ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 198

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Febuxostat Extended- Versus Immediate-Release Formulations in Patients with Gout and Moderate Renal Impairment

Lhanoo Gunawardhana1, Michael A. Becker2, Andrew Whelton3, Barbara Hunt1, Majin Castillo1, Xinxin Dong1 and Kenneth Saag4, 1Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Deerfield, IL, 2Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 3Johns Hopkins University, Hunt Valley, MD, 4University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: febuxostat and gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies - Poster I: Clinical Practice

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Data generated by Phase 1 and 2 studies suggest that the extended-release (XR) formulation of febuxostat (FBX) may provide equal or better reduction in serum urate level (sUA) in patients (pts) with gout, with reduced exposure (Cmax and AUC), compared with an immediate-release (IR) formulation. This Phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FBX XR compared with FBX IR in pts with gout and moderate renal impairment.

Methods: In a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, pts with gout (sUA ≥8.0 mg/dL, moderate renal impairment [estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min and <60 mL/min], and ≥1 gout flare within the previous 12 months) received placebo or FBX XR 40 mg, XR 80 mg, IR 40 mg, or IR 80 mg once daily for 3 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of pts with sUA <5.0 mg/dL at Month 3. Secondary endpoints were proportions of pts with at least 1 flare requiring treatment during the 3-month treatment period and of pts with sUA <6.0 mg/dL at Month 3.

Results: A total of 189 pts received treatment with placebo (n=38) or FBX XR 40 mg (n=39), XR 80 mg (n=38), IR 40 mg (n=37), or IR 80 mg (n=37). A higher proportion of pts receiving FBX XR 40 mg achieved sUA <5.0 mg/dL versus (vs) IR 40 mg at Month 3 (35.9% vs 13.5%, respectively; p=0.034). All FBX groups showed a higher proportion of pts with at least 1 flare during treatment compared with placebo-treated pts, but a smaller proportion of pts in the FBX XR 40-mg group experienced flares compared with IR 40 mg (23.1% vs 40.5%, respectively). Additionally, a numerically higher proportion of pts achieved sUA <6 mg/dL with FBX XR 40 mg compared with IR 40 mg (53.8% vs 32.4%, respectively). FBX XR 80 mg did not differentiate from IR 80 mg for the primary or secondary endpoints. Primary and secondary endpoint results are shown (Figure). Treatment-emergent and treatment-related adverse events were infrequent and generally did not differ among treatment groups.

Conclusion: Significantly more pts receiving FBX XR 40 mg achieved the primary endpoint of sUA reduction to <5.0 mg/dL at the Month 3 visit compared with FBX IR 40 mg. There was a trend toward lower flare rates in the FBX XR 40 mg vs the IR 40 mg group. Overall, incidence rates of treatment-emergent and treatment-related adverse events were low.


Disclosure: L. Gunawardhana, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, 3,Takeda Pharmaceuticals, 1; M. A. Becker, Takeda, Ardea/AstraZeneca, Ironwood, Horizon, 2,Takeda, Ardea/AstraZeneca, Ironwood, Horizon, CymaBay, Pfizer, SelectaBio, 5; A. Whelton, Takeda, 8; B. Hunt, Takeda, 3; M. Castillo, Takeda, 3; X. Dong, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, 3; K. Saag, Takeda, Horizon, Ardea/AstraZeneca, 2,Takeda, Horizon, Ardea/AstraZeneca, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gunawardhana L, Becker MA, Whelton A, Hunt B, Castillo M, Dong X, Saag K. A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Febuxostat Extended- Versus Immediate-Release Formulations in Patients with Gout and Moderate Renal Impairment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-study-to-evaluate-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-febuxostat-extended-versus-immediate-release-formulations-in-patients-with-gout-and-moderate-renal-impairment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-study-to-evaluate-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-febuxostat-extended-versus-immediate-release-formulations-in-patients-with-gout-and-moderate-renal-impairment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology