as ICD-9 274, 275 or 712) from 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2013 was constructed (n=79). The primary diagnoses were validated and preventable admissions ascertained on chart review. A preventable admission was defined as an admission where the primary admitting diagnosis was a mono or polyarthritis subsequently diagnosed as gout on hospitalization and without any concomitant illness on presentation warranting admission. We reported demographic characteristics, including clinical diagnosis on admission, prior history of gout, possible risk factors for gout (Diabetes, Cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, diuretic or low dose aspirin use), gout medications, serum uric acid levels within 1 year prior to admission, timing of arthrocentesis, if done, surgical procedures performed and hospitalization costs.

Results: Fifty six (56) of 79 patients were found to have adjudicated primary diagnosis of gout. Of these 56 gout admissions, 50 (89%) met the definition of preventable admission. On admission, the clinical diagnosis was septic arthritis (76%), inflammatory polyarthritis (14%) or cellulitis (8%). Of the 50 preventable admissions, 33 patients underwent arthrocentesis, 24 of which were performed in the Emergency Room.  Thirty-five (35) patients (70%) had a previous history of gout and 21 (42%) had ≥3 risk factors for gout. Of the 35 patients with a prior history of gout, 74% were managed by primary care, whereas 26% were being managed by rheumatology. Of the 26 patients managed by family physicians, 8 (31%) were on urate lowering therapy (ULT) and 5 (19%) were on colchicine prophylaxis.  Twenty three serum uric acid levels within 1 year of the date of hospitalization were recorded of which 18 (78%) were not at goal of <6 mg/dL. Of 15 patients on long term gout treatment, 33% were non-compliant. Three (3) patients underwent orthopedic procedures: toe amputation (1), arthroscopic debridement (2) and were subsequently diagnosed as gout.

Total additive length of stay for the preventable admissions was 171 days (mean 3.42 days). Total hospitalization-related-costs were $208,000 with average cost per admission of $4160.

Conclusion: We conclude that 89% of the hospitalizations with primary diagnosis of gout were preventable. Defined gaps in clinical care include: ACR/EULAR guidelines not followed, lack of crystal-confirmed diagnoses, patients presenting to emergency room for care, and medication non-compliance. Consequently, this population incurred unnecessary health care costs in the emergency room and costly and preventable admission care expenditures. Steps to reassess the care of gout at our institution have begun as a direct result of these study findings. 

 


Disclosure:

T. S. Sharma,
None;

T. M. Harrington,
None;

T. P. Olenginski,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/aim-for-better-gout-control-a-retrospective-analysis-of-preventable-hospital-admissions-for-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology