ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2065

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Psychological Symptoms, Sleep Quality, and Functional Balance in Fibromyalgia

Vicky Chen1, William F. Harvey2, Jeffrey B. Driban2, Mei Chung3, Lori Lyn Price4 and Chenchen Wang2, 1Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 3Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 4Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: fibromyalgia, functions and psychological well-being

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Fibromyalgia, Soft Tissue Disorders, Regional and Specific Clinical Pain Syndromes: Research Focus

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Previous studies suggest that FM may be associated with worse balance and falls. Balance requires the coordination of motor, sensory (ex. visual and vestibular), and cognitive abilities.  These may be affected by the psychological symptoms present in FM. Depression, anxiety, and stress, have both cognitive (reduced attention) and somatic features (poor sleep quality and psychomotor slowing); and may therefore be related to the balance problems in FM. We intend to evaluate these relationships in this study.

Methods

We analyzed baseline data from a randomized trial comparing Tai Chi to aerobic exercise in individuals with FM. Balance was measured using a One-Leg Balance Test (OLBT): time standing on preferred leg with eyes closed; max time = 30 seconds. Psychological symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress were measured using validated scales: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II); Participant-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Emotional Distress rating of Anxiety; and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).  Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.  The mental component of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36 MCS) measured mental health related quality of life. Higher scores indicate better health status. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Higher scores reflect poor sleep quality. Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale (CPSS) measured confidence in ability to perform a particular behavior or task. Higher scores reflect improved status. We used a logistic regression model to detect associations between balance times ≤3.02 seconds (defined by first quartile) and measures of psychological symptoms, self-efficacy, mental health-related quality of life, and sleep quality. Independent variables were analyzed in tertiles. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, and BMI.

Results

234 screened participants were included in our analysis. 90% were female. Mean age was 51.3±11.8 years and mean BMI was 29.7±6.8 kg/m2. The median performance on OLBT was 4.7 seconds. Table 1 shows the odds ratios for OLBT ≤3.02 seconds and BDI-II, PSS, SF-36 Mental Component, PROMIS anxiety, PSQI, and CPSS. Better sleep quality and fewer depressive symptoms were weakly associated with improved balance, but no significant associations were found between balance and measures of psychological symptoms and sleep quality.

Conclusion

We were unable to demonstrate any significant associations between balance and psychological symptoms or sleep quality.  Small sample size may limit data interpretation and evaluation of the results.  We recommend that future studies assess factors more directly related to balance such as muscle strength, proprioception, and attention.  Such research is critical to understanding the mechanisms underlying balance problems in FM and may identify novel therapeutic targets for future longitudinal studies.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics and Odds Ratios: Adjusted for age, sex, and BMI.

Measure

(range)

Tertile (Minimum, Maximum)

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

One Leg Balance Test With Eyes Closed ≤3.02 seconds

P-Value

BDI-II

(0-63)

Lowest (0.0,14.0)

REFERENCE

Middle (15.0, 26.0)

1.23 (0.51, 2.99)

0.65

Highest (27.0, 61.0)

1.47 (0.59, 3.69)

0.41

PSS

(0-40)

Lowest (0.0, 16.0)

REFERENCE

Middle (17.0, 23.0)

1.03 (0.45, 2.36)

0.93

Highest (24.0, 40.0)

0.70 (0.27, 1.83)

0.47

SF-36 MCS*

(0-100)

Lowest (18.0, 33.8)

REFERENCE

Middle (33.9, 43.4)

1.25 (0.52, 3.02)

0.60

Highest (43.5, 66.8)

0.86 (0.35, 2.12)

0.75

PROMIS Anxiety 6a

(36.3-82.7)

Lowest (36.3, 56.3)

REFERENCE

Middle (57.6, 61.3)

0.65 (0.27, 1.50)

0.35

Highest (62.6, 82.7)

0.76 (0.32, 1.81)

0.54

PSQI

(0-21)

Lowest (1.0, 9.0)

REFERENCE

Middle (10.0, 14.0)

1.45 (0.59, 3.56)

0.41

Highest (15.0, 21.0)

1.45 (0.56, 3.75)

0.43

CPSS*

(0-10)

Lowest (1.0, 4.0)

1.13 (0.47, 2.71)

0.78

Middle (4.13, 6.0)

0.73 (0.73, 0.31)

0.48

Highest (6.1, 10.0)

REFERENCE

BDI-II=Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition; PSS=Perceived Stress Scale; SF-36 MCS=Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 Mental Component Summary; PROMIS=Participant-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; PSQI=Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory; CPSS=Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale

*Higher scores indicate better outcomes (for other measures, higher scores indicate greater symptom severity)


Disclosure:

V. Chen,
None;

W. F. Harvey,
None;

J. B. Driban,
None;

M. Chung,
None;

L. L. Price,
None;

C. Wang,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-cross-sectional-analysis-of-psychological-symptoms-sleep-quality-and-functional-balance-in-fibromyalgia/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology