ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2093

A Comparison Of Performance On The Keital Functional Test By Persons With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Sclerosis

Janet L. Poole, Amy New and Christina Garcia, Occupational Therapy Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: functional status, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: ARHP Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

Mobility is necessary for participation in all areas of daily life including self-care, work and leisure.  In rheumatic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic sclerosis (SSc), mobility can be compromised due to decreased joint motion, muscle weakness and pain in the lower extremities.  While the lower extremity impairments in RA have been studied, less attention has been paid to lower extremity involvement in persons with SSc. Therefore the purpose of the study is to compare lower extremity impairments in persons with RA, SSc and healthy controls.

Methods:

Fifty eight persons with RA, 64 persons with SSc and 30 healthy controls were evaluated with the Keital Functional Test (KFT), a performance based test of functional joint motion and strength that has been shown to be an important predictor of disability and mortality in people with RA.  Only the 15 items from the KFT that related to lower extremity function in an upright position were used.  There are specific ordinal scoring criteria for each item.  Scores for 11 items range from 0 (no limitation) to 2 (impossible).  Two items (rise from a chair and walk 30 minutes) range from 0 (no problem) to 6 (impossible) while two other items (going up and down stairs) are scored from 0 (7 seconds, no rail) to 5 (impossible).  Demographic information on age, disease duration, gender, employment status and health status was also collected. Analysis of variance compared the three groups on item scores and total scores on the KFT.

Results:

There were no significant differences between the 3 groups for any of the demographic variables except for perceived health status `(p = .001) and employment status (p = .001). Perceive health was significantly better in the HC group and significantly more HC were working full time compared to the RA and SSc groups. On the KFT, there were significant differences between the HC group and RA and SSc groups for 5 items and the total score: rising from a chair (p = .007), squatting (p = .001), walking 30 meters (p = 001), walking downstairs (p = 001), walking upstairs (p = 001), and the total score (p = 001).  There were no significant differences for 7 items:  standing on heels, standing on the right leg, standing on the left leg, placing right foot on chair for hip and knee flexion, placing left foot on chair, placing right heel on chair for hip flexion and knee extension, and placing left heel on chair. All 3 groups scored significantly different from each other for external rotation of the right hip (p = 001) in that the HC group has the highest external rotation and the SSc group had the least. For external rotation of the left hip, there was only a significant difference between the RA and HC group.

Conclusion:

The results show that persons with RA and SSc have greater lower extremity involvement than HC and suggest areas that could be targeted for intervention. The results also show that persons with SSc do have lower extremity impairments which have not been examined, other than walking speed and time, in other studies.


Disclosure:

J. L. Poole,
None;

A. New,
None;

C. Garcia,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-comparison-of-performance-on-the-keital-functional-test-by-persons-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-systemic-sclerosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology