ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1420

6-Month Change in Pain and Function By Pre-Surgery Pain and Function Among Patients Selected for Total Knee Replacement in the United States

Uyen Sa D.T. Nguyen1, David Ayers2, Wenjun Li3, Leslie Harrold4 and Patricia D. Franklin5, 1Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 2Orthopedics & Physical Rehab, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 3Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 4Department of Orthopedics and Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 5Orthopedics & Physical Rehab, Univ of MA Med Schl, Worcester, MA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: functional status, pain and total joint replacement, Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In the US, the annual rate of TKRs in people 65 years or older increased almost 9-fold between 1979 and 2006, with similar if not greater growth in younger age groups. There is increasing debate regarding the appropriate utilization of TKRs. We examined change in pain and function, quality of life (QOL), and patient satisfaction at 6-month post-surgery stratified by their pre-surgery pain and function status.

Methods: We used data from the Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in TJR (FORCE-TJR), a national cohort of TJR patients of more than 150 surgeons in 22 sites nationwide. Participants had: primary, unilateral TKRs indicated by osteoarthritis; surgeries between April 2011 and May 2014; completed pre-operative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) including QOL items and Short-Form 36-item (SF-36) functional health survey; and the respective 6-month post-operative surveys, with satisfaction measured by Self Evaluated Transitions items. We classified patients as having high or low pain (KOOS Pain<70 vs. ≥70), and low or high physical function (SF-36 PCS <40 vs. ≥40) and grouped then as follows: 1) Low pain-High function (LP-HF), 2) Low pain-Low function (LP-LF), 3) High pain-High function (HP-HF), and 4) High pain-Low function (HP-LF). Change from baseline to 1-year post-surgery pain and function scores were calculated. Cohen’s unadjusted standardized differences in absolute post-op scores accounting for pooled SD were calculated with LP-HF as referent group.

Results: This study included 4,563 participants: 5% pre-op LP-HF, 20% either HP or LF, and 75% both HP-LF. By 6-month post-op (Table), in Group 1, 85% remained the same but 4% became much worse among people with pre-op LP-HF: in Group 4, 18% remained the same and 52% achieved much improvement among people with pre-op HP-LF. Mean change (SD) in 6-month KOOS pain score in LP-HF group was 8.3 (14.6) compared with 37.2 (19.7) in the HP-LF group. Patients in LP-HF had the near highest absolute mean (SD) post-op pain score (88.9 (13.0)) and the HP-LF group the lowest (79.9 (17.3)); the unadjusted standardized effect size was 0.59. Similarly, the mean change in PCS function was 2.6 (7.8) in the LP-HF group, and was 11.9 (9.0) in the HP-LF group. The LP-HF group had the highest absolute mean 6-month post-surgery function of 50.0 (7.4) while the HP-LF group had the lowest score of 42.0 (9.5); the unadjusted standardized effect size was 0.94. The groups reported similar satisfaction, but QOL items indicated better QOL among the pre-surgery LP-HF than the HP-LF groups.

Conclusion: While TKR patients with low pain and high function pre-op achieved the smallest mean change in pain and function, they reported better absolute outcomes at 6-months. The majority of TKR patients with high pain and poor function achieved the greatest mean improvement in pain and function.

Table. 6 Month-Change in Pain and Function by Pre-Operative Pain and Function Status

Characteristics

Group 1

Low Pain

High Function

n=234 (5%)

Group 2

Low Pain

Low Function

n=173 (4%)

Group 3

High Pain

High Function

n=718 (16%)

Group 4

High Pain

Low Function

n=3288 (75%)

Pain & Function Status 6-mth Post-KR

Remained in Same Classification Group

85%

25%

11%

18%

Optimal Improvement ->

(to Low Pain-High Function Group)

NA

65%

79%

52%

Worst Decline->

(to High Pain-Low Function Group)

4%

6%

7%

NA

Other Changes

9%

4%

3%

30%

6-month Change in Pain & Symptoms

Pain, KOOS Mean (SD) – Pre

80.7 (7.9)

79.5 (7.6)

53.7 (11.0)

42.7 (11.6)

Pain, KOOS Mean (SD) – Post

88.9 (13.0)

89.6 (11.3)

84.2 (14.8)

79.9 (17.3)

Unadjusted 6-mth Change Mean (SD)

8.3 (14.6)

10.2 (12.9)

30.5 (16.6)

37.2 (19.7)

Unadjusted Standardized Differences

relative to Pooled SD**

REF

0.06

0.34

0.59

6-month Change in Function

Function, SF36 PCS, Mean (SD)- Pre

47.4 (4.7)

34.0 (4.4)

44.5 (3.6)

30.1 (6.0)

Function, SF36 PCS, Mean (SD)- Post

50.0 (7.4)

44.1 (8.5)

49.3 (7.0)

42.0 (9.5)

Change over 6 months Mean (SD)

2.6 (7.8)

10.2 (7.8)

4.8 (7.0)

11.9 (9.0)

Unadjusted Standardized Differences

relative to Pooled SD**

REF

0.74

0.10

0.94

6-mth Post-TKR Satisfaction using Self-Evaluated Transitions

Better Health compared to 1 year ago-

60%

54%

61%

63%

More Capable everyday physical activity

79%

80%

82%

82%

More able to accomplish daily work

78%

78%

77%

78%

Less often bothered by emotional problem

47%

43%

47%

52%

Better Health compared to before surgery

61%

57%

63%

64%

Pre- and Post-TKR QoL Issues

Awareness Knee Problem

Daily/Constantly-Pre*

86%

92%

98%

99%

Daily/Constantly-Post

46%

52%

54%

62%

General Difficulty with Knee

NONE-Pre*

5.9%

4.0%

0.7%

0.2%

NONE-Post

50%

38%

35%

26%

* For Descriptive Purposes Only

**Cohen’s d http://www.uccs.edu/~lbecker/: effect size: 0.2-small, 0.5-medium, 0.8-large


Disclosure: U. S. D. T. Nguyen, None; D. Ayers, None; W. Li, None; L. Harrold, Corrona, LLC, 3; P. D. Franklin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nguyen USDT, Ayers D, Li W, Harrold L, Franklin PD. 6-Month Change in Pain and Function By Pre-Surgery Pain and Function Among Patients Selected for Total Knee Replacement in the United States [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/6-month-change-in-pain-and-function-by-pre-surgery-pain-and-function-among-patients-selected-for-total-knee-replacement-in-the-united-states/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/6-month-change-in-pain-and-function-by-pre-surgery-pain-and-function-among-patients-selected-for-total-knee-replacement-in-the-united-states/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology