ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0371

A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JBT-101/Lenabasum in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, an Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence Study (ALE09)

Meggan Mackay1, Robert Zurier2, Diane Kamen3, Fotios Koumpouras4, Anca Askanase5, Kenneth Kalunian6, Steffan Schulz7, Giovanni Franchin8, Nancy Olsen9, Andreea Coca10, Roberto Caricchio11, Maureen McMahon12, Maria Dall'Era13, Amit Saxena14, Megan Clowse15, Stanley Ballou16, Linna Ding17, Beverly Welch18, Jessica Springer19, Andrew Shaw1, Lynette Keyes-Elstein20, Kaitlyn Steinmiller21, Amanda Mickey21, Cynthia Aranow1 and Betty Diamond1, 1Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 2Feinstein Institutes, Wyckoff, NJ, 3Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 4Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 5Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 6University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 7Univ Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 8BronxCare, Feinstein Institutes, Manhasset, NY, 9Penn State University/Milton S Hershey, Hershey, PA, 10UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, 11Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 12University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 13University of California, Division of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, 14NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, 15Duke University, Durham, NC, 16Case Western Reserve University - Metro Health, Cleveland, OH, 17NIH NIAID, Rhockvile, MD, 18NIAID/NIH, Bethesda, MD, 19NIH/NIAID, Rockville, MD, 20Rho, Chapel Hill, NC, 21Rho Inc, Durham, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: clinical trial, Disease Activity, pain, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: SLE – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms are common in SLE, often associate with debilitating pain requiring immunosuppressive treatment. JBT-101 is a non-psychotropic, non-immunosuppressive, cannabinoid receptor 2 agonist that stimulates resolution of inflammation by increased production of specialized pro-resolving mediators and decreased production of inflammatory molecules. Our goal was to test efficacy and safety of JBT-101 for treatment of inflammatory MSK disease in SLE.

Methods: Adults (18-70 years) meeting SLE ACR criteria with active MSK symptoms (SLEDAI arthritis or BILAG 2004 mild/moderate arthritis), on stable SLE medications and prednisone ≤10 mg daily, with average maximum daily pain scores ≥ 4 on a 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS), were randomized to 12 weeks treatment with placebo (PBO), or 10mg (low), 20mg (med), or 40mg (high) daily of JBT-101. NRS scores were reported daily. Disease activity was assessed at Days 1, 29, 57, 84 and 113; these analyses are pending. The primary endpoint, improvement in NRS score from Days 1 to 84, was analyzed with a mixed effects regression model, that included the screening 7 day average pain NRS and Fibromyalgia Symptom Scale (FSS) scores as covariates to estimate longitudinal trends in NRS and change over time for each treatment group. NRS data up to last day of study treatment were included except days when narcotic analgesics were taken. A secondary endpoint, pain category, was defined using the average 7 day NRS prior to study visits: ≤ 1 no pain, ( >1- ≤3) mild, ( >3-≤7) moderate, >7 severe.

Results: The 101 randomized and treated subjects (Table 1) had a mean screening 7 day average pain NRS=6.6 and mean FSS score of 15.7. FSS scores ≥13 are consistent with a fibromyalgia diagnosis; 71.3% had FSS scores ≥13. The covariate-adjusted estimated change in NRS from Days 1 to 84 was not significantly different between groups: -0.3 PBO, -0.9 low, -1.5 med, -1.2 high (p=.419) (Fig 1). Pairwise-comparisons of active arms versus PBO were not significant (all p >.3, Bonferroni corrected). Among 84 subjects with NRS data at the end of the treatment period at Day 85, pain improved by at least 1 pain category from baseline for 3 (14%) PBO, 10 (45%) low dose, 8 (38%) med dose, and 9 (47%) high dose subjects (p=0.083 overall, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel C2; p=0.012 pooled active vs PBO, Pearson’s C2.).

No grade 4 or 5 adverse events (AEs) were observed (Table 2). 75 subjects experienced at least 1 grade 2 or 3 AE: 20 (80%) PBO, 19 (79%) low, 21 (78%) mod, 15 (60%) high. 5 subjects experienced treatment-related AEs resulting in study drug discontinuation: 1 (4%) med, 4 (16%) high, all were Grade 2. 6 subjects experienced serious AEs: 2 (8%) PBO, 3 (11%) med, 1 (4%) high; all unrelated to study drug. 2 subjects in each active arm experienced severe disease flares (excluding MSK domain), compared to 3 in PBO.

Conclusion: JBT-101 was safe and well-tolerated. While the pre-specified mixed effects model did not identify significant differences between changes in NRS pain scores in active arms vs. PBO, the frequency of pain category improvement at Day 84 was notably higher in the active arms vs PBO. Further analyses, including those of SLEDAI, BILAG and PGA, may identify patients most likely to respond to JBT-101. NCT03093402

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3

Figure 1. Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain over time. Daily NRS scores were analyzed with a mixed effects regression model, that included the screening 7-day average pain NRS and Fibromyalgia Symptom Scale (FSS) scores as covariates.


Disclosures: M. Mackay, None; R. Zurier, Corbus Pharmaceuticals; D. Kamen, None; F. Koumpouras, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), aurinia; A. Askanase, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Aurinia, Amgen, Pfizer, Idorsia, Eli Lilly, UCB, AbbVie/Abbott, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS); K. Kalunian, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, Equillium, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Roche, Lupus Research Alliance, Pfizer, Sanford Consortium, Viela, Nektar; S. Schulz, None; G. Franchin, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Sanofi, Pfizer; N. Olsen, None; A. Coca, None; R. Caricchio, None; M. McMahon, None; M. Dall'Era, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), AstraZeneca, Aurinia, BMS, Amgen; A. Saxena, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Kezar Life Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS); M. Clowse, Exagen; S. Ballou, None; L. Ding, None; B. Welch, None; J. Springer, None; A. Shaw, None; L. Keyes-Elstein, None; K. Steinmiller, None; A. Mickey, None; C. Aranow, None; B. Diamond, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mackay M, Zurier R, Kamen D, Koumpouras F, Askanase A, Kalunian K, Schulz S, Franchin G, Olsen N, Coca A, Caricchio R, McMahon M, Dall'Era M, Saxena A, Clowse M, Ballou S, Ding L, Welch B, Springer J, Shaw A, Keyes-Elstein L, Steinmiller K, Mickey A, Aranow C, Diamond B. A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JBT-101/Lenabasum in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, an Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence Study (ALE09) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-double-blind-randomized-placebo-controlled-multicenter-study-to-evaluate-efficacy-safety-and-tolerability-of-jbt-101-lenabasum-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-an-autoimmunity-centers-o/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-double-blind-randomized-placebo-controlled-multicenter-study-to-evaluate-efficacy-safety-and-tolerability-of-jbt-101-lenabasum-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-an-autoimmunity-centers-o/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology