ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 340

Accessing Positive (but Not Negative) Online Reviews Is Associated with Increased Willingness to Take Medication

Changchuan Jiang1, Ellen Peters2 and Liana Fraenkel3, 1Yale University, New Haven, CT, 2Decision Research, Eugene, OR, 3Rheumatology, Rheumatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, New Haven, CT

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Osteoporosis and patient preferences

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Testimonials have been shown to have a strong influence on patient decision-making. Patients are increasingly accessing the Internet as a source of medical information. In this study, we sought to examine whether the number of positive or negative reviews accessed influence willingness to take a medication.

Methods: We administered a survey to Mechanical Turk workers (≥ 50 years old) who were not currently taking any medications for osteoporosis or osteopenia. Participants’ received information describing outcomes using one of three randomly distributed formats: icon array, icon array followed by narrative reviews, or narrative reviews followed by icon arrays. Subjects in the latter two groups were included for these analyses. The outcomes in the reviews were purposely composed to match the actual distribution of outcomes associated with a commonly used osteoporosis treatment. Each review was rated by actual patients on a 5-point scale (illustrated by stars). Willingness to take medication was measured on a 10-point scale before and after reading the description of the medication and reviews (in the two groups including testimonials). Reviews could be read by clicking on links. We examined whether ratings and number of online testimonials accessed influenced change in willingness to take the medication using linear mixed models adjusting for baseline willingness, age, sex, race, education, numeracy, osteoporosis/osteopenia and previous history of osteoporosis/fracture. Reviews rated above ‘3” were defined as positive; the rest were defined negative. The influence of positive and negative reviews was examined in separate models due to their strong collinearity.

Results: 276 participants were randomized to one of the two groups including testimonials. The mean (SD) age was 59 (7), and the majority were female (61%), white (73%) and college graduates (67%). We found significantly positive associations between the number of accessed positive testimonials and willingness to take the medication (p=0.015). However, no significant association was found between the number of accessed negative testimonials and willingness. Education level and numeracy did not modify the association between reviews accessed and willingness to take the medication (data not shown).

Conclusion: In this study, we found that willingness to take a medication for osteoporosis was positively associated with the number of positive online testimonials accessed. These results support the need to examine the impact of evidenced-based narratives as decision support tools.

 

Table. Association between Positive (Model 1) and Negative (Model2) reviews with willingness to take a medication for osteoporosis.

 

Model1

Model2

β coefficient

p-value

β coefficient

p-value

Willingness Before Reading the Description

0.669

<.0001

0.669

<.0001

Age

-0.027

0.138

-0.025

0.170

Male vs. Female

0.401

0.130

0.376

0.159

White vs. Non-White

0.137

0.644

0.087

0.773

High Numeracy vs. Low

0.521

0.053

0.470

0.088

Education Level College Graduate vs. Less

0.276

0.294

0.340

0.196

History of Bone Fracture vs. None

0.194

0.615

0.174

0.655

Osteopenia/Osteoporosis vs. None

-0.019

0.949

-0.0284

0.927

Number of Positive Reviews Accessed

0.027

0.015

N/A

N/A

Number of Negative Reviews Accessed

N/A

N/A

0.0563

0.218

 


Disclosure: C. Jiang, None; E. Peters, None; L. Fraenkel, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jiang C, Peters E, Fraenkel L. Accessing Positive (but Not Negative) Online Reviews Is Associated with Increased Willingness to Take Medication [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/accessing-positive-but-not-negative-online-reviews-is-associated-with-increased-willingness-to-take-medication/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/accessing-positive-but-not-negative-online-reviews-is-associated-with-increased-willingness-to-take-medication/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology