ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1349

A Decision Support Tool to Improve Herpes Zoster Vaccination Rates Among Patients Starting Biologic Medications

Sara Schoenfeld1, Eli Miloslavsky1, Weihong Yang1, Naina Rastalsky1, Mollie Carruthers1, Zachary Wallace1, Traci Powers1, Marcy Bolster2 and Deborah Collier1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Quality improvement and vaccines

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Herpes zoster infection causes serious morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Vaccination reduces the risk of zoster infection by up to 40% among patients with autoimmune disease and is recommended for patients aged 60 or above before starting immunosuppressive treatment. We implemented an electronic medical record based zoster vaccine decision support tool to improve vaccination rates among patients prescribed but not yet started on biologic medications.

Methods

We incorporated a zoster vaccine screening tool into the mandatory prior authorization (PA) process required for prescribing biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) across a multicenter rheumatology practice at a tertiary care academic medical center. The revised electronic PA form included a zoster section with decision support prompts to screen each patient’s appropriateness for the vaccine and to facilitate referral for the vaccine.

Process and outcome measures were analyzed during a 9 month period. The process measure assessed whether physicians accurately completed the zoster section of the PA form. The outcome measure assessed whether patients actually received the zoster vaccine. As a comparison group we used zoster immunization data derived from chart reviews of 123 patients over age 60 prescribed biologic medications in the same rheumatology unit during the 12 month period before implementation of the zoster screening decision support tool.

Results

During the 9 month period following the intervention, 119 PA forms with the zoster section were filled out for patients starting a biologic medication. The form was filled out correctly in 114/119 cases (Figure 1a). Prior to implementation of the zoster section on the PA form, 86/123 patients over age 60 who were prescribed a biologic were eligible for the vaccine without a contraindication. Of these 86 patients, 25% received the vaccine (Figure 1b). After the intervention, 41 of 119 patients prescribed a biologic were age-appropriate for the zoster vaccine, of whom 29 had one of the pre-defined contraindications to receiving the vaccine. Of the 12 age-eligible patients without contraindications, 42% received the vaccine (Figure 1c).

Conclusion

Incorporating a zoster immunization decision support tool in an electronic PA form for biologic medications was a successful method of prompting physicians to screen patients requiring biologic DMARD therapy for the zoster vaccine. After the support tool was implemented, a greater percentage of age-appropriate patients without a contraindication received the vaccine. Vaccination rates could be further improved by addressing a number of barriers including cost and logistical vaccine administration hurdles as well as by considering zoster screening prior to initiating a nonbiologic DMARD or prednisone.

Figure 1 Zoster Screening Tool – Process and Outcome Measures

Figure 1 ACR abstract final jpeg.jpg


Disclosure:

S. Schoenfeld,
None;

E. Miloslavsky,
None;

W. Yang,
None;

N. Rastalsky,
None;

M. Carruthers,
None;

Z. Wallace,
None;

T. Powers,
None;

M. Bolster,

Johnson and Johnson,

1,

Eli Lilly and Company,

2,

ABIM Rheumatology Speciality Board, Chair,

6,

ABIM Rheumatology Test Writing Committee, Chair,

6,

ACR COTW, Chair,

6,

ACR Board of Directors,

6,

RRF Board of Directors,

6;

D. Collier,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-decision-support-tool-to-improve-herpes-zoster-vaccination-rates-among-patients-starting-biologic-medications/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology