ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2824

A Profile of the Efficacy of Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Results of a 52-Week, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, International Study

Arthur Kavanaugh1, Dennis L. Decktor2, Chunpeng Fan3, Janet van Adelsberg2, Renata Martincova4 and Mark C. Genovese5, 1University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 2Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, 3Biostatistics, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, 4Sanofi Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, 5Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs, effective leader and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), IL-6

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy V: Novel Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Late in Development

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose Interleukin-6 (IL-6) regulates a diverse array of activities that may underlie systemic and local symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The efficacy of sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against IL-6R, has recently been investigated in the randomized, double-blind, placebo(pbo)-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 part of the MOBILITY study.1 This analysis expands the profile to the entire 52-week duration of the trial.

Methods Adults with active, moderate-to-severe RA and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) were randomized 1:1:1 to pbo + MTX, sarilumab 150 mg or 200 mg q2w + MTX for 52 wks. 3 co-primary endpoints associated with RA activity (signs & symptoms, physical function, and structural damage) were investigated: proportion of patients achieving ACR20 response at Wk 24; change from baseline in HAQ-DI at Wk 16; and change from baseline in mTSS at Wk 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints included major clinical response at Wk 52, ACR50 and ACR70 responses, reduction in DAS28-CRP, and CDAI.

Results Sarilumab 150 mg and 200 mg q2w + MTX provided statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in all co-primary efficacy endpoints (ACR20, HAQ-DI, and mTSS) and secondary efficacy endpoints vs pbo + MTX (Table). ACR 20 response rates increased by Wk 2 and remained significantly higher in both sarilumab + MTX groups vs pbo + MTX through Wk 52 (p<0.0001). Change from baseline in the ACR core set of disease activity measures, swollen and tender joint counts, was significantly higher in the sarilumab + MTX groups vs pbo + MTX (Table). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the sarilumab + MTX groups maintained CDAI remission vs pbo + MTX (Wks 4–52; p<0.0001). DAS28-CRP scores were significantly improved vs pbo + MTX at Wks 2–52 (p<0.0001) in sarilumab + MTX-treated patients, who achieved DAS28-CRP remission at Wks 24 and 52 (Table). The proportion of HAQ-DI responders at Wks 16, 24 and 52 was significantly higher (p<0.0001) with sarilumab + MTX vs pbo + MTX at each timepoint (Table). Mean change from baseline in mTSS at Wk 52 with sarilumab + MTX was significantly higher vs pbo + MTX (Table). Most common TEAEs included infections and injection site reactions. A higher incidence of serious infections was observed with sarilumab. Lab abnormalities included decreases in neutrophils and increases in transaminases and lipids.

Conclusion These additional analyses of patients with active RA and an inadequate response to MTX showed that treatment with subcutaneous sarilumab at 150 mg and 200 mg q2w + MTX improved the full range of reported outcomes in a robust and durable manner that was maintained over this 52 week-trial.

Reference: 1. Genovese M et al. Abstr. No. EULAR14-SCIE-3001 presented at EULAR 2014, Paris, France.


Table. Efficacy results

 

Sarilumab

Placebo + MTX (n=398)

150 mg q2w + MTX (n=400)

200 mg q2w + MTX (n=399)

ACR20 response – Wk 24, n (%)

133 (33.4%)

232 (58.0%)*

265 (66.4%)*

ACR50 response – Wk 24, n (%)

66 (16.6%)

148 (37.0%)*

182 (45.6%)*

ACR70 response – Wk 24, n (%)

29 (7.3%)

79 (19.8%)*

99 (24.8%)*

mTSS, mean change from BL – Wk 52

2.8

0.9*

0.3*

Major clinical response (ACR70 response maintained for 24 weeks), n (%)

12 (3.0%)

51 (12.8%)*

59 (14.8%)*

ACR disease activity measures, adj. mean change from BL – Wk 24

 

 

 

Swollen joint count

–6.6

–10.6*

–11.2*

Tender joint count 

–10.1

–16.9*

–17.4*

HAQ-DI, adj. mean change from BL               – – Wk 16

–0.3

–0.5*

–0.6*

– Wk 24

–0.4

–0.6*

–0.6*

– Wk 52

–0.5

–0.7*

–0.8*

DAS28–CRP

 

 

 

LS mean change from BL – Wk 24

–1.17

–2.45*

–2.82*

LS mean change from BL – Wk 52

–1.36

–2.78*

–2.95*

Clinical remission# – Wk 24, n (%)

 40 (10.1%)

111 (27.8%)*

136 (34.1%)*

Clinical remission# – Wk 52, n (%)

34 (8.5%)

124 (31.0%)*

136 (34.1%)*

CDAI

 

 

 

LS mean change from BL – Wk 24

–14.47

–23.89*

25.79*

LS mean change from BL – Wk 52

–17.50

–26.96*

–27.26*

Remission (≤2.8) – Wk 24, n (%)

20 (5.0%)

41 (10.3%)†

55 (13.8%)*

Remission (≤2.8) – Wk 52, n (%)

19 (4.8%)

59 (14.8%)*

72 (18.0%)*

No radiographic progression at Wk 52, n (%)

154 (38.7%)

191 (47.8%)‡

222 (55.6%)*

*p<0.0001 vs placebo + MTX; †p=0.0053; ‡p<0.01 vs placebo + MTX; #score of <2.6; MTX, methotrexate; BL, baseline; LS, least squared; ACR 20/50/70, American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% improvement criteria; mTSS, van der Heijde modified total Sharp score; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; HAQ-DI responders, >0.3 improvement in HAQ-DI from baseline; DAS28-CRP, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-Reactive Protein; DAS28-CRP remission, DAS28-CRP <2.6; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CDAI remission, CDAI ≤2.8.

 


Disclosure:

A. Kavanaugh,

Sanofi ,

2;

D. L. Decktor,

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

3,

Johnson & Johnson,

1;

C. Fan,

Sanofi ,

1,

Sanofi ,

3;

J. van Adelsberg,

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

3,

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

1;

R. Martincova,

Sanofi ,

3;

M. C. Genovese,

Eli Lilly and Company,

2,

Eli Lilly and Company,

5,

Sanofi ,

2,

Sanofi ,

5,

Regeneron,

2,

Regeneron,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-profile-of-the-efficacy-of-sarilumab-plus-methotrexate-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-results-of-a-52-week-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-international-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology