ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2056

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study Comparing SB2, an Infliximab Biosimilar, to the Infliximab Reference Product (Remicade®) in Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy: 54-Week Results

Jung-Yoon Choe1, Nenad Prodanovic2, Jaroslaw Niebrzydowski3, Ivan Staykov4, Eva Dokoupilova5, Asta Baranauskaite6, Roman Yatsyshyn7, Mevludin Mekic8, Wieslawa Porawska9, Hana Ciferska10, Krystyna Jedrychowicz-Rosiak11, Agnieszka Zielinska12, Jasmine Choi13, Young Hee Rho13 and Josef S. Smolen14, 1Division of Rheumatology, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea, 2Clinical Center Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia, 3Medica Pro Familia, Gdynia, Poland, 4MHAT "Dr. Ivan Seliminski", AD, Sliven, Bulgaria, 5MEDICAL PLUS s.r.o, Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic, 6Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania, 7SHEI Ivano-Frankivsk NMU, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 8University Clinic Centre Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia, 9Poznanski Osrodek Medyczny NOVAMED, Poznan, Poland, 10Revmatologicky ustav, Praha 2, Czech Republic, 11MCBK S.C., Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland, 12Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o.o. Spolka Komandytowo-Akcyjna, Warszawa, Poland, 13Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Incheon, South Korea, 14Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biosimilars and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy III: Biosimilars

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: SB2 is developed as
a biosimilar of the infliximab reference product (INF). 30-week efficacy and
safety results from a randomized phase III study were recently presented1.
The objective of this study is to compare the long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity
between SB2 and INF, including progression of radiographic damage, up to 54
weeks.

Methods: This study is a
randomized, double-blind phase III study.
Patients with moderate to severe RA (1987 ACR criteria) despite methotrexate (MTX) were randomized in a 1:1
ratio to receive either SB2 or INF (3 mg/kg). Dose increments were allowed
after week 30 up to 7.5 mg/kg. Dosing occurred at week 0, 2, 6 and then every 8
weeks until week 46. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity outcomes were assessed
up to week 54 at each visit. Radiographic damage was assessed by the change of
modified total sharp score (mTSS) from baseline to
week 54.

Results: A total of 584
patients were randomized to either SB2 (N=291) or INF (N=293) and 452 patients completed
54 weeks of treatment (SB2 N=227, INF N=225). The ACR20 response rate at week
54 in the full analysis set (FAS) was 50.7% in SB2 and 52.6% in INF (Figure 1).
The ACR50 and ACR70 responses were also similar (32.1%
vs. 29.7%; 18.3% vs. 17.7%, Figure 1). Other secondary efficacy parameters at week
54 such as DAS28 or EULAR response were similar between the two treatment
groups. The change of mTSS was comparable between the two treatment groups (mean
change: 0.38 in SB2 vs. 0.37 in INF; cumulative probability plot is shown in Figure
2). The safety profile of SB2 was generally comparable to that of INF (Table 1).
The overall anti-drug antibody positivity up to week 54 was 62.4% in SB2 and
57.5% in INF (p-value = 0.270).

Conclusion: Up to 54 weeks, SB2 showed comparable long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity
to those of INF and well tolerated. In particular, radiographic progression was
comparable between SB2 and INF at 54 weeks.

Reference

1. Choe
JY et al. EULAR 2015, SAT0152

Figure 1. ACR20, 50, 70 Response Rates at Week 54 in
the Full Analysis Set (FAS)*

*FAS follows
the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle and includes all patients with at least
1 dose of the study drug. Patients without response at week 54 were considered
as non-responders.

Figure 2. Cumulative Probability of Change in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) from baseline at Week 54


Table 1. Safety Profile of the Study Population up to 54 weeks

Number of patients with

SB2 (N=290)*

INF (N=293)

n

%

n

%

At least 1 TEAE

179

61.7

191

65.2

At least 1 SAE

29

10.0

31

10.6

Total infections

85

29.3

110

37.5

Serious infections

9

3.1

6

2.0

Tuberculosis

1

0.3

1

0.3

Infusion-related reaction

17

5.9

15

5.1

Malignancy

2

0.7

0

0.0

Death

0

0

1

0.3

SAE: serious adverse event; TEAE: treatment-emergent adverse event.

*1 patient dropped out before receiving at least 1 dose of SB2.


Disclosure: J. Y. Choe, Samsung Bioepis, 2,Samsung Bioepis, 5; N. Prodanovic, Samsung Bioepis, 2; J. Niebrzydowski, Samsung Bioepis, 2; I. Staykov, Samsung Bioepis, 2; E. Dokoupilova, Samsung Bioepis, 2; A. Baranauskaite, Samsung Bioepis, AbbVie, 2; R. Yatsyshyn, Samsung Bioepis, 2; M. Mekic, Samsung Bioepis, 2; W. Porawska, Samsung Bioepis, 2; H. Ciferska, Samsung Bioepis, 2; K. Jedrychowicz-Rosiak, Samsung Bioepis, 2; A. Zielinska, Samsung Bioepis, 2; J. Choi, Samsung Bioepis, 3; Y. H. Rho, Samsung Bioepis, 3; J. S. Smolen, AbbVie, Jassen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 2,AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro-Pharma, Celgene, GSK, Jassen, Lilly, Medimmune, MSD, Norvartis-Sandoz, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Choe JY, Prodanovic N, Niebrzydowski J, Staykov I, Dokoupilova E, Baranauskaite A, Yatsyshyn R, Mekic M, Porawska W, Ciferska H, Jedrychowicz-Rosiak K, Zielinska A, Choi J, Rho YH, Smolen JS. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study Comparing SB2, an Infliximab Biosimilar, to the Infliximab Reference Product (Remicade®) in Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy: 54-Week Results [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-double-blind-phase-iii-study-comparing-sb2-an-infliximab-biosimilar-to-the-infliximab-reference-product-remicade-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-despi/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-double-blind-phase-iii-study-comparing-sb2-an-infliximab-biosimilar-to-the-infliximab-reference-product-remicade-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-despi/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology