ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 800

A Strategy For Selecting Individuals With RA For Reduction Of Anti-TNF Therapy Using Combined Clinical and Ultrasound Assessment

Christopher R. Holroyd1,2, Brian Davidson3, Sarah Bennett3, David Waghorn3, Caron Underhil3, Cyrus Cooper2, Antonia Calogeras3, Elaine M. Dennison4, Nicholas C. Harvey5, Ray Armstrong3, Stephan Gadola6 and Christopher J. Edwards7,8, 1Rheumatology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom, 2MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton, United Kingdom, 3University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom, 4MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, 5University of Southampton, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton, United Kingdom, 6University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, 7NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom, 8University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Treatment Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Reducing the dose of biological therapy may be possible for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have achieved remission or low disease activity (LDA).  However, patients in clinical remission may have synovitis detectable by ultrasound (US) and continue to accrue damage. We aimed to develop a strategy using both clinical and US assessment in a biologics review clinic to increase the likelihood of selecting the correct patients for biological therapy dose reduction, thereby minimising the chance of damage in those with subclinical synovitis.

Methods: All patients with RA (ACR criteria) receiving biologic therapies were reviewed in a biologics review clinic. At each appointment, patients underwent DAS28 assessment and US of their MCPs, PIP(2-5) and wrist joints (Esoate Mylab70). Synovitis was detected by power doppler (PDUS) and scored on a 0-3 semi-quantitative scale. PDUS remission was defined as a score of 0. Patients in clinical and US remission (DAS28<2.6 & PDUS=0) had the dose of anti-TNF therapy reduced by a third (adalimumab (ADA) to 40mg 3 weekly, etanercept (ETN) to 50mg every 10 days, infliximab (INF) reduced to 2mg/kg per infusion, certolizumab (CZB) reduced to 200mg every 3  weeks, golimumab (GOL) reduced to 50mg every 6 weeks). Patients were followed-up and if disease flared they were advised to ring a helpline to arrange an urgent clinic visit where a repeat DAS28 and US assessments were performed, and if needed the dose was increased back to baseline.

Results: 321 RA patients attended the clinic. All had fulfilled local requirements for biological therapy eligibility (including DAS28>5.1, and failed ³2 non-biological DMARDs). Baseline demographics showed mean age 59.4 years, 75.4% female, mean time from diagnosis to first biological therapy 10.8years, mean pre-biologic DAS28 5.69, baseline biologic ADA 112, ETN 58, INF 41, GOL 5, CZB 5, rituximab 73, tocilizumab 25, abatacept 2. 179(55.8%) patients were receiving their first biological, 197(61.4%) received a biologic & methotrexate in combination.

101(31.5%) patients were in DAS28 remission and 45(15%) were in LDA. PDUS remission was present in 42.9% and of those in clinical remission 69(72.6%) had a PDUS score of 0. Biological reduction was agreed by 56(81.2%) patients and of these, 42(75%) have remained on a reduced dose at a mean of 8.7 months. 14 patients have flared and returned to baseline treatment at a mean of 5.9 months.  Of patients flaring DAS28 score increased by mean 0.6. 11(78.6%) had a DAS28>2.6 and 50% had a PDUS=0.

Conclusion: A strategy using clinical assessment and US may increase the likelihood of correctly selecting patients with RA who could successfully reduce the dose of their biological therapy whilst maintaining clinical and ultrasound remission. This strategy may minimize the risk of ongoing joint damage in those who reduce therapy.


Disclosure:

C. R. Holroyd,
None;

B. Davidson,
None;

S. Bennett,
None;

D. Waghorn,
None;

C. Underhil,
None;

C. Cooper,
None;

A. Calogeras,
None;

E. M. Dennison,
None;

N. C. Harvey,
None;

R. Armstrong,
None;

S. Gadola,
None;

C. J. Edwards,

Pfizer, AbbVie, MSD, Roche, UCB, Celgene, Samsung Bioepis, Jansen, BMS,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-strategy-for-selecting-individuals-with-ra-for-reduction-of-anti-tnf-therapy-using-combined-clinical-and-ultrasound-assessment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology