ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 532

A Phase 2 Study of E6011, an Anti-Fractalkine Monoclonal Antibody, ㏌ Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Responding to Biologics

Yoshiya Tanaka1, Tsutomu Takeuchi 2, Hisashi Yamanaka 3, Toshihiro Nanki 4, Hisanori Umehara 5, Nobuyuki Yasuda 6, Fumitoshi Tago 7, Yasumi Kitahara 8, Makoto Kawakubo 7, Hayato Hisaki 8, Seiichiro Hojo 8, Tetsu Kawano 6 and Toshio Imai 6, 1University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 2Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 3Sanno Medical Center, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan, 5Nagahama City Hospital / Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nagahama, Japan, 6KAN Research Institute, Inc., Kobe, Japan, 7Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, 8Eisai Co., Ltd., Bunkyo-ku, Japan

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biologic drugs and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), chemokines, monoclonal antibodies

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Novel Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Fractalkine (CX3CL1, designated as FKN hereafter) is the sole member of the CX3C-chemokine which leads to dual actions, chemotaxis and cell adhesion for leukocytes expressing the cognate receptor, CX3CR1, during their migration. We have conducted clinical trials of E6011, a novel humanized anti-FKN monoclonal antibody, for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan1. This is the report of a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparison study of E6011 in RA patients inadequately responding to biologics (NCT02960490).

Methods: During the 24-week double-blind period, patients with moderately to severely active RA of inadequate response to biologics were randomly assigned to E6011 400 mg or placebo groups at a 1:1 ratio. Patients who continued the study beyond Week 12 were further allocated to E6011 200 mg or 400 mg at a 1:1 ratio within the initially assigned group. Patients received either E6011 400 mg or placebo at Weeks 0, 1, 2, and every 2 weeks subsequently until Week 10 and then E6011 200 mg or 400 mg every 2 weeks between Weeks 12 and 22 in a double-blind manner.

Results: A total of 64 subjects (33 in the placebo group and 31 in the E6011 400 mg group) received study drug. Of the 64 subjects, 55 completed and 9 discontinued study treatment prematurely during the 12-week placebo controlled double-blind period. The ACR20 response rate at Week 12 (non-responder imputation), the primary endpoint, was 27.3% (9/33 subjects) in the placebo group and 22.6% (7/31 subjects) in the E6011 group. ACR50 and ACR70 response rate at Week 12 were 3.0%, 0% in the placebo group and 9.7%, 3.2% in the E6011 group, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in any of the ACR components between the placebo and E6011 groups.

After completion of Week 12, 55 subjects were re-randomized and treated with E6011 200 mg or 400 mg (15 subjects for placebo/200 mg, 14 subjects for placebo/400 mg, 14 subjects for 400/200 mg, 12 subjects for 400/400 mg). Of the 55 subjects, 48 completed the planned treatment regimen and 7 discontinued study treatment prematurely between Week 12 and Week 24. During the Weeks 12-24, no apparent differences were found in any of the efficacy endpoints between the each groups during the Weeks 12–24 (after re-randomization). ACR20 response rate at Week 24 was 46.7% (7/15 subjects)  in the placebo/200 mg group, 28.6% (4/14 subjects) in the placebo/400 mg group, 21.4% (3/14 subjects) in the 400/200 mg group and 33.3% (4/12 subjects) in the 400/400 mg group.ACR50 and ACR70 response rate at Week 24 were 20.0%, 0% in the placebo/200 mg group, 0%, 0% in the placebo/400 mg group, 7.1%, 0% in the 400/200 mg group and 16.7%, 0% in the 400/400 mg group respectively.

During the Weeks 0-24, Adverse events that occurred in at least 2 subjects in the 400/200 mg group or 400/400 mg group were injection site erythema and nasopharyngitis. 

Conclusion: E6011 was well tolerated with no notable safety concerns, but did not show clear efficacy when administered subcutaneously for up to 24 weeks in RA patients with inadequately responding to biologics. Further investigation to seek an optimal clinical dose and evaluation period of E6011 are warranted.


Disclosure: Y. Tanaka, Abbvie, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Asahi-kasei, 2, Asahi-Kasei, 2, Asahi-kasei, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, 2, Astellas, 8, Astellas Pharma, 9, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, Astellas, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Pfizer, Sanofic, UCB, YL Biologics, 8, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers, 2, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 8, Chugai, 2, 8, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 8, Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Sanofi, Abbvie, Pfizer, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, 8, Eisai, 2, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 8, Genzyme, 5, Glaxo-Smithkline, UCB, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Takeda, Janssen, Asahi-kasei, 8, Janssen, 8, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 2, 8, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Takeda, Abbvie, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ono, MSD, Taisho-Toyama., 2, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai, Bristol-Myers, MSD, Astellas, Abbvie, Eisai, 2, Novartis, 8, Ono, 2, Pfizer, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 8, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 2, Takeda, 2, 8, Teijin, 8, UCB, 2, YL Biologics, 8; T. Takeuchi, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie GK, 2, 9, Asahi Kasei, 2, Asahikasei, 2, Asahikasei Pharma Corp., 2, Astellas, 2, 8, 9, Astellas Pharma Inc, 2, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 5, 8, 9, Astra Zeneca, 2, AstraZeneca, 8, AYUMI, 2, 9, AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2, BMS, 2, 8, Boehringer-ingelheim, 9, Bristol–Myers K.K., 9, Bristol-Myers, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8, Chugai, 2, 8, 9, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., 2, Daiichi Sankyo, 2, 8, 9, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 2, Eisai, 2, 5, 8, 9, Eisai Co., Ltd., 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 8, Eli Lilly Japan, 9, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 9, GlaxoSmithKline K.K, 9, GSK, 8, Janssen, 2, 8, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K, 9, Mitsubishi Tanabe, 2, 9, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., 2, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp, 2, 8, 9, Nippon Kayaku, 2, Nipponkayaku, 2, 9, Nipponkayaku Co.Ltd., 2, Novartis, 2, 8, Novartis Pharma K.K, 2, 9, Novartis Pharma K.K., 2, Pfizer, 2, 8, Pfizer Japan, 2, 9, Pfizer Japan Inc., 2, Sanofi, 8, Sanofi K.K, 9, Shionogi & Co., 2, Shionogi & Co., LTD., 2, Taiho, 2, 8, 9, Taisho, 9, Taisho Toyama, 2, 8, Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation, 2, Takeda, 2, 8, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 2, Teijin, 2, 8, UCB, 8, 9, UCB Japan, 9; H. Yamanaka, Teijin Pharma Limited, 5; T. Nanki, Eisai Co., Ltd., 2, 5, 8, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., 8, Teijin Pharma Ltd., 2, 8, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 2, 8, Bristol-Myers K.K., AbbVie GK., 2, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 2, 8, Novartis Pharma K.K., 2, 8, Asahikasei Pharma Corp., 2, 5, 8, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co., 2, 8, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., 2, 5, 8, Astellas Pharma Inc., 2, 8, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2, 8, Pfizer Japan Inc., 2, 8, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 2, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 2, Sanofi K.K., 2, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., 2, 8, Yutoku Pharmaceutical Ind. Co., Ltd., 2, UCB Japan Co., Ltd., 2, 5, Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 2, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., 2, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., 8, AbbVie GK, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 8; H. Umehara, None; N. Yasuda, KAN Research Institute, Inc., 3; F. Tago, Eisai Co., Ltd., 3; Y. Kitahara, Eisai Co., Ltd., 1, 3; M. Kawakubo, Eisai Co., Ltd., 1, 3; H. Hisaki, Eisai Co., Ltd., 3; S. Hojo, Eisai Co., Ltd., 3; T. Kawano, KAN Research Institute, Inc., 3; T. Imai, KAN Research Institute, Inc., 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Nanki T, Umehara H, Yasuda N, Tago F, Kitahara Y, Kawakubo M, Hisaki H, Hojo S, Kawano T, Imai T. A Phase 2 Study of E6011, an Anti-Fractalkine Monoclonal Antibody, ㏌ Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Responding to Biologics [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-study-of-e6011-an-anti-fractalkine-monoclonal-antibody-%e3%8f%8c-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-inadequately-responding-to-biologics/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-study-of-e6011-an-anti-fractalkine-monoclonal-antibody-%e3%8f%8c-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-inadequately-responding-to-biologics/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology