ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2845

A Randomized, Clinical Trial to Assess the Relative Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Doses of Etoricoxib in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Eva Balazcs1, Désirée van der Heijde2, Narinder Rawal3, Joachim Sieper4, Boyd Scott5, Kara Bickham6, Nancy Frontera6, Paul Stryszak6, Dimitris Papanicolaou6, Zoran Popmihajlov6 and Paul Peloso6, 1Department of Neuromusculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Sima F, Szentes, Hungary, 2University Hospital, Maastricht, Netherlands, 3Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden, 4University Clinic Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany, 5Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, 6Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and clinical trials, COX inhibitors

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

 

Background/Purpose:

Etoricoxib 90 mg, a
selective COX-2 inhibitor, provides symptom relief in ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
patients. A prior study established etoricoxib 90 mg as safe and effective in
treating AS symptoms. The current study was conducted to determine the efficacy
and safety of etoricoxib 60 mg in AS patients.

Methods:

This was a 2-part,
double-blind, active comparator-controlled non-inferiority study in AS. Part I
(6 weeks) assessed the efficacy of etoricoxib 60 mg and 90 mg compared to
naproxen 1000 mg. Part II (6 weeks) evaluated whether subjects with inadequate
pain relief on etoricoxib 60 mg in Part I benefited from increasing to etoricoxib
90 mg in Part II.  Patients were ≥18 years of age with AS as classified
by the Modified New York criteria and a history of clinical response with
NSAIDs. Patients were required to have a disease flare after NSAID washout prior
to randomization. Eligible patients were randomized to naproxen; etoricoxib 60
mg in Part I & II; etoricoxib 60 mg in Part I 90 mg in Part II; or etoricoxib
90 mg in Part I & II in a 4:9:9:4 ratio respectively. The primary objective
was to compare the effect on spinal pain intensity (SPI) score (0 to 100 mm VAS)
after 6-weeks of treatment in Part I. The non-inferiority margin was set at 8 mm
for the SPI measure based on prior literature findings.  The overall safety and
tolerability of etoricoxib in AS patients was assessed including independent adjudication of all thrombotic
cardiovascular and serious upper GI AEs.

Results:

In total,
1015 patients were randomized; 70.9% were male; the mean age was 45.2 years, 84.6%
were Caucasian, 919 patients completed Part I and all continued to Part II. In
Part I, both etoricoxib doses were non-inferior to naproxen based on change in SPI
score from baseline (Table 1A). There was a mean decrease of ~2 mm SPI score for
etoricoxib 90 mg versus 60 mg; (Table 1B). Patients who had inadequate pain response
in Part I with 60 mg, had a small but significant improvement in SPI score after
switching to 90 mg (Table 1C). In both Part I and II, the incidences of AEs,
drug-related AEs, and SAEs were similar between the 3 treatment groups.
Independently adjudicated AEs were also similar between treatment groups).

Conclusion:

Both doses of etoricoxib
were non-inferior to naproxen. Etoricoxib 60 mg and 90 mg had similar efficacy in
relieving the pain associated with AS. Among inadequate responders to etoricoxib
60 mg, dose escalation to 90 mg daily resulted in a statistically significant
decrease in SPI score as compared to those subjects remaining on 60 mg. Both
etoricoxib 90 mg and 60 mg were well tolerated, and no new safety signals were
identified.


Disclosure: E. Balazcs, None; D. van der Heijde, Merck Human Health, 5; N. Rawal, None; J. Sieper, Abbott, Merck, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Janssen, 5,Abbott, Merck, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Janssen, 8; B. Scott, Merck Pharmaceuticals, 3,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 1; K. Bickham, Merck Pharmaceuticals, 3,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 1; N. Frontera, Merck Pharmaceuticals, 3,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 1; P. Stryszak, Merck Pharmaceuticals, 3,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 1; D. Papanicolaou, Merck Pharmaceuticals, 3,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 1; Z. Popmihajlov, Merck Pharmaceuticals, 3,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 1; P. Peloso, Merck Pharmaceuticals, 3,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Balazcs E, van der Heijde D, Rawal N, Sieper J, Scott B, Bickham K, Frontera N, Stryszak P, Papanicolaou D, Popmihajlov Z, Peloso P. A Randomized, Clinical Trial to Assess the Relative Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Doses of Etoricoxib in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-clinical-trial-to-assess-the-relative-efficacy-and-tolerability-of-two-doses-of-etoricoxib-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-randomized-clinical-trial-to-assess-the-relative-efficacy-and-tolerability-of-two-doses-of-etoricoxib-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology