ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1041

Abatacept in the Treatment of Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 24-Week Results from a Phase III Study

P Mease1, AB Gottlieb2, D van der Heijde3, Oliver FitzGerald4, A Johnsen5, M Nys6, S Banerjee5 and D Gladman7, 1Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Tufts University School of Medicine (affiliation at the time of the study), Boston, MA, 3Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 4Department of Rheumatology, St Vincent’s University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 5Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 6Bristol-Myers Squibb, Braine-l’Alleud, Belgium, 7Rheumatology, University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Abatacept, Clinical research and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment II: Axial Spondyloarthritis – Treatment

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Abatacept (ABA), a selective T-cell co-stimulation modulator, showed promise for the treatment of PsA in a Phase II trial.1 This prompted the conduct of the Phase III Active pSoriaTic aRthritis rAndomizEd triAl (ASTRAEA; NCT01860976); key results are presented here.

Methods: In this international, double-blind, multicenter study, patients (pts) with PsA were randomized (1:1) to SC ABA 125 mg wkly or placebo for 24 wks, and then treated with open-label SC ABA up to 24 mths. Pts had active disease (≥3 tender and ≥3 swollen joints), ≥2 cm target lesion of plaque psoriasis and inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 non-biologic DMARD. Randomization was stratified by MTX use, prior TNFi use and skin involvement ≥3% of body surface area (BSA). Pts not achieving ≥20% improvement in SJC and TJC at Day 113 were switched to open-label ABA (early escape). Primary endpoint: ACR20 response at Wk 24. Key secondary endpoints at Wk 24: HAQ response (change from baseline ≥0.35); ACR20 response in the TNFi-naïve and -exposed subgroups; radiographic non-progression (PsA-modified total Sharp/van der Heijde score; change from baseline ≤0). Other secondary/exploratory endpoints included: ≥50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI50) in pts with ≥3% BSA; change in HAQ score; safety. Comparisons were performed using a 2-sided Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel chi-square test, adjusted for stratification criteria. Pts designated as early escape or with missing data were imputed as non-responders/radiographic progressors. Change in HAQ score was analyzed using a longitudinal repeated measures model (early escape pts set to missing at Days 141 and 169). Primary and key secondary endpoints were tested using a hierarchical approach.

Results: Of 424 pts enrolled, 213 received ABA and 211 placebo; 76 were early escape pts in ABA and 89 in placebo; 12 pts discontinued in ABA and 24 in placebo. Table 1 shows baseline characteristics. Most (>60%) pts had prior exposure to TNFis. ABA significantly improved the proportion of pts achieving an ACR20 response at Wk 24 (p<0.001) (Table 2). The proportion of HAQ responses was numerically higher with ABA vs placebo (p=0.097). Higher proportions of pts receiving ABA vs placebo had an ACR20 response in the TNFi-naïve and -exposed subgroups, and radiographic non-progression (nominal p<0.05), with modest numerical improvement in PASI50. Efficacy was maintained at 1 year. The safety profile of ABA was similar to placebo, with no new safety signals.

Conclusion: Abatacept improved disease and was well tolerated in pts with active PsA, regardless of prior exposure to TNFis.   1.    Mease P, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:939–48.    

Table 1. Baseline characteristics
  Abatacept (n=213) Placebo (n=211)
Age, years 51.0 (10.7) 49.8 (11.3)
Female, n (%) 121 (56.8) 112 (53.1)
PsA duration, years 8.3 (8.1) 8.8 (8.3)
Prior TNFi use, n (%) 129 (60.6) 130 (61.6)
Concomitant MTX, n (%) 129 (60.6) 127 (60.2)
DAS28 (CRP) 5.0 (1.1) 4.9 (1.1)
Tender joint count 21.0 (13.4) 19.3 (13.1)
Swollen joint count 12.1 (7.8) 11.1 (7.2)
HAQ score 1.3 (0.7) 1.3 (0.7)
Patient Global Assessment of disease activity, 0–100 mm VAS 61.1 (23.5) 62.6 (22.6)
Physician Global Assessment of disease activity, 0–100 mm VAS 53.9 (18.8) 55.0 (19.6)
Patient Global Assessment of pain, 0–100 mm VAS 64.2 (23.5) 64.4 (21.8)
CRP, mg/L 14.0 (20.9) 14.3 (30.3)
PsA-modified total SHS 20.0 (46.8) 17.7 (39.6)
Psoriasis covering ≥3% BSA, n (%) 146 (68.5) 148 (70.1)
PASI score* 7.4 (8.0) 7.2 (7.8)
Data are mean (SD) unless indicated otherwise *For patients with psoriasis covering ≥3% of BSA BSA=body surface area; HAQ=Health Assessment Questionnaire; PASI=Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; SHS=Sharp/van der Heijde score; VAS=visual analog scale
 

Table 2. Outcomes at Week 24
  Abatacept Placebo Estimated difference (95% CI) p value
ACR20 responders 39.4 (84/213) 22.3 (47/211) 17.2 (8.7, 25.6) <0.001
ACR20 responders – TNFi naïve 44.0 (37/84) 22.2 (18/81) 21.9 (8.3, 35.6) 0.003*
ACR20 responders – TNFi exposed 36.4 (47/129) 22.3 (29/130) 14.0 (3.3, 24.8) 0.012*
HAQ responders† 31.0 (66/213) 23.7 (50/211) 7.2 (–1.1, 15.6) 0.097
HAQ, change from baseline, mean (SD) –0.33 (0.04) –0.20 (0.05) –0.13 (–0.25, –0.01) NC
Radiographic non-progressors 42.7 (91/213) 32.7 (69/211) 10.0 (1.0, 19.1) 0.034*
PASI 50 26.7 (39/146) 19.6 (29/148) 7.3 (–2.2, 16.7) 0.137*
Data are % (n/N) unless indicated otherwise A hierarchical testing procedure was applied to the primary and key secondary endpoints in the following order: ACR20 responders, HAQ responders, ACR20 responders – TNFi naïve, ACR responders – TNFi exposed, radiographic non-progressors. Early Escape patients and other patients with missing data at Day 169 were imputed as non‑responders/radiographic progressors at Day 169 *Nominal p value †HAQ response was defined as a score reduction of ≥0.35 from baseline NC=not calculated; PASI 50=≥50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score
 

Disclosure: P. Mease, AbbVie, 2,AbbVie, 5,AbbVie, 8; A. Gottlieb, Amgen Inc.; Astellas, Akros, Centocor (Janssen), Inc., Celgene Corp., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Beiersdorf, Inc., Abbott Labs. (AbbVie), TEVA, Actelion, UCB, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Dermipsor Ltd., Incyte, Pfizer, Canfite, Lilly, Coronado, Vertex, Karyoph, 5,Centocor (Janssen), Amgen, Abbott (AbbVie), Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Lilly, Coronado, Levia, Merck, Xenoport, Dermira, Baxalta, 2; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, 5,Imaging Rheumatology bv Director, 9; O. FitzGerald, AbbVie, Pfizer, BMS, 2,AbbVie, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Lilly, 5; A. Johnsen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; M. Nys, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; S. Banerjee, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; D. Gladman, AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 2,AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease P, Gottlieb A, van der Heijde D, FitzGerald O, Johnsen A, Nys M, Banerjee S, Gladman D. Abatacept in the Treatment of Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 24-Week Results from a Phase III Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/abatacept-in-the-treatment-of-active-psoriatic-arthritis-24-week-results-from-a-phase-iii-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/abatacept-in-the-treatment-of-active-psoriatic-arthritis-24-week-results-from-a-phase-iii-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology