ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1936

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of a Proposed Adalimumab Biosimilar (GP2017) with Reference Adalimumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Piotr Wiland1, Sławomir Jeka2, Eva Dokoupilová3,4, Juan Manuel Miranda Limón5, Julia Jauch-Lembach6, Anjali Thakur6, Halimuniyazi Haliduola6 and Norman B Gaylis7, 1Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland, 2Collegium Medicum UMK, 2nd University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland, 3MEDICAL PLUS s.r.o., Uherské Hradiště, Czech Republic, 4Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical sciences, Brno, Czech Republic, 5RM Pharma Specialists, Mexico City, Mexico, 6Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany, 7Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties, Aventura, FL

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, anti-TNF therapy, biosimilars, clinical trials and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: 4M106 ACR Abstract: RA–Treatments III: New Compounds & Biosimilars (1935–1940)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: GP2017, a proposed adalimumab biosimilar, matched reference adalimumab (refADL) in preclinical and pharmacokinetics studies.1,2 The confirmatory efficacy and safety study in patients with plaque-type psoriasis demonstrated equivalent efficacy and similar safety of GP2017 and refADL.3

This Phase III study compares efficacy and safety of GP2017 and refADL in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including methotrexate (NCT02744755). The study was designed to demonstrate similar efficacy of GP2017 and refADL over 24 weeks of treatment, and to evaluate long-term safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of GP2017 up to Week (Wk) 48. Data from randomization to Wk 24 are presented.

Methods:

Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 40 mg subcutaneous GP2017 or refADL every other week from Wk 0 to Wk 22. The primary endpoint was change in Disease Activity Score-28 including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) from baseline at Wk 12. Therapeutic equivalence was confirmed if the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the difference in DAS28-CRP change from baseline (BL) at Wk 12 between GP2017 and refADL were completely contained within the predefined equivalence margin of [-0.6,0.6]. Secondary endpoints included time-weighted averaged change in DAS28-CRP from BL to Wk 24, safety and immunogenicity.

Results:

In total, 353 patients were randomized to receive GP2017 (n=177) or refADL (n=176). Using a mixed model repeated measures method, mean change from BL at Wk 12 in DAS28-CRP was -2.16 for GP2017 (n=140) and -2.18 for refADL (n=144) (∆=0.02; 95% CI: -0.24,0.27). Time-weighted averaged change from BL in DAS28-CRP until Wk 24 was -1.85 for GP2017 (n=127) and -1.93 for refADL (n=138) (∆=0.08; 95% CI: -0.11,0.27). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 61.6% of patients in GP2017 group and 60.2% of patients in refADL group (Table). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Infections and infestations were most common TEAEs, of those mild viral upper respiratory tract infections were reported by 14.7% and 9.1% of patients in GP2017 and refADL groups, respectively. Injection site reactions occurred in 7 (4.0%) and 11 (6.3%) patients in GP2017 and refADL groups. From BL to Wk 24, antidrug antibodies were detected in 21.8% and 24.4% of patients treated with GP2017 and refADL, of which >70% in both groups were neutralizing.

Conclusion:

These data demonstrate equivalent efficacy of proposed adalimumab biosimilar GP2017 and refADL in patients with moderate-to-severe RA. Safety and immunogenicity of GP2017 and refADL were similar and consistent with clinical experience with refADL.

References

1da Silva A, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:S284

2Jauch-Lembach J, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69 (suppl 10)

3Blauvelt A, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69 (suppl 10)

Table. Summary of safety and immunogenicity for the proposed biosimilar adalimumab, GP2017, and reference adalimumab from baseline to Week 24 (analysis set)

GP2017
(n=177)

Reference adalimumab (refADL) (n=176)

Total
(N=353)

Adverse events, n (%)

≥1 TEAE

109 (61.6)

106 (60.2)

215 (60.9)

Most commonly affected SOC
(≥10% in any treatment group)

Infections and infestations

63 (35.6)

65 (36.9)

128 (36.3)

Gastrointestinal disorders

21 (11.9)

17 (9.7)

38 (10.8)

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

21 (11.9)

14 (8.0)

35 (9.9)

≥1 treatment-related TEAE

42 (23.7)

32 (18.2)

74 (21.0)

≥1 severe TEAE

3 (1.7)

3 (1.7)

6 (1.7)

≥1 SAE

5 (2.8)

4 (2.3)

9 (2.5)

Injection site reaction

7 (4.0)

11 (6.3)

18 (5.1)

Drug discontinuation due to TEAE

2 (1.1)

2 (1.1)

4 (1.1)

Death

0

0

0

Incidence of ADAs from baseline to Week 24, n/n (%)

Positive

36/165 (21.8)

41/168 (24.4)

77/333 (23.1)

Neutralizing

27/36 (75.0)

30/41 (73.2)

57/77 (74.0)

ADAs, antidrug antibodies; AE, adverse event; SAE, serious adverse event; SOC, system organ class; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event


Disclosure: P. Wiland, Eli Lilly and Co., Gedeon, Novartis, Sandoz, 5,AbbVie Inc., MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, 8; S. Jeka, None; E. Dokoupilová, None; J. M. Miranda Limón, None; J. Jauch-Lembach, Sandoz / Hexal AG, 3; A. Thakur, Sandoz / Hexal AG, 3; H. Haliduola, Sandoz / Hexal AG, 3; N. B. Gaylis, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wiland P, Jeka S, Dokoupilová E, Miranda Limón JM, Jauch-Lembach J, Thakur A, Haliduola H, Gaylis NB. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of a Proposed Adalimumab Biosimilar (GP2017) with Reference Adalimumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-double-blind-parallel-group-multicenter-study-to-compare-the-efficacy-safety-and-immunogenicity-of-a-proposed-adalimumab-biosimilar-gp2017-with-reference-adalimumab-in-patients-with/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-double-blind-parallel-group-multicenter-study-to-compare-the-efficacy-safety-and-immunogenicity-of-a-proposed-adalimumab-biosimilar-gp2017-with-reference-adalimumab-in-patients-with/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology