ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 332

A Comparison of Electronic and Manual Fracture Risk Assessment Tools in Screening US Veterans at Risk for Osteoporosis

Tyler Williams1, Phillip Lawrence2, Jacob Crook3, Richard Nelson3, Joanne Lafleur4 and Grant W. Cannon5, 1Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah Department of Internal Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and Roseman University of Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, 3University of Utah Division of Epidemiology and Salt Lake City VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 4University of Utah Department of Pharmacotherapy and Salt Lake City VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 5Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: fracture risk and osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease – Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis - Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Osteoporosis-related fractures contribute to increased morbidity and mortality in those affected and substantial economic burden to society. Effective screening for osteoporosis with fracture risk assessment tools (FRATs) is crucial to allow for needed preventive therapies. Electronic medical records (EMRs) present an important opportunity to identify patients at high risk for osteoporosis-related fractures. We compared the performance of four FRATs in identifying patients with osteoporosis by bone mineral density (BMD) T-score: The Veterans Affairs Fracture Absolute Risk Assessment Tool (VA-FARA), The World Health Organization’s Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) based on patient-reported risk factors, the electronic FRAX (e-FRAX) which obtains inputs from the EMR, and the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Screening Tool (OST). VA-FARA, FRAX, and e-FRAX are designed to identify fracture risk, which correlates with osteoporosis. OST is designed to identify osteoporosis.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of all patients enrolled in the VA Salt Lake City Bone Health Team (BHT) from February 1, 2012 through February 1, 2013 who had a DXA. Patients were eligible for BHT intervention if they were males age 70+ or females age 65+. BMD scores were obtained by chart abstraction for each patient. Osteoporosis risk factors were obtained from a screening questionnaire which patients completed prior to DXA scan for calculation of FRAX. For VA-FARA and eFRAX risk factors were derived from the EMR. Clinical risk scores were then calculated and compared against the gold standard of DXA-based osteoporosis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for each test and areas under the curve (AUC) were compared.

Results: A cohort of 473 patients met eligibility criteria (mean age 80.3 years, 98% male). Of these, 118 patients (25%) had osteoporosis as defined by DXA score < -2.5. There was no statistically significant difference between FRATs in identifying DXA-based osteoporosis. ROC curves are shown in figure 1. ROC statistics are shown in Table 1.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that FRATs perform similarly in identifying osteoporosis defined by BMD T-score among elderly Veterans. Electronic osteoporosis screening methods have a significant ease-of-use advantage by passively collecting risk factor data from the EMR. If these tools perform similarly for fracture outcomes as well, they could replace manual FRAX and thus improve efficiency in identifying individuals who should be sent for DXA scan to screen for osteoporosis.


Disclosure: T. Williams, None; P. Lawrence, None; J. Crook, None; R. Nelson, None; J. Lafleur, None; G. W. Cannon, Amgen, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Williams T, Lawrence P, Crook J, Nelson R, Lafleur J, Cannon GW. A Comparison of Electronic and Manual Fracture Risk Assessment Tools in Screening US Veterans at Risk for Osteoporosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-comparison-of-electronic-and-manual-fracture-risk-assessment-tools-in-screening-us-veterans-at-risk-for-osteoporosis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-comparison-of-electronic-and-manual-fracture-risk-assessment-tools-in-screening-us-veterans-at-risk-for-osteoporosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology