ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 942

ACR/EULAR Remission in RA patients in Clinical Practice – Does Substitution of Patient Global with Pain Score Change Remission Rates? Data from the Danish Danbio Registry

Merete Lund Hetland, On behalf of all Depts of Rheumatology in Denmark, The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO), Glostrup Hospital., Copenhagen, Denmark

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical practice, pain, PRO, remission and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects II: Remission and De-escalation of Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Modern treatment strategy in RA aims at remission. In 2011, new ACR/EULAR remission criteria were published for patients with RA. Of four Boolean criteria, one is a patient-reported outcome: The patient’s global score (PATGL), which reflects how much the disease affects the patient’s life at the present. It has been criticized that patient’s pain score (PAIN) is not included, since pain is the single largest problem for patients with RA. Our aim was to investigate how such a modification of the remission criteria, replacing PATGL with PAIN, would impact achievement of remission in patients treated in routine care.

Methods:

The DANBIO registry is a nationwide, Danish database that is used by all public hospital departments of rheumatology and many rheumatologists in private practice. Patients are followed prospectively and PATGL, PAIN, as well as doctor’s global (DOCGL) and FATIGUE scores are collected routinely at all visits. For the present study, the latest visit for each patient was selected.

Results:

A total of 16,154 patients with RA were included (age: 65 years (55-73) (median(25-75%)), disease duration: 8 years (3-16), 28.4% men, 86.5% IgM-RF positive, 25.0%/75.0% treated with biologics/sDMARD, HAQ: 0.625(0.125-1.375), DAS28CRP: 2.5 (1.8-3.4)).

16.5% of the patients fulfilled the Boolean criteria for remission (SJC≤1, TJC≤1, CRP≤10mg/L, and PATGL ≤10mm). PATGL and PAIN were closely correlated (Spearman’s rho=0.86, p<0.0001).

If PATGL was substituted by PAIN, the remission rate was largely similar: 18.0%, but 5% (680/13,485 pts) changed status from no remission to remission, and 16.7% (446/2,669 pts) from remission to no remission.

If PATGL was substituted by FATIGUE, the remission rate was 13.2% (with 3% of patients (400/13,178) changing status from no remission to remission, and 36% of patients (946/2627) from remission to no remission.

If PATGL≤10 mm was substituted by PATGL≤20mm, the remission rate increased to 25.7%.

If PATGL was substituted by DOCGL, the remission rate increased to 45.4%, and 35.6% of patients (4,598/12,928) changed from no remission to remission, and 5.3% (138/2584) from remission to no remission.

Conclusion:

In >15,000 RA patients treated in routine care in a treat-to-target setting, 16.5% fulfilled the 2011 ACR/EULAR Boolean remission criteria at their latest visit. Substitution of patient’s global with pain score only changed the remission rate marginally. In accordance with this, the two scores were highly correlated. In contrast, substituting patient’s global with doctor’s global score almost tripled the fraction of patients in remission. The finding underscores the importance of inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in the remission criteria, but PATGLO and PAIN seemed to capture largely the same patients as being in remission.


Disclosure:

M. L. Hetland,
None;

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/acreular-remission-in-ra-patients-in-clinical-practice-does-substitution-of-patient-global-with-pain-score-change-remission-rates-data-from-the-danish-danbio-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology