ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2658

Adverse Drug Reactions Due to Disease Modifying Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Zulema Rosales Rosado1,2, Judit Font Urgelles1, Dalifer Freites Núñez1, Cynthia Milagros León Cárdenas1, Cristina Lajas Petisco1, Leticia Leon2, Luis Rodriguez Rodriguez2, Juan A Jover Jover1 and Lydia Abásolo Alcázar2, 1Rheumatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain, 2Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Clinical practice, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, longitudinal studies and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Safety issues

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  There is a high risk of developing adverse drug reactions (ADR) in rheumatology due, mainly, to the Disease Modifying Drugs (DMARD) used. After more than twenty years using DMARD, is widely known their efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but it is necessary to increase our knowledge of its ADR, especially those that lead to discontinuation in real life. The purpuse of our study was to describe the incidence rate and characteristics of moderate and severe ADR to DMARD in patients with RA.

Methods:  Observational longitudinal study was conducted. Recent onset RA patients diagnosed between April 15th 2007 and 31st December 2010 followed in outpatient clinic at Hospital Clinico San Carlos until December 31st2015, which used any DMARD treatment were included. Primary outcome: development of an ADR that required discontinuation of the DMARD (moderate: discontinuation of the drug; severe: discontinuation and hospitalization or death as a result of the ADR). Incidence rates of discontinuation (IR) per 100 patient-years were estimated using survival techniques with their respective 95% confidence interval [CI].

Results:  We included 293 courses of DMARD treatment in 97 patients (815 patient-years). Of these, 78% were women with a mean age at diagnosis of 55.6 ± 15 years. The median time to the start of the first DMARD was 0[0-41] days. 11.5% were taking biological DMARDs, 60.75% were using combined therapy and 86% were taking corticoids. Treatment was suspended due to ADRs in 110 cases (IR: 13.5 [11.2 -16.3]), being gastrointestinal the most frequent cause (21.4%), followed by infections (15.2%). The IR of moderate ADR was 11.2[9.2-13.8], being 11.1[8-15] for monotherapy regimen and 11.4 [8.8-14.9] for combined therapy. The IR of discontinuation related to synthetic and biological DMARDs was 13.2 [0.9-16.2] and 15.6 [8.6-28.2] respectively. The crude IR of discontinuation for moderate ADRs was higher for Gold (IR: 19.5[11.5-32.9]) and Leflunomide (IR: 20.5[10.7-39.5]) being 7.14 [4.8-10.4] for Methotrexate (MTX). 17.5% of the ADR were severe (n=20) with an IR of 2.5[1.6-3.8] being infections the most frequent cause (65%) followed by cancer (20%), gastrointestinal (10%) and exitus (n=1). The crude IR of discontinuation for severe ADRs was higher for biological DMARDs (IR: 4.2[1.3-13.2]) than for synthetic DMARDs (2.28 [1.4-3.6]). The crude IR of discontinuation for severe ADRs was the lowest for Antimalarials (IR: 1.5[0.5-4.8]) and MTX (IR: 1.3[0.5-3.1]. Regarding types of regimen, the IR of severe ADR on monotherapy was 1.5 [0.6-3.5], and with combined therapy was 3.1[1.8-5.1], being higher when we looked at triple therapy (IR: 4.5 [2.4-8.3]).

Conclusion: This study describes the incidence of ADRs occurred in RA patients taking DMARDs in real life conditions. The IR of ADR estimated was 13.5% patient-years, being 2.5% patient-years for severe ones. MTX was the drug with the lowest IR of ADRs. Regarding severe ADRs caution might be taken for those patients on triple therapy.


Disclosure: Z. Rosales Rosado, None; J. Font Urgelles, None; D. Freites Núñez, None; C. M. León Cárdenas, None; C. Lajas Petisco, None; L. Leon, None; L. Rodriguez Rodriguez, None; J. A. Jover Jover, None; L. Abásolo Alcázar, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rosales Rosado Z, Font Urgelles J, Freites Núñez D, León Cárdenas CM, Lajas Petisco C, Leon L, Rodriguez Rodriguez L, Jover Jover JA, Abásolo Alcázar L. Adverse Drug Reactions Due to Disease Modifying Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adverse-drug-reactions-due-to-disease-modifying-drugs-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adverse-drug-reactions-due-to-disease-modifying-drugs-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology