ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2018

A Clinical Risk Prediction Model for Skin Thickness Progression in Early Diffuse Scleroderma

Robyn T. Domsic1, Mary Lucas2, Virginia D. Steen3 and Thomas A. Medsger Jr.4, 1Medicine - Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Scleroderma Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 3Rheumatology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 4Department of Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: risk assessment, skin fibrosis and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud's – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics II

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:   Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rapidly evolving field with multiple potential therapeutic agents under development and several active clinical trials focused on treating diffuse cutaneous SSc.   When weighing management decisions for therapy and considering clinical trial involvement, estimating the likelihood of skin thickness progression over the next year will be helpful. Objectives:  To derive a clinical risk prediction tool to predict skin thickness progression over one year.

Methods:   We used a US single-center cohort of prospectively followed early diffuse SSc patients seen for an initial visit from Jan. 1, 1980 to Dec. 31, 2014.   To reflect current early diffuse SSc clinical trial design, early was defined as <3 years after the first non-Raynaud symptoms and diffuse skin as proximal to the elbows or knees.   Eligible patients had ≥ 2 modified Rodnan skin scores (mRSS) within one year of the first SSc center visit, for ≥ 3 mRSS over one year.  The outcome was mRSS progression at any time over one year of follow-up, defined as an increase of ≥5 points and a 25% increase in the mRSS from baseline.   SSc autoantibodies were confirmed by the gold standard methods of immunodiffusion or immunoprecipitation.  Skin change was assessed in multiple ways, including Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis  to determine a risk cut-off point for mRSS.  Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used.  Beta-estimates were rounded to the nearest 0.5, summed and ROC analysis performed.

Results:   Among 317 eligible patients the mean age was 50.8 ± 13.5 years, 74% female and 92% Caucasian.  The median disease duration from first SSc symptom was 0.90 years (IQR 0.63, 1.46).  The mean first visit mRSS was 23±11.  25% (n=79) were scl-70 positive, 56% (n=178) RNA-polymerase III positive (RNAP) positive, 54 (17%) other SSc-associated antibody and 2% (n=6) missing.    In total, 163 patients (51%) developed skin progression over one year.  The mean time to peak mRSS among progressors was 0.51±0.23 years from the first visit.   ROC analysis showed mRSS ≤27 to best predict skin progression.  A 4-variable model was developed to predict skin progression over one year (Table 1) with a AUC = 0.81 (95% CI 0.75, 0.88).  When β-estimates were rounded and summed as in Table 1, a 3-level risk stratification model was created with rate of skin progression depicted in Table 2.   The AUC for this model remained excellent at 0.80 (0.75, 0.85). 

Conclusion:    We have derived an accurate 3-level clinical risk stratification tool for skin thickness progression over one year of follow-up in early diffuse SSc patients.

Table 1: Multivariable Logistic Regression Model
 

β

Odds Ratio

(95% Confidence Interval)

p-value

Points Assigned

Disease duration< 1 year

 1.33

3.79 (1.74, 8.23)

0.0008

 1.5

Pulmonary fibrosis on chest  imaging

-1.35

0.26 (0.11, 0.62)

0.002

-1.5

SSc antibody

RNAP

Scl-70

Other SSc antibody

-1.53

 

0.22 (0.08, 0.60)

 

0.003

 

0

0

-1.5

Baseline mRSS ≤27

 2.39

10.96 (4.31. 27.84)

<0.0001

 2.5

 

 

 

 

Sum Score

 

Table 2: 3-level risk stratification tool for predicting skin progression
 

Sum Score

% of diffuse SSc patients with skin thickness progression

Low risk

-0.5 and below

10%

Moderate risk

0 to 1.5

28%

High risk

2.5 and above

72%

AUC = 0.80 (0.64, 0.73)

 


Disclosure: R. T. Domsic, Bayer Healthcare, 2,Biogen-Idec, 2; M. Lucas, None; V. D. Steen, None; T. A. Medsger Jr., None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Domsic RT, Lucas M, Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr.. A Clinical Risk Prediction Model for Skin Thickness Progression in Early Diffuse Scleroderma [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-clinical-risk-prediction-model-for-skin-thickness-progression-in-early-diffuse-scleroderma/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-clinical-risk-prediction-model-for-skin-thickness-progression-in-early-diffuse-scleroderma/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology