ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2316

Adherence to Denosumab in a Large Healthcare System

Robert A. Overman1, Julie C. Lauffenburger2, Margaret L. Gourlay3 and Chad L. Deal4, 1Eshelman School of Pharmacy - Division of Pharmaceutical Policy and Outcomes, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 3Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 4Dept of Rheum & Imm Dis /A 50, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Big data, denosumab, observation and prescribing trends

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Oral bisphosphonates adherence has been reported as less than 50% at one year. Adherence to denosumab has been reported to be higher than alendronate in several clinical trials. We evaluated adherence rates for denosumab, an anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) administered in office as an injection every six months, by rheumatologists in a large healthcare system.

Methods: We identified new denosumab users using billing data between June 2010 and October 2013 based on HCPCS code J0897 or J3590 with denosumab as the listed biologic. Patients had at least 183 days (6 months) follow-up and were administratively censored at two years post-denosumab initiation, for death, or on 6/1/2014 (end of study period). These data were linked to electronic medical record data and only included patients who had at least two office visits in a rheumatology clinic. Patient characteristics were assessed prior to first administration. Adherence to denosumab was assessed with proportion of days covered (PDC) based on a 183 day coverage period (dosing interval for denosumab). After initiation, PDC was calculated at a maximum of one and two years or censored at study end. We defined a patient as adherent if they had ≥80% of days covered. Results are presented as mean (standard deviation [SD]) or %.

Results: Five hundred patients met inclusion criteria. Included patients had a mean age of 71.9 (SD 11.0), 92.6% were women, and 88.8% Caucasian. Denosumab was the first AOM in 9.8% of patients. In those with a history of previous therapy, a mean of 2.3 (SD 1.5) AOMs were prescribed. Prevalent fractures were present in 32.8%, mean Charlson Comorbidity score of 2.0 (SD 2.7), and 25% had diagnoses for either gastric ulcers or GERD at first denosumab administration. Eighty-three percent of patients had 12 months follow-up and 26% had 24 months of follow-up. Two denosumab injections were given in 82.3% of patients, 3 in 53% and 4 in 30% of patients. Of those who didn’t receive a second administration 2.6% were prescribed another AOM. Mean 1 year PDC, 85.5% (SD 19.0), and 80.7% (SD 21.6) at 2 years. PDC ≥80% was achieved in 72.8% and 62.0% of patients at 1 and 2 years, respectively.

Conclusion: In patients treated with denosumab 72.8% of patients were adherent at 12 months and 62.0% were adherent at 24 months. Only 9.8% of patients started on denosumab were treatment naïve. Adherence rates were higher than those reported for oral bisphosphonates. Other studies have suggested that higher adherence rates for denosumab may be related to in office administration, patient preference and convenience, and a favorable side effect profile. Since studies have suggested that adherence rates <50% are associated with little anti-fracture effect, the greater adherence with denosumab may have important implications for fracture prevention.


Disclosure:

R. A. Overman,
None;

J. C. Lauffenburger,
None;

M. L. Gourlay,
None;

C. L. Deal,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adherence-to-denosumab-in-a-large-healthcare-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology