ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1497

Acute Care Utilization in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome and/or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Megan Barber1, Fengjuan Yang2, Leslie Skeith2, Danielle Southern3 and Ann Clarke1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Administrative Data, antiphospholipid syndrome, Health Services Research, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1467–1516) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Little is known about acute care utilization in patients with APS and/or SLE. This study focuses on hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and emergency department (ED) visits, in patients with APS and/or SLE, both one year prior to and after identification of positive aPLs or diagnosis with SLE, compared to a control population.

Methods: Patients from our observational aPL/APS and SLE registries were included. Patients had persistently positive aPL (medium positive [40-80 GPU] or high positive [ >80 GPU] anticardiolipin or anti-beta-2 glycoprotein 1 or a positive lupus anticoagulant test, measured at least 12 weeks apart) and/or fulfilled ACR or SLICC SLE classification criteria. Patients diagnosed with APS clinically met revised Sapporo Criteria. The index date was defined as the date that persistently positive aPL were first identified or that SLE classification criteria were met. Acute care utilization one year prior to and after the index date was determined. Data were sourced from several provincial health-related databases in Alberta, Canada. Acute care utilization was compared to age, sex, and geographic matched controls, excluding individuals with testing for aPLs, ANA, ENA or anti dsDNA or those with any practitioner claim codes or ICD codes for SLE or APS. Controls were assigned the index date of their matched case. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline demographics and acute care utilization. Conditional logistic regressions were applied to assess differences between cases and matched controls for binary outcomes, generalized linear mixed Poisson regression models for discrete count and Gamma regression models for continuous outcomes, accounting for matched pairs.

Results: 459 patients participated: 65 with APS (+/- SLE), and 440 with SLE (+/- aPL) (Table 1). There were 2,525 matched controls randomly selected. One year prior to the index date, patients with APS and/or SLE had significantly higher rates of hospitalizations compared to their respective control groups (all p < 0.0001) (24.0% in APS vs. 3.7% in controls, and 13.9% in SLE vs. 5.0% in controls). ED visits rates were also higher in APS (54.0% vs. 16.7%) and SLE (46.1% vs. 15.9%) groups. One-year post-index date, healthcare utilization remained significantly higher in patients with APS and/or SLE. Hospitalization rates rose to 42.6% in APS and 33.0% in SLE, both significantly higher than their controls (4.7% and 4.9%, respectively; p < 0.0001). SLE patients also had longer hospital stays (5.75 (3.00-9.00) vs. 2.00 (1.00-3.00) median days, p = 0.0323) and more hospitalizations (1.00 (1.00 -2.00) vs. 1.00 (1.00 -1.00), p = 0.0012). ICU admissions rates were higher in SLE patients than controls (1.03% vs. 0.07%, p = 0.0190). ED visit rates remained elevated in APS (59.3% vs. 13.4%) and SLE (47.5% vs. 14.7%) groups, with significantly higher mean visit counts in both (p = 0.0119 for APS; p < 0.0001 for SLE) (Table 2).

Conclusion: Patients with APS and/or SLE have a higher rate of hospitalizations and ED presentations compared to a control population, both one year prior to and after the first identification of positive aPLs or diagnosis of SLE.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: M. Barber: AstraZeneca, 1, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1; F. Yang: None; L. Skeith: CSL Behring, 2, 5, Leo Pharma, 6, Sanofi, 6; D. Southern: None; A. Clarke: AstraZeneca, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, Novartis, 2, Roche, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Barber M, Yang F, Skeith L, Southern D, Clarke A. Acute Care Utilization in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome and/or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/acute-care-utilization-in-patients-with-antiphospholipid-syndrome-and-or-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/acute-care-utilization-in-patients-with-antiphospholipid-syndrome-and-or-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology