ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 634

Adherence to Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines for Systemic Lupus Patients

Matthew Basiaga and Lisabeth Scalzi, Rheumatology, Penn State Univ/ Hershey, Hershey, PA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: cardiovascular disease and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) has provided education and guidance for decades on the management of hypercholesterolemia. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are in an intermediate risk category for cardiovascular disease. We examined a SLE cohort to examine whether patients were being treated according to ATP III guidelines.

Methods: Data from 133 patients with SLE was examined to see whether ATP III guidelines were being adhered to. All patients were free of any known clinical heart disease. Available information that was used included traditional CVD risk factors (a history (or present use) of cigarettes, hypertension (HTN) (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg or on an antihypertensive agent for the purpose of lowering blood pressure), HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL, family history of premature CVD, diabetes (self reported history or a fasting blood glucose of >126 mg/dL), fasting cholesterol profiles, and age (men ≥ 45 years; women ≥ 55 years). We then compared the proportion of SLE patients who met ATP III criteria for initiation of lipid therapy and who reported ever having been/ or were presently on therapy to those who had never been on a lipid lowering medication. We evaluated group differences between those patients who have been treated versus those who have not using t-tests and chi-square analyses.

Results: The mean age of the cohort was 50.7 ± 8.8 years, 96% were female, and 78% were Caucasian. Thirty-four of the 133 (26%) participants met ATP III criteria for the initiation of lipid lowering therapy. Only 9 (26%) in this group had ever been on any lipid lowering medication and only 4 (12%) were currently being treated. Significant variables associated with lipid lowering therapy versus no therapy included, the mean number of ATP III risk factors (4.8 versus 4.0; p=0.03), body mass index (35.4 versus 27.8; p=0.001), age (50.2 vs. 57.3 years; p=0.02), cholesterol level (249 versus 187 mg/dL; p<0.0001), LDL (163 vs. 109 mg/dL; p<0.0001), and HTN (78% vs. 40%; p=0.03). Race, SLICC scores, diabetes, HDL, family history, and smoking were not significant variables as to whether a patient was treated.

Conclusion: ATP III guidelines are standard guidelines for assessing whether patients should have interventions, including drug therapy, to treat hyperlipidemia and decrease CVD risk. More than a quarter of our SLE participants met ATP III guidelines for lipid lowering therapy and only 12% of those who fulfilled ATP III criteria were being treated. Younger patients who met criteria were not treated, while older, obese, and those with a higher number of ATP III risk factors were treated. Given that SLE patients are already at an intermediate CVD risk, similar to diabetes, more awareness is needed in addressing the needs of this at-risk population. This is an excellent area for quality improvement for rheumatologists and highlights the need for communication between rheumatologists and primary physicians regarding treatment and/or referral to cardiology for primary preventative care. Future studies addressing obstacles in initiation and maintenance of therapy are needed in SLE patients.


Disclosure:

M. Basiaga,
None;

L. Scalzi,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adherence-to-adult-treatment-panel-iii-guidelines-for-systemic-lupus-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology