ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2634

A Signal of Improvement in Lupus Disease Activity at 3 Months Predicts Further Valid Improvement at 6 Months

Zahi Touma1, Dafna D. Gladman2, Dominique Ibanez1 and Murray B. Urowitz2, 1Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, outcome measures and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Epidemiology, Women's Health, Cardiovascular and CNS

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   In patients with active disease, physicians look for an early signal in response to treatment to guide their therapeutic decisions.

 

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) measures disease activity in 24 descriptors, generates a total score describing disease activity overall. SLEDAI-2K records descriptors of disease activity as present or absent. In the SLEDAI-2K Responder Index 50 (S2K RI-50), each of the 24 descriptors has a definition for a ≥ 50% improvement resulting in an appropriate 50% score for the corresponding descriptor and a total score describing disease activity overall.

We aimed to determine if a signal of improvement in disease activity at 3 months predicts further improvement at 6 months.

Methods:   Consecutive active lupus patients who attended the clinic between 2012 and 2014 were screened for inclusion. Patients were included if they: 1) had at least 1 of the following 5 SLEDAI-2K clinical organ systems active (vascular, renal, musculoskeletal, serosal or skin); central nervous system was excluded and 2) started or increased prednisone therapy and/or immunosuppressants.  All patients had to have a follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months.

Outcome measures: Disease activity was measured by SLEDAI-2K at all visits and by S2K RI-50 at 3 months.

Study definitions: Signal of improvement by SLEDAI-2K is defined as a decrease by ≥1 in SLEDAI-2K score at 3 months. Signal of improvement by S2K RI-50 is defined as a decrease by ≥1 in S2K RI-50 score at 3 months.

Study endpoints:

Based on the change in the total SLEDAI-2K score (baseline – last visit), each of the patients at last visit were grouped as: 1) improved (SLEDAI-2K decreased by ≥4) and not improved (SLEDAI-2K decreased <4).

 

First, we identified the patients with SLEDAI-2K signal at 3 months and those who did not have a SLEDAI-2K signal were further evaluated for possible S2K RI-50 signal. Patients with signals were reevaluated at 6 months to determine if they had further improvement.

Results:   87 patients with mean SLEDAI-2K at baseline visit was 8.9±5.1 were studied.  90% were female, age at baseline visit was 40.0±12.4 and disease duration was 13.2±9.6years.

Signals of improvement: Of the 87 patients, 54 (62%) had a SLEDAI-2K signal at 3 months. Of the 33 patients who did not have a SLEDAI-2K signal, a S2K RI-50 signal was identified in 11 (33%) patients.

Study endpoints: Of the 54 patients with SLEDAI-2K signal at 3 months, 28 (52%) patients improved at 6 months. Of the 11 patients with S2K RI-50 signal at 3 months, 5 (46%) improved at 6 months.

Conclusion:   A signal of improvement at 3 months predicts further improvement in disease activity at 6 months. S2K RI-50 signal at 3 months, which is not discern by SLEDAI-2K, predicts improvement in half of the patients at 6 months. S2KRI-50 can identify non responders at 3 months who will respond at 6 months

 


Disclosure:

Z. Touma,
None;

D. D. Gladman,
None;

D. Ibanez,
None;

M. B. Urowitz,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-signal-of-improvement-in-lupus-disease-activity-at-3-months-predicts-further-valid-improvement-at-6-months/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology