ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 887

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Ascending-Dose, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics Study of CC-220 in Subjects with Systemic LUPUS Erythematosus

Richard Furie1, Victoria P. Werth2, Allison Gaudy3, Ying Ye3, Shimon Korish3, Ada Azaryan3, Nikolay Delev3, Douglas Hough3, Michael Weiswasser3, Suktae Choi3 and Peter Schafer3, 1Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, 2University of Pennsylvania and the VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 3Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment I: Novel and Current Therapies

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: CC-220 is a CUL4CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase modulator that binds to cereblon and leads to potent and deep reduction of the transcription factors Ikaros(IKZF1) and Aiolos (IKZF3), which are overexpressed in the peripheral blood of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) subjects. CC-220 is currently in development for the treatment of SLE as well as other autoimmune conditions and multiple myeloma. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of CC-220 in subjects with SLE. Exploratory efficacy assessments were included.

Methods: Subjects with history of SLE ≥6 months and a baseline of hybrid SELENA-SLEDAI (hSS) score ≥4 were randomized to 1 of 4 escalating doses of CC-220 or matching placebo (PBO). The 4 active treatments were CC-220 0.3 mg QOD, 0.3 mg QD, 0.3 mg alternating with 0.6 mg QD, and 0.6 mg QD; subjects were randomized 4:1 active to PBO in each group for 12 weeks of treatment, followed by 12 weeks of observational follow-up and/or long-term extension. Stable doses of corticosteroids (≤10 mg prednisone or equivalent daily), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and antimalarials were permitted. Safety assessments included clinical evaluation of adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, electrocardiograms, physical examinations, and overall tolerability. Exploratory efficacy assessments included hSS, Cutaneous Lupus Area and Severity Index (CLASI) skin scores, Physician Global Assessment (PGA), swollen joint counts (SJC), and tender joint counts (TJC).

Results: A total of 42 adult subjects were randomized; 39 subjects were female (93%); Mean age was 47.2 years; 64% were White and 31% were Black or African-American. Mean SLE duration was 9.4 years, with a mean baseline hSS score of 6.6, CLASI activity score of 9.8, and PGA score of 1.3. Seventy-nine percent of subjects completed the study; 9 of 42 subjects discontinued, of which 6 subjects discontinued due to an adverse event (AE): 1 in the placebo group and 5 in the 2 highest CC-220 groups combined. No discontinuations were due to lack of efficacy. Four subjects had serious AEs (highest CC-220 doses: n=2 [pneumonia]; PBO: n=2). Three subjects had neutropenia (grade 3: n=2; grade 1: n=1); 2 subjects in the highest CC-220 dose group had dermatitis, and 1 subject in the 0.3 mg QD and 1 in the 0.6 mg QD dose groups had urticaria. Pharmacokinetic evaluation demonstrated dose proportional exposure between cohorts, with moderate accumulation in the non-alternating dose cohort. An exposure-response analysis demonstrated decreasing B cells, pDCs with increased exposure to CC-220.

Conclusion: CC-220 was generally well tolerated in this SLE population over 12 weeks of treatment, with neutropenia and dermatitis observed at the highest doses studied. Treatment with CC-220 resulted in a trend toward greater improvement in multiple measures of SLE disease activity compared with PBO. These results support further development of CC-220 in SLE patient population.

 


Disclosure: R. Furie, Celgene, 5; V. P. Werth, Celgene Corporation, 2; A. Gaudy, Celgene, 3; Y. Ye, Celgene, 3; S. Korish, Celgene, 3; A. Azaryan, Celgene Corporation, 3; N. Delev, Celgene Corporation, 3; D. Hough, Celgene Corporation, 3; M. Weiswasser, Celgene, 3; S. Choi, Celgene, 3; P. Schafer, Celgene, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Furie R, Werth VP, Gaudy A, Ye Y, Korish S, Azaryan A, Delev N, Hough D, Weiswasser M, Choi S, Schafer P. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Ascending-Dose, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics Study of CC-220 in Subjects with Systemic LUPUS Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-placebo-controlled-double-blind-ascending-dose-safety-and-pharmacokinetics-study-of-cc-220-in-subjects-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-placebo-controlled-double-blind-ascending-dose-safety-and-pharmacokinetics-study-of-cc-220-in-subjects-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology