ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1918

Adoption Of New Electronic Medical Records May Inhibit Documentation Of Physician Quality Reporting System

Minzi Chen, William E. Davis, Austin Fraser, Jerald M. Zakem, Eve Scopelitis, Kismet Collins, MD, Tamika A. Webb-Detiege and Robert Quinet, Rheumatology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: documentation, Electronic Health Record, low back pain and quality measures

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   Lower back pain (LBP) is a common complaint in the general population and accounts for 2.5% of all outpatient office visits. Critical assessment and documentation of the clinical features of LBP are essential for accurate diagnosis and proper care. Medicare has established physician quality reporting system (PQRS) guidelines for back pain. An incentive is given to clinicians who successfully report 3 or more PQRS measurements for a minimum of 50-80% applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients from January 1 to December 31. Clinicians not compliant with reporting system will receive a service penalty that will be applied in 2015. Electronic medical records (EMR) are promoted as tools for performance improvement. We investigated the impact of education and conversion to a comprehensive EMR (EPIC) on physicians’ documentation and compliance with the quality reporting system guidelines.

Methods:   We initiated a performance improvement project by retrospectively reviewing 100 charts (20 from each of 5 clinicians) for Medicare PQRS guidelines for low back pain. Content of the PQRS documentation assessed includes initial comprehensive assessment using standardized assessment tools for pain, functioning status, warning signs, prior treatment response and employment status, physical examination including straight leg raise and neurological exam, advice for normal activities, and advice against bed rest. Results were reviewed with the clinicians, in conjunction with a didactic review of the PQRS guidelines. A comprehensive EMR system (EPIC) was launched shortly after the first chart review. Subsequently, 100 (20 from each of 5 physicians) charts were reviewed to measure change in documentation. An additional plan-do-study-act cycle was performed after working with the software development team to embed PQRS measurement guidelines within the EMR system.

Results:   The overall percentage for prior lecture documentation was 36.75%, post lecture and EMR/EPIC system implementation was 19.59%. The compliance rate for pre-lecture comprehensive initial assessment was 34%, physical exam 46%, advice for normal activity 55%, and advice against bed rest 12%. The post-lecture/EMR comprehensive initial assessment was 23.3%, physical exam 27.5%, advice for normal activity 23.95%, and advice against bed rest 3.61%. Documentation declined significantly after education and EPIC implementation. A standard template for documentation (“smartphrase”) was developed to facilitate physician documentation. The impact of this EMR enhancement on documentation is being measured and will be reported.

Conclusion:   Initial implementation of the EMR had a significant negative impact on physician documentation of back pain for PQRS reporting in spite of physician education.  An electronic template with built in PQRS guidelines may improve physician documentation and quality of care.


Disclosure:

M. Chen,
None;

W. E. Davis,
None;

A. Fraser,
None;

J. M. Zakem,
None;

E. Scopelitis,
None;

K. Collins, MD,
None;

T. A. Webb-Detiege,
None;

R. Quinet,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adoption-of-new-electronic-medical-records-may-inhibit-documentation-of-physician-quality-reporting-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology