ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1568

A Survey Study of Methotrexate Use by Rheumatologists and Their Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Peter Nash1 and Dave Nicholls2, 1University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2Coast Joint Care, Maroochydore, Australia

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX), patient preferences and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

Methotrexate (MTX) is the anchor medication for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however there is limited patient-focused data available on the use of MTX, which could be used to improve RA outcomes.  The primary objective of this study, termed MATRIX (Mapping Australian Treatment Reality Involving MTX), was to assess the use and perceptions of MTX by patients with RA.  Secondary objectives included the assessment of patient-reported adverse events, the use of alcohol, folic acid, and biologic agents, and the perceptions of rheumatologists.  Here we highlight tolerability to MTX, the perceptions of rheumatologists, and the use of biologic agents.

Methods:

Rheumatologists (N = 46 of 50 completed surveys) and their patients with RA (N = 1,313 of 1,500 completed surveys; consecutively sampled); mean age 58.5 years, 72% female) completed pre-tested, voluntary, anonymous, self-administered questionnaires about their experience with MTX. 

Results:

Generally, patients reported taking oral MTX regularly (78% currently taking MTX, 92% orally, 70% ≥ 10 mg / week) and followed prescription instructions (91% took folic acid; 46% abstained from alcohol).  However, 17% of patients had discontinued from MTX (13% within 1 to 2 years), mostly because of adverse events (12%).  For patients taking MTX, adverse events (including nausea, headache, mouth ulcers, light-headedness, and diarrhea) were noted by 60% of patients, but events were experienced regularly (92%) and some were continual (13%).  Most patients (72%) reported never missing a dose of MTX, but 6% miss at least 1 dose every 2 months and 8% intentionally and regularly ‘take a break’ from MTX, despite regular attendance at the clinic.  Although rheumatologists were aware of tolerability to MTX, they generally underestimated the positive attitude that patients had towards their MTX therapy; for example 35% of patients would prefer to discontinue MTX but rheumatologists estimated 47% of patients would prefer to discontinue MTX.  Rheumatologists also underestimated the proportion of patients who reported taking biologic agent ‘monotherapy’ (ie, without MTX; ≤ 20%); 29% of patients were on biologic agents, and of these, 29% were taking biologic agent ‘monotherapy’ and 70% were taking biologic agents in combination with MTX.  The most common biologic agents were adalimumab, etanercept, and tocilizumab; tocilizumab use was higher with biologic agent ‘monotherapy’.  Of note, compared with all patients a greater proportion of patients taking biologic agents would prefer to discontinue MTX (43%).

Conclusion:

MTX was well-used and positively perceived by patients with RA.  However, our study highlights the need for rheumatologists to monitor patient use of RA medication with the aim of ensuring patients continue with, and maximize, their use of MTX therapy, particularly in combination with biologic agents.


Disclosure:

P. Nash,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5;

D. Nicholls,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

8,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-survey-study-of-methotrexate-use-by-rheumatologists-and-their-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology