ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2745

Adult Axial Spondyloarthritis Screening and Referral Practices Amongst Primary Care Physicians, Physiotherapists, Chiropractors and Nurse Practitioners:  Results from a Qualitative Study

Laura Passalent1,2, Leslie Soever2,3, Kathleen Bednis1, Christopher Hawke1,4, Andrew Bidos5,6, Jeff Bloom7,8, Y. Raja Rampersaud6,8, Nigil Haroon9,10 and Robert D Inman8,9, 1Allied Health, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3MSK, Geriatrics and Cardiac Rehab Programs, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Health Quality Programs - ISAEC, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Family Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 9Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Spondylitis Clinic, Toronto, ON, Canada, 10Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: axial spondyloarthritis, primary care and qualitative, Referrals

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  For the axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) population, early recognition is crucial in preventing major morbidity. Despite this, there exists an unacceptably long delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis, with an average wait time of 8 years between the commencement of back pain and time when patients are diagnosed by a rheumatologist. Compounding this issue is the uncertainty that exists with respect to initial screening and referral practices amongst primary care practitioners for adults with suspected axial SpA. The purpose of this study was to explore the screening and referral practices for suspected axial SpA in adults with chronic back pain amongst primary care physicians (PCPs), physiotherapists (PTs), chiropractors (DCs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) working in community practice in the province of Ontario, Canada.

Methods:  Semi-structured key informant (KI) interviews were conducted with PCPs, PTs, DCs and NPs working in community practice. Interviews were conducted with KIs to address: 1) screening practices for axial SpA; and 2) referral practices for adults with suspected axial SpA. Interviews were conducted in-person or over the telephone. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a compare and contrast analysis by coding groups of words that addressed the research objectives. Two members of the research team undertook this exercise independent of each other and then met to reconcile an understanding of emergent themes. Groups of words with similar meaning were organized into themes. The themes were organized into two main categories: Screening Practices and Referral Practices. NVIVO V9 was used to assist with organization of codes.

Results:  A total of 17 interviews were conducted: PCPs (5); PTs (3); DCs (6) and NPs (3). Practice locations for KIs were primarily urban (14 urban; 3 rural). Mean years of practice of key informants was 9.3 years (range, 1-22 years). Overall, 3 themes were identified related to Screening Practices for axial SpA: 1) knowledge of clinical manifestations of axial SpA; 2) role of investigations in early diagnosis, and 3) lack of awareness of assessment guidelines and screening tools. Themes related to Referral Practices included: 1) optimization of technology; 2) referral barriers, and 3) legislative hurdles.

Conclusion:  Most primary care practitioners had a general understanding of the clinical manifestations of axial SpA; however, knowledge deficits existed related to rare clinical presentations and the role of investigations in early identification of the disease. With respect to referral practices, there are opportunities to address system-level barriers, including more extensive use of technology (e.g. use of online consultations and electronic referral templates). Our research has identified a number of opportunities for implementation of quality improvement initiatives and indication for collaboration with policy makers and other stakeholders, including patients. These results may be incorporated into a wider research initiative to gain better insight into primary care screening and referral practices for adults with suspected axial SpA.


Disclosure: L. Passalent, None; L. Soever, None; K. Bednis, None; C. Hawke, None; A. Bidos, None; J. Bloom, None; Y. R. Rampersaud, None; N. Haroon, None; R. D. Inman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Passalent L, Soever L, Bednis K, Hawke C, Bidos A, Bloom J, Rampersaud YR, Haroon N, Inman RD. Adult Axial Spondyloarthritis Screening and Referral Practices Amongst Primary Care Physicians, Physiotherapists, Chiropractors and Nurse Practitioners:  Results from a Qualitative Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adult-axial-spondyloarthritis-screening-and-referral-practices-amongst-primary-care-physicians-physiotherapists-chiropractors-and-nurse-practitioners-results-from-a-qualitative-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adult-axial-spondyloarthritis-screening-and-referral-practices-amongst-primary-care-physicians-physiotherapists-chiropractors-and-nurse-practitioners-results-from-a-qualitative-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology