ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2835

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sirukumab in Patients with Active Lupus Nephritis

Cynthia Aranow1, R. van Vollenhoven2, Brad H. Rovin3, Carrie Wagner4, Bei Zhou4, Robert Gordon4 and Benjamin Hsu4, 1The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 2The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Division of Nephrology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 4Janssen Research & Development, LLC., Spring House, PA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: IL-6 and lupus nephritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Novel Therapies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is over-expressed in lupus nephritis(LN). This proof-of-concept study examined the efficacy and safety of sirukumab, an anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody, in patients (pts) with active, ISN/RPS class III or class IV lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods: Pts were enrolled if they had class III or IV LN on renal biopsy within 14 mo of randomization, persistent proteinuria (≥ 0.5 g/d) despite immunosuppression (MMF or AZA ± corticosteroids), and stable renin-angiotensin system blockade. Pts were randomized to IV sirukumab 10 mg/kg (n=21) or placebo (Pbo, n=4) q4wks through wk 24. Primary endpoint was % reduction from baseline in proteinuria (protein/creatinine (P/C) ratio in a 12hr urine collection) at wk 24; major secondary endpoints included the proportion of pts with: 1) ≥50% reduction of baseline proteinuria; 2) meaningful reduction in proteinuria; 3) no worsening of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on serum creatinine levels (defined as <15% decrease from baseline rate); all at any time through wk 24, as well as 4)% change from baseline in Patient’s and Physician’s Global Assessments of Disease Activity over time.

                                                                                             

Results: Median time from biopsy collection to randomization was 116 days. 76% of pts (19/25) completed 2-wks of treatment. No median reduction in proteinuria at wk 24 (primary endpoint) was observed in the sirukumab group.  In contrast, the Pbo group demonstrated median 43.3% increase in proteinuria(Table), largely driven by 1 Pbo-treated pt. Secondary endpoints indicated 20% (4/20) and 15% (3/20) of sirukumab-treated pts, vs 0% of Pbo-treated pts, demonstrated a ≥50% reduction or a meaningful reduction, respectively, in proteinuria at wk 24 (Table). In contrast, at wk 24, 10/18 (56%) of sirukumab-treated pts and 3/4 (75%) of Pbo-treated pts had no worsening in GFR (Table). Neither Physician nor Patient Global Assessment scores improved in either treatment group.  Among the 12 sirukumab-treated pts positive for anti-dsDNA at baseline, there was a mean 62.3% reduction in anti-dsDNA at wk 24. Among 6 pts who discontinued study agent, 5 did so because of an adverse event(AE)(anaphylactic reaction, increased liver enzymes, neutropenia, pneumonia, and LN worsening). No deaths occurred. Approximately half (47.5%, 10/21) of sirukumab-treated pts had ≥1 serious AE, the majority of which were infections. No serious AE occurred with Pbo-treated pts, although 4/37 (10.8%) screen-failed pts had 1 or more SAEs during the 8 wk screening period.

Conclusion: IL-6 inhibition with sirukumab in pts with active LN did not result in a median improvement in proteinuria, however approx 15-20% of treated pts did show a notable reduction in proteinuria.  A high frequency of serious AE was observed in this population of immunosuppressed pts with refractory LN.

Table.   Summary of primary and major secondary efficacy endpoints  at wk 24

Placebo

CNTO 136

Modified intent-to-treat pts

4

20 a

Proteinuria % change from baseline at wk24a

Median

(95% CI)

43.3

0.00

(-61.8, 39.6)

Pts with decrease ≥50% in proteinuria at  wk24a

0

4/20 (20.0%)

95% confidence interval

(5.7, 43.7)

Pts with meaningful reduction in proteinuria at wk24a,b

0

3/20 (15.0%)

95% confidence interval

(3.2, 37.9)

Pts with no worsening in GFR at wk24

3 (75.0%)

10/18 (55.6%)

95% confidence interval

(30.8, 78.5)

 aA last-observation-carried-forward procedure was used to impute missing proteinuria values if a pt had data for ≥1 post- baseline evaluation. Of 21 randomized pts, 20 were included in the efficacy analyses.

bMeaningful reduction in proteinuria was defined as P/C (protein/creatinine) ratio < 0.5 for non-nephrotic pts ; and ≥50% reduction in P/C ratio and P/C ratio < 3.0 for nephrotic pts.


Disclosure:

C. Aranow,
None;

R. van Vollenhoven,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

2;

B. H. Rovin,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Questcor,

2,

Centocor, Inc.,

5,

Lilly,

5,

GlaxoSmithKline,

5,

Medimmune,

5,

aurina,

5;

C. Wagner,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

3;

B. Zhou,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

3;

R. Gordon,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

3;

B. Hsu,

Janssen Research & Development, LLC.,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-multicenter-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-proof-of-concept-study-to-evaluate-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-sirukumab-in-patients-with-active-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology