ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1781

A Direct-to-Patient PsA Screening Survey for Earlier Identification of At-Risk Psoriasis Patients and Reduction of Physician Burden

Megan Meier1, Jessica Walsh2 and Shaobo Pei3, 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Salt Lake City Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VAMC)/University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Salt Lake City Veteran Affairs and University of Utah Medical Centers, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: psoriasis, Psoriatic arthritis, screening

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster IV: Clinical Aspects of PsA & Peripheral SpA (1773–1800)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Diagnostic delays are common with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and contribute to unnecessary impairments in quality of life and function. Screening surveys for identifying at-risk patients are infrequently used in busy clinical practices. The goal was to develop a direct-to-patient screening approach that does not burden providers with PsA screening tasks. Objective 1 was to characterize patterns of rheumatology referrals and PsA diagnoses in psoriasis patients randomized to receive a screening survey (intervention group) vs. not receive a survey (control group). Objective 2 was to characterize referral and diagnostic patterns in subgroups of intervention group patients instructed to either contact study staff for a rheumatology appointment (direct access [DA] group) or discuss a rheumatology referral with their doctor (standard of care [SOC] group), if they screened positively for elevated PsA risk.

Methods: Patients with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for psoriasis but not PsA in the electronic health record (EHR) were randomized to the control group vs. intervention groups (DA or SOC) (Figure 1). The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool Survey1 was disseminated electronically and via postal mail beginning 09/18/20 (index date). Referral and diagnostic outcomes were extracted from the EHR for preliminary analysis on 2/2/2021 and compared between DA, SOC, and control groups.

Results: The population included 3081 patients (Figure 1) with 51.5% females and a mean age of 50.1 years. 15.4% completed the online survey, of whom 29.3% screened positively. Among DA patients, 8.6% contacted study staff, of whom 32.5% screened positively, and 29.3% requested a rheumatology appointment. In EHR data, rheumatology appointments occurred with 1.4% DA, 0.7% SOC, and 0.1% control patients, and the mean times to a rheumatology appointment were 77.4, 60.6, and 133.0 days in DA, SOC, and control groups, respectively (Figure 2). PsA diagnosis occurred in 0.4% DA, 0.3% SOC, and 0 control patients, and mean times to PsA diagnosis were 66.0 days in DA and 77.0 days in SOC groups.

Conclusion: Rheumatologic evaluations and PsA diagnoses were more frequent and earlier in patients exposed to a screening survey than unexposed patients. Rates of rheumatologic evaluations and PsA diagnosis were low, but patient engagement may improve with future study cohorts (n≈24,000 patients), as the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic decline.

1Ibrahim GH, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009; 27:469-74.

Figure 1. Attrition

Figure 2. Referral and diagnostic patterns for PsA in patients with psoriasis


Disclosures: M. Meier, None; J. Walsh, AbbVie, 2, 5, Merck, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5; S. Pei, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Meier M, Walsh J, Pei S. A Direct-to-Patient PsA Screening Survey for Earlier Identification of At-Risk Psoriasis Patients and Reduction of Physician Burden [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-direct-to-patient-psa-screening-survey-for-earlier-identification-of-at-risk-psoriasis-patients-and-reduction-of-physician-burden/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-direct-to-patient-psa-screening-survey-for-earlier-identification-of-at-risk-psoriasis-patients-and-reduction-of-physician-burden/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology