ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 602

A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Apremilast, an Oral Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor, for Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Long-Term (52-Week) Improvements in Physical Function

Alvin Wells1, Jacob A. Aelion2, Adewale O. Adebajo3, Alan Kivitz4, Paul Bird5, ChiaChi Hu6, Randall M. Stevens6 and Christopher J. Edwards7, 1Rheumatology & Immunotherapy Center, Franklin, WI, 2West Tennessee Research Institute, Jackson, TN, 3University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 4Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 5Combined Rheumatology Practice, Kogarah, Australia, 6Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ, 7University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Apremilast (APR) is a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor that helps regulate the immune response that causes inflammation and skin disease associated with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). PALACE 4 compared APR efficacy and safety with placebo in patients with active PsA who were DMARD-naïve. We evaluated the impact of APR over 52 weeks on physical function among PALACE 4 patients.

Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, APR 20 mg BID (APR20), or APR 30 mg BID (APR30). Patients whose swollen and tender joint counts had not improved by ≥20% at Week 16 were considered non-responders and were required to be re-randomized (1:1) to APR20 or APR30 if they were initially randomized to placebo, or continued on their initial apremilast dose. At Week 24, all remaining placebo patients were re-randomized to APR20 or APR30. This analysis reports data for Weeks 0 to 52. Physical function was evaluated using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Function (PF) domain and physical component summary (PCS) scores. Proportions of patients initially randomized to APR achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds at Week 52 for HAQ-DI (≥0.13 or ≥0.30)1,2 and SF-36v2 PF and PCS (both ≥2.5)3 were determined.

Results: At Week 16, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with APR achieved a modified ACR20 response vs placebo (primary endpoint). Mean changes in HAQ-DI at Week 16 (key secondary endpoint) were 0.03 (placebo), -0.17 (APR20; P=0.0008), and -0.21 (APR30; P<0.0001). Among patients who were treated with APR continuously through 52 weeks, sustained improvement in HAQ-DI was observed. Mean change in HAQ-DI was -0.32 (APR20) and -0.39 (APR30) at Week 52, exceeding MCID thresholds of ≥0.13 or ≥0.30 (Table). At Week 52, 56.8% (APR20) and 59.0% (APR30) achieved HAQ-DI MCID ≥0.13 and 48.5% and 48.9% achieved MCID ≥0.30, respectively. Week 52 mean changes from baseline in SF-36v2 PF (APR20: 4.61; APR30: 6.41) and PCS (APR20: 5.55; APR30: 6.67) exceeded the MCID threshold (≥2.5). At Week 52, 57.6% of APR20 and APR30 patients achieved SF-36v2 PF MCID, and 60.6% (APR20) and 69.1% (APR30) achieved SF-36v2 PCS MCID. The most common adverse events reported during the placebo-controlled period were nausea (12.6%), diarrhea (9.4%), and headache (6.0%). The safety profile of APR for up to 52 weeks was similar to that observed with APR for up to 24 weeks of treatment (placebo-controlled period).

Conclusion: Over 52 weeks, APR continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in physical function in active PsA patients who were DMARD-naive. APR demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and was generally well tolerated for up to 52 weeks.

Physical Function at Week 52 in Patients Receiving APR From Baseline

 

APR20

n=132

APR30

n=139

HAQ-DI*

 

 

Baseline, mean

1.12

1.09

Mean change from baseline

-0.32

-0.39

Patients achieving MCID ≥0.13‡, %

56.8

59.0

Patients achieving MCID ≥0.30‡, %

48.5

48.9

SF-36v2 PFµ

 

 

Baseline, mean

35.8

35.6

Mean change from baseline

4.61

6.41

Patients achieving MCID ≥2.5‡, %

57.6

57.6

SF-36v2 PCSµ

 

 

Baseline, mean

35.6

36.4

Mean change from baseline

5.55

6.67

Patients achieving MCID ≥2.5‡, %

60.6

69.1

Note: The n represents the number of patients with a baseline value and a value at Week 52. *Decrease or µIncrease in score indicates improvement. ‡Pre-specified thresholds based on literature1-3 at time of protocol and analysis.

References: 1. Kwok T. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:1024. 2. Mease PJ. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2461. 3. Revicki DA. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:75.

 



Disclosure:

A. Wells,

Celgene Corporation,

2;

J. A. Aelion,

Ardea, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Centocor, Galapagos, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Human Genome Sciences, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Mesoblast, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc, Roche, UCB Biosciences, Sanofi-Aventis, Taked,

2,

Ardea, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Centocor, Galapagos, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Human Genome Sciences, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Mesoblast, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc, Roche, UCB Biosciences, Sanofi-Aventis, Taked,

5,

AbbVie, Amgen, and UCB,

8;

A. O. Adebajo,
None;

A. Kivitz,

Amgen, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB,

2,

Amgen, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

8;

P. Bird,

Celgene Corporation,

2;

C. Hu,

Celgene Corporation,

3,

Celgene Corporation,

1;

R. M. Stevens,

Celgene Corporation,

1,

Celgene Corporation,

3;

C. J. Edwards,

Celgene Corporation, Pfizer Inc, Roche, and Samsung,

2,

Celgene Corporation, Pfizer Inc, Roche, and Samsung,

5,

Abbott, Glaxo-SmithKline, Pfizer Inc, and Roche,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-3-randomized-controlled-trial-of-apremilast-an-oral-phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitor-for-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis-long-term-52-week-improvements-in-physical-function/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology