ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 8L

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study Comparing SB5, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, with Adalimumab Reference Product (Humira®) in Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy (24-week Results)

Michael E. Weinblatt1, Asta Baranauskaite2, Jaroslaw Niebrzydowski3, Eva Dokoupilova4, Agnieszka Zielinska5, Karina Sitek-Ziolkowska6, Janusz Jaworski7, Artur Racewicz8, Margarita Pileckyte2, Krystyna Jedrychowicz-Rosiak9, Vyacheslav Zhdan10, Soo Yeon Cheong11 and Jeehoon Ghil11, 1Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania, 3Medica Pro Familia, Gdynia, Poland, 4Medical Plus s.r.o., Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic, 5Medica pro Familia, Warszawa, Poland, 6Medica pro Familia, Katowice, Poland, 7Reumatika Centrum Reumatologi, Warszawa, Poland, 8Zdrowie Osteo- Medic s.c, Bialystok, Poland, 9Mazowieckie Centrum Badañ Klinicznych, Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland, 10M.V.Sklifosovskyi Poltava Regional Clinical Hospital, Poltava, Ukraine, 11Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Incheon, South Korea

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: October 27, 2015

Keywords: Biosimilars and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Late-Breaking 2015

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: ACR Late-breaking Abstract Poster Presentations

Session Type: ACR Late-breaking Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

SB5
is a biologic agent developed as a biosimilar of the adalimumab reference product (ADL). Equivalence in
pharmacokinetics (PK) between SB5 and ADL in healthy subjects has been
demonstrated1 in a phase I study. This phase III study was a
randomized, double-blind, multicenter study to compare the efficacy, safety,
PK, and immunogenicity of SB5 with ADL in patients with moderate to severe
rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) treatment up to 52 weeks.
Results up to 24 weeks are presented in this abstract.

Methods:

Patients
with moderate to severe RA despite MTX treatment were randomly assigned to
receive 40 mg of either SB5 or ADL administered subcutaneously every other week
for 24 weeks. At Week 24, patients in ADL group were randomized again to
receive 40 mg of either SB5 or ADL for additional 28 weeks. Patients in
SB5 group continued to receive SB5. The primary endpoint was the ACR20 response
rate at Week 24. Other secondary efficacy endpoints and safety were measured.

Results:

A
total of 544 patients were randomized to either SB5 (N=271) or ADL (N=273).
Baseline demographic and disease characteristic were comparable between two
treatment groups. The ACR20 response rate at Week 24 in the per-protocol set
(PPS) was 72.5% (174/240) in SB5 and 72.0% (170/236) in ADL. The 95% confidence
interval (CI) of the treatment difference adjusted by region and baseline
C-reactive protein was –7.66% to 8.30%, which was within the pre-defined
equivalence margin of [–15%, 15%]. The ACR20 response rate at Week 24 was shown
to be equivalent in the full analysis set as well (95% CI: -7.03%, 8.56%) when
non-responder analysis was applied. The 95% CI of the estimated difference
between the time-response curves of SB5 and ADL in the PPS met the pre-defined
equivalence margin (Figure). The ACR50 response rates at Week 24 in the PPS
were 38.3% vs. 39.8% and the ACR70 response rates were 19.2% vs. 20.3% in SB5
and ADL, respectively. The safety profile of SB5 was generally similar to that
of ADL (Table). The overall incidence of anti-drug antibody up to Week 24 was
32.8% in SB5 vs. 31.7% in ADL. The PK profile was also comparable between the
two treatment groups.

Conclusion:

SB5
was shown to be equivalent in terms of clinical efficacy when compared with
ADL. SB5 was well tolerated with similar safety profile, PK, and immunogenicity
to ADL.

Table.
Safety Results

Patients with

SB5 (N=268*)

ADL (N=273)

n

(%)

n

(%)

At least 1 TEAE

96

(35.8)

110

(40.3)

At least 1 serious TEAE

3

(1.1)

7

(2.6)

Serious infection

1

(0.3)

2

 (0.7)

Tuberculosis

0

(0.0)

0

(0.0)

Injection site reactions**

8

(3.0)

8

(2.9)

Malignancy

0

(0.0)

2

(0.7)

Death

0

(0.0)

2

(0.7)

TEAE: treatment-emergent adverse event

*Three patients withdrew before receiving at least one dose of the study drug.

**Numbers are based on high-level group term of administration site reactions.

 

Figure. Estimated
Time-response Curves of ACR20 Response Rate up to Week 24 (PPS)

 

Reference

1.
Shin DH et al. EULAR 2015, FRI0110.

 


Disclosure: M. E. Weinblatt, Samsung Bioepis, Merck, Abbvie, Amgen, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, UCB, 5,Bristol Myers Squibb, UCB, Amgen, 2; A. Baranauskaite, Samsung Bioepis, AbbVie, 2; J. Niebrzydowski, Samsung Bioepis, 2; E. Dokoupilova, Samsung Bioepis, 2; A. Zielinska, Samsung Bioepis, 2; K. Sitek-Ziolkowska, Samsung Bioepis, 2; J. Jaworski, Samsung Bioepis, 2; A. Racewicz, Samsung Bioepis, 2; M. Pileckyte, Samsung Bioepis, 2; K. Jedrychowicz-Rosiak, Samsung Bioepis, 2; V. Zhdan, Samsung Bioepis, 2; S. Y. Cheong, Samsung Bioepis, 3; J. Ghil, Samsung Bioepis, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Weinblatt ME, Baranauskaite A, Niebrzydowski J, Dokoupilova E, Zielinska A, Sitek-Ziolkowska K, Jaworski J, Racewicz A, Pileckyte M, Jedrychowicz-Rosiak K, Zhdan V, Cheong SY, Ghil J. A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study Comparing SB5, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, with Adalimumab Reference Product (Humira®) in Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy (24-week Results) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-iii-randomized-double-blind-clinical-study-comparing-sb5-an-adalimumab-biosimilar-with-adalimumab-reference-product-humira-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-iii-randomized-double-blind-clinical-study-comparing-sb5-an-adalimumab-biosimilar-with-adalimumab-reference-product-humira-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology