ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1531

Agreement Between Disease Activity States and Improvement Scores As Defined by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Cut-Off Values

Dilek Solmaz, Pinar Cetin, Ismail Sari, Merih Birlik, Servet Akar, Fatos Onen and Nurullah Akkoc, Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Activity score and ankylosing spondylitis (AS)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment: II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

BASDAI has been extensively used to assess disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) BASDAI score ≥4 represent high disease activity and has been suggested as an eligibility criterion for initiation of anti-TNF therapy.ASDAS is a new composite clinical tool to assess disease activity in AS. ASDAS values of 2.1 and 3.5 have been selected as cut-off values to define high and very high disease activity, respectively and ASDAS ≥ 2.1 has been proposed as a suitable cut-off for eligibility for anti-TNF therapy The aim of this study was to estimate the corresponding BASDAI and ASDAS cut-off values for initiation of anti-TNF therapy and to assess the agreement between disease activity states defined by BASDAI and ASDAS values

Methods:

Patients with complete baseline data for ASDAS based on CRP and BASDAI were included. Mean ASDAS and BASDAI values were compared by Spearman correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the cut-off value of ASDAS that correspond to BASDAI score of 4 and to asses the cut-off value of BASDAI that correspond to ASDAS values of 2.1 and 3.5 Each cut-off point was calculated on the basis of the best trade-off values between sensitivity and specificity. The Kappa statistic was used to test the agreement between the disease activity states according to ASDAS and BASDAI, as well as the agreement between the clinical improvement as assessed by the two instruments (for patients with available data)

Results:

396 patients (291 M; 44 ±12.0) were identified with complete data at baseline Mean disease duration was 9.4 ± 8.2.Mean BASDAI, and ASDAS scores were 3.6 ± 2.3 and 2.9 ± 1.1 There was good correlation between ASDAS and BASDAI when tested by Spearman (p<0.001; r=0.9). The best trade-off ASDAS value corresponding to BASDAI score of 4 was 2.9 (80% sensitivity and 77% specificity; AUC: 0.88) whereas the best trade-off BASDAI values corresponding to ASDAS≥2.1 and ≥3.5 were 2.4 (84% sensitivity and 83% specificity; AUC: 0.90) and 3.7 (89% sensitivity and 69% specificity; AUC: 0.87), respectively. Similar cut-off values were obtained for different gender and age groups(≤40 / >40 years).Overall percent agreement of BASDAI≥4with ASDAS≥2.1 and ASDAS≥ 3.5were 67 and 76%, with κ valuesof 0.39 and 0.48, respectively. There was a moderate agreement between both the major clinical response measured by BASDAI50 and that by ΔASDAS≥2 (κ=0.441) and the minimal clinical improvement as measured by ΔBASDAI≥ 2and  ΔASDAS≥1.1 (κ=0.545) 

Conclusion:

The ASDAS value that corresponds to the recommended BASDAI cut-off ≥4 for initiation of anti-TNF therapy is higher than the recommended ASDAS threshold of ≥ 2.1. Agreement between high disease activity states as defined by BASDAI and that by ASDAS is only fair, whereas agreement between clinical response as measured by BASDAI and that by ASDAS seems to be better.

Table1: Agreement between BASDAI≥4and high and very high disease activity states according to ASDAS

 

ASDAS

<2.1

≥2.1

<3.5

≥3.5

Total

BASDAI

<4

99

129

211

17

228

≥4

1

167

78

90

168

Total

100

296

289

107

396


Disclosure:

D. Solmaz,
None;

P. Cetin,
None;

I. Sari,
None;

M. Birlik,
None;

S. Akar,
None;

F. Onen,
None;

N. Akkoc,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/agreement-between-disease-activity-states-and-improvement-scores-as-defined-by-bath-ankylosing-spondylitis-disease-activity-index-and-ankylosing-spondylitis-disease-activity-score-cut-off-va/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology