ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 998

Adequacy Of Drug Coverage and Cost-Sharing For Medicare Beneficiaries With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Jinoos Yazdany1, R. Adams Dudley2, Randi Chen3 and Chien-Wen Tseng4, 1Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2Medicine, University of California San Francisco Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, 3Pacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, HI, 4Dept of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Hawaii and Pacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, HI

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs, insurance and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Medicare

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services II & III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose :  Biologic and non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) significantly reduce pain, disability and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).  We evaluated how well RA drugs are covered by Medicare Part D plans, and what copays are typically required.

Methods:   We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of all Medicare Part D stand-alone plans’ and Medicare Advantage plans’ formularies (n=2,737) in 50 states and Washington D.C. using the January 2013 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Prescription Drug Plan Formulary and Pharmacy Network Files.  Special Needs Plans (n=643) were excluded since they target subgroups of beneficiaries (e.g. institutionalized, chronic/disabling conditions, dually eligible for Medicaid) and may have specialized formularies. We used the default maintenance dose given by Epocrates©.  To calculate the national average of the percentage of plans covering a drug and account for the fact that plans cover varying geographic regions, we first calculated the percentage of plans covering a drug in each county, averaged these percentages across all counties in the state, and then averaged across all 50 states and Washington D.C.  We also examined prior authorization requirements and calculated the mean copays for each drug across all states.

Results:   All plans covered at least 1 biologic DMARD, but 91% of formularies required providers to first obtain prior authorization (PA) for covered drugs.  Across biologic DMARDs, coverage (with PA) ranged from 29% (anakinra) to 100% (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab; see Table).  In addition, the vast majority of plans (87%) charged a percentage co-insurance, requiring patients to pay on average 30% of drug costs.  Thus, mean copays for biological DMARDs ranged from $255 to $650 per month.  In contrast, for five non-biologic DMARDs (methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, minocycline, hydroxychloroquine), nearly all plans provided coverage without requiring a PA.   For these non-biologic DMARDs, approximately 90% of plans charged a fixed dollar copayment (range $5 to $11 per month); see Table. 

Conclusion :  Although most health plans serving Medicare beneficiaries cover at least one biologic DMARD, nearly all require a PA and charge a percent coinsurance.  Medicare beneficiaries with RA who require biologic therapies can expect very high mean copays regardless of which Part D plan they choose, likely posing a significant financial barrier for many patients.

Table.   Coverage for Rheumatoid Arthritis Drugs in U.S. Medicare Part D Plans.

Drug

Plans covering drug

(%)

Plans covering drug without prior authorization

(%)

Plans Charging Percent

Co-insurance

(%)

Mean

Co-insurance

(%)

Average Copay

Mean (SD)

($)

Biologic

Abatacept

54

4

100

30.1

601 (22)

Adalimumab

100

7

100

30.0

583 (12)

Anakinra

40

4

100

29.9

517 (19)

Certolizumab

59

1

100

29.6

650 (16)

Etanercept

100

7

100

30.0

547 (11)

Golimumab

42

1

100

29.6

580 (17)

Infliximab

100

7

100

30.0

255 (5)

Rituximab

100

8

87

29.5

611 (25)

Tocilizumab

40

1

99

29.7

335 (14)

.

At least 1 biologic DMARD

100

9

87

30.3

275*

.

Non-biologic

Azathioprine

100

34

10

18.1

7 (1)

Cuprimine

60

60

59

30.6

83 (6)

Cyclophosphamide

94

2

20

27.4

32 (3)

Cyclosporine

100

12

22

25.1

34 (2)

Hydroxychloroquine

100

100

10

18.1

5 (1)

Leflunomide

100

100

13

19.3

11 (1)

Methotrexate

100

85

13

19.8

5 (1)

Minocycline

100

94

10

18.1

7 (1)

Sulfasalazine

100

100

10

18.1

5 (1)

.

At least 1 non-biologic DMARD

100

100

11

18.2

4*

.

*mean copay of least expensive drug covered


Disclosure:

J. Yazdany,
None;

R. A. Dudley,
None;

R. Chen,
None;

C. W. Tseng,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/adequacy-of-drug-coverage-and-cost-sharing-for-medicare-beneficiaries-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology