ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1715

ABT-122, an Immunoglobulin Targeting Both TNF-α and IL-17A, Does Not Provide Significantly Greater Efficacy Compared with Adalimumab in Subjects with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from Exposure-Response Analyses

Ben Klunder1, Amit Khatri2, Mukul Minocha3, Paul Peloso4 and Ahmed A. Othman2, 1AbbVie, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany, 2AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 3Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, 4AbbVie, North Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Immunoglobulin (IG), interleukins (IL), psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster II: Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  ABT-122 is a novel dual-variable domain immunoglobulin (DVD-IgTM), which specifically neutralizes both TNF alpha (TNFα) and interleukin-17A (IL-17). Drugs individually neutralizing TNFα or IL-17 have demonstrated efficacy in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). The objective of this work was to quantitatively characterize the relationship between ABT-122 or adalimumab serum concentrations and the respective ACR20/50/70, PASI50/75/90 and DAS28 (CRP) responses following treatment in subjects with PsA who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate.

Methods:  Subcutaneous (SC) doses of ABT-122 120 mg every week (EW; N=71) and 240 mg EW (N=73) were evaluated in this 12-week randomized, double blind, placebo (N=24) controlled Phase 2 study, with adalimumab 40 mg SC every other week (EOW, N=71) as an active comparator. Serial ABT-122 and adalimumab serum concentrations collected every other week and time course of efficacy data collected at weeks 3, 5, 7, 10, and 12, were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. The relationships of ABT-122 and adalimumab average serum concentrations (Cavg) during the dosing interval and the ACR20/50/70 and PASI50/75/90 responses as well as dropouts were characterized using Markov models, where active therapies enhanced transition of the status of patients to higher levels of response (e.g. no response to ACR20, ACR20 to ACR50, ACR50 to ACR70). For DAS28 (CRP), indirect response models with ABT-122 and adalimumab suppressing the response were utilized.

Results: The 120 and 240 mg EW doses of ABT-122 provided 2-fold and 4-fold higher molar serum concentrations compared with adalimumab 40 mg EOW dose. There was no evidence of different maximal effects between ABT-122 and adalimumab with available data. The EC50 values (the concentrations associated with 50% of maximal effect) on the transition rates between ACR responses for ABT-122 and adalimumab were 6.5 nM (relative standard error [RSE]= 170%) and 13.0 nM (RSE = 61% ), respectively. Analyses provided similar results for PASI responses with EC50 for the transition rates to higher PASI response (no response to PASI50, PASI50 to PASI75) for ABT-122 and adalimumab as 27 nM (RSE= 91%) and 34 nM (RSE = 58%), respectively. The IC50, concentrations associated with 50% of maximal reduction of DAS28(CRP) responses, for ABT-122 and adalimumab were 60 nM (RSE = 18%) and 32 nM (RSE = 24%), respectively, with maximum inhibition of the baseline DAS28(CRP) level fixed to 45% based on observed data. These analyses indicate that the ACR, PASI and DAS28 (CRP) responses of ABT-122 approximately plateau at an ABT-122 dose of 120 mg EW in PsA patients. Combined analyses across studies in subjects with background MTX and either rheumatoid arthritis or PsA (ABT-122 dose range of 60 mg EOW and 240 mg EW) provided similar results.

Conclusion: The exposure-response relationships of efficacy for ABT-122 and adalimumab were not distinguishably different in subjects with PsA on background MTX. Overall, there was no clear evidence that inhibition of the IL-17 pathway provides significant incremental efficacy benefit in presence of TNF inhibition.


Disclosure: B. Klunder, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; A. Khatri, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; M. Minocha, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; P. Peloso, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; A. A. Othman, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Klunder B, Khatri A, Minocha M, Peloso P, Othman AA. ABT-122, an Immunoglobulin Targeting Both TNF-α and IL-17A, Does Not Provide Significantly Greater Efficacy Compared with Adalimumab in Subjects with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from Exposure-Response Analyses [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/abt-122-an-immunoglobulin-targeting-both-tnf-%ce%b1-and-il-17a-does-not-provide-significantly-greater-efficacy-compared-with-adalimumab-in-subjects-with-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-exposure-re/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/abt-122-an-immunoglobulin-targeting-both-tnf-%ce%b1-and-il-17a-does-not-provide-significantly-greater-efficacy-compared-with-adalimumab-in-subjects-with-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-exposure-re/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology