ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 7L

A Phase 2 Study of Safety and Efficacy of Anabasum (JBT-101), a Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonist, in Refractory Skin-Predominant Dermatomyositis

Victoria P. Werth1, Emily Hejazi2, Sandra M. Pena1, Jessica S. Haber3, Joyce Okawa1, Rui Feng4, Kirubel Gabre2, Josef Concha2, Caitlin Cornwall5, Nancy Dgetluck6, Scott Constantine5 and Barbara White5, 1Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 3Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 4Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 5Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Norwood, MA, 6Biostatistics, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Norwood, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: October 19, 2017

Keywords: Amyopathic dermatomyositis, cannabinoid, clinical trials, Late-Breaking 2017, patient outcomes and quality of life

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: ACR Late-Breaking Abstract Poster

Session Type: ACR Late-breaking Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Effective treatment options are limited for refractory skin disease in dermatomyositis (DM). Anabasum is a non-immunosuppressive, synthetic, oral preferential CB2 agonist that triggers resolution of innate immune responses and reduces cytokine production by PBMC from DM patients. This purpose of this study was to test safety and efficacy of anabasum in DM subjects with refractory, moderate-to-severely active skin disease.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled 16-week Phase 2 trial (JBT101-DM-001) enrolled adults with documented DM and a Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) activity score ≥ 14, minimal active muscle involvement and failure or intolerance to hydroxychloroquine and stable DM medications including immunosuppressants. Subjects received 2 escalating doses of anabasum (20 mg QD X 4 weeks, then 20 mg BID X 8 weeks) or PBO X 12 weeks. Subjects were followed off study drug X 4 weeks. Safety and efficacy outcomes were assessed from Day 1 through end of study at Week 16. The primary efficacy objective was to assess efficacy of anabasum using CDASI activity score.

Results: 11 adults each received anabasum and PBO (N = 22). Demographic and disease characteristics were similar in both cohorts. Both cohorts had mean CDASI activity scores in the severe range (33-35) despite immunosuppressants (19/22 subjects). Anabasum subjects had clinically meaningful improvement in CDASI activity scores with mean reduction ≥ 5 points at all visits after 4 weeks. Improvement had statistical significance at end of study (Fig. 1, P = 0.02, 2-sided MMRM) that first became apparent after 4 weeks. Anabasum provided greater improvement than placebo in CDAI damage index, patient-reported global skin disease and overall disease assessments, skin symptoms including photosensitivity and itch, fatigue, sleep, pain interference with activities, pain, and physical function (examples in Fig. 1). Improvements in secondary efficacy outcomes reached statistical significance (P ≤ 0.1, 1-sided MMRM) at multiple visits after week 4 (Fig. 1). There were no serious, severe or unexpected adverse events (AEs) related to anabasum. Tolerability of anabasum was excellent with no study drop-outs. Subjects in the anabasum cohort had numerically more mild AEs than placebo subjects (29 vs. 19) and fewer moderate AEs (4 vs. 7). AEs in ≥ 3 subjects in any cohort were diarrhea, dizziness (lightheadedness), fatigue and dry mouth.

Conclusion: Anabasum demonstrated consistent evidence of clinical benefit across multiple efficacy outcomes and had acceptable safety and tolerability in this Phase 2 trial in refractory skin disease in DM. Further evaluation of anabasum in the treatment of DM is warranted.


Disclosure: V. P. Werth, None; E. Hejazi, None; S. M. Pena, None; J. S. Haber, None; J. Okawa, None; R. Feng, None; K. Gabre, None; J. Concha, None; C. Cornwall, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1,Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 3; N. Dgetluck, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1,Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 3; S. Constantine, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1,Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 3; B. White, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 1,Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Werth VP, Hejazi E, Pena SM, Haber JS, Okawa J, Feng R, Gabre K, Concha J, Cornwall C, Dgetluck N, Constantine S, White B. A Phase 2 Study of Safety and Efficacy of Anabasum (JBT-101), a Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonist, in Refractory Skin-Predominant Dermatomyositis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-study-of-safety-and-efficacy-of-anabasum-jbt-101-a-cannabinoid-receptor-type-2-agonist-in-refractory-skin-predominant-dermatomyositis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-study-of-safety-and-efficacy-of-anabasum-jbt-101-a-cannabinoid-receptor-type-2-agonist-in-refractory-skin-predominant-dermatomyositis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology