ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2718

A Retrospective Study Comparing Refractoriness to Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Adults with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis as Compared to Those with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Kiana Taba1 and Elizabeth Ortiz 2, 1University of Southern California, LAGUNA HILLS, CA, 2LAC+USC/Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Biologic agents

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – ePoster III: Systemic JIA, Fever, & Vasculitis

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The use of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) has vastly changed the treatment of autoimmune arthritis, both Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and polyarticular and oligoarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). At this time 5 bDMARDs are approved by the FDA for JIA, however, many patients fail these medications, due to adverse effects or inefficacy. Studies looking at retention rate for these medications have found varying reasons for discontinuation of first line treatments between adults and children, however attention has not been paid to those patients who fail multiple rounds of bDMARDs, and have come to be considered refractory.  As childhood-onset rheumatic disease is often more severe than adult-onset, we hypothesize that JIA patients will have an increased rate of refractoriness when compared to RA patients. This study aims to characterize and compare refractory patients with JIA and RA.

Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of adult patients diagnosed with polyarticular or oligoarticular JIA as children and adult-onset RA seen in the Los Angeles County + University Southern California Medical Center (LAC+USC) and Keck University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2017. All JIA patients were diagnosed and treated by pediatric rheumatologists as children and all RA patients were diagnosed based on the 1987 ACR classification criteria. Patients were deemed refractory if they failed ≥ 3 DMARDs, one of which is a bDMARD.  Refractory patients were included in the study as cases and controls were selected from non-refractory patients.  Descriptive statistics were reported for demographic and clinic data. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between arthritis type (JIA vs. RA) and refractoriness while controlling for disease duration.

Results: A total of 100 patients were reviewed, 53 adults with polyarticular or oligoarticular JIA and 47 RA patients.  Ninety-three percent were women and 76% were Hispanic. The JIA group was younger (mean age 27.7 years, SD of 10.3) than the RA group (mean age 55.9 years, SD of 11.8).  However, average disease durations were comparable (mean of 15.5 years in the JIA group, 14.3 in the RA group).  There was no difference in number of refractory cases between JIA and RA patients, 50.9% and 53.2%, respectively. Comparison of the refractory cases and their controls, however, showed an increase in disease duration (mean 17.8 years vs. 11.8 years) as well as a higher prevalence of sero-positivity for both RF and anti-CCP status (82.70% and 78.57% as compared with 58.33% and 66.67%) and erosive disease (55.77% as opposed to 20.83%).

Conclusion: This study failed to find an association between adult JIA patients and refractory disease when compared with RA patients.  Although JIA patients are equally refractory to DMARDs when adjusted for disease duration, this still presents a formidable problem when it comes to the future of these patients, as they likely have at least double the number of years with disease ahead of them when compared to RA patients. Future studies evaluating the continued bDMARD use in young, refractory patients are necessary to better understand how best to treat these patients. 


Disclosure: K. Taba, None; E. Ortiz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Taba K, Ortiz E. A Retrospective Study Comparing Refractoriness to Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Adults with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis as Compared to Those with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-retrospective-study-comparing-refractoriness-to-biologic-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-in-adults-with-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-as-compared-to-those-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-retrospective-study-comparing-refractoriness-to-biologic-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-in-adults-with-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-as-compared-to-those-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology