ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0448

A Pregnant Lupus Patient’s Journey: Single-Center Outcomes and Opportunities

Divya Singh1, Maya Faison2, Molly Leavitt3, Megan Clowse4 and Cuoghi Edens5, 1University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 2University of Chicago, Chapel Hill, NC, 3MacNeal Hospital/Loyola Medicine, Chicago, IL, 4Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC, 5Section of Pediatric Rheumatology, Section of Rheumatology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: pregnancy, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Nearly half of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients will experience pregnancy complications. These complications include increased rates of prematurity, miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, and mortality. Maternal and fetal complications can be decreased with pregnancy planning. This retrospective chart review aimed to demonstrate the characteristics of pregnant SLE patients at a single institution and identify who cared for these patients in the perinatal period to determine where interventions to improve lupus pregnancy planning and management can be implemented.

Methods: This retrospective chart review identified adult patients diagnosed with SLE who were pregnant between October 2021 and October 2023. Patient data was obtained from the electronic medical record.  Demographics, SLE manifestations, rheumatologic medications, and pregnancy/birth outcomes were extracted from all available healthcare systems. Next, patient appointments attended before and during pregnancy were reviewed. For patients not seen by a rheumatologist in the year before conception, specialists visited in the three years before pregnancy end were noted. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results: Demographics 

50 patients were initially identified. Those without a definitive diagnosis of SLE or pregnancy during the specified time frame (n=23) were excluded. Patients’ demographics were recorded (Table 1). While there was diversity across patient ages, the majority of patients were African-American (n=16, 59.4%) and non-Hispanic (n=22, 81.5%). The most common manifestations of SLE included hypertensive disorders (n=12, 44.4%), lupus nephritis (n=11, 40.7%), and positive antiphospholipid antibodies (n=10, 37.0%). 

Patient Outcomes 

Differences were identified between patients who did and did not see a rheumatologist within one year before conception (Table 2). Patients seen by a rheumatologist were more likely to be on DMARDs, less likely to have pregnancy complications, and less likely to require an emergent delivery. For pregnancies carried beyond 20 weeks, the average gestational age at delivery was 36 weeks + 6 days for patients who were seen by a rheumatologist vs 34 weeks + 1 day for patients who were not. 

Providers Seen and Opportunities for Intervention 

8 patients did not see a rheumatologist within one year of conception but did see other providers in the three years preceding pregnancy end (Figure 3). The providers who referred patients to a rheumatologist were primary care, obstetrics and gynecology, and maternal-fetal medicine. 

Conclusion: This single-institution chart review demonstrated differences in pregnancy outcomes, including gestational age at delivery and percentage of emergent deliveries, between patients who did and did not see a rheumatologist in the year before conception. Larger chart reviews are needed to establish whether these differences are significant. Providers at our institution who did not refer patients with SLE to rheumatology to re-establish care included gastroenterology, cardiology, nephrology, and emergency medicine. These specialties present an institutional opportunity for interventions to improve perinatal outcomes for SLE patients.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: D. Singh: None; M. Faison: None; M. Leavitt: None; M. Clowse: AstraZeneca, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; C. Edens: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Singh D, Faison M, Leavitt M, Clowse M, Edens C. A Pregnant Lupus Patient’s Journey: Single-Center Outcomes and Opportunities [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-pregnant-lupus-patients-journey-single-center-outcomes-and-opportunities/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-pregnant-lupus-patients-journey-single-center-outcomes-and-opportunities/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology