ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1460

10 Years Of Treat-To-Target Therapy In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (the BeSt study): Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

I.M. Markusse1, G. Akdemir1, M. van den Broek1, L. Dirven1, R.J. Goekoop2, K.H. Han3, M. van Oosterhout4, P.J.S.M. Kerstens5, W.F. Lems6, T.W.J. Huizinga1 and C.F. Allaart1, 1Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands, 3Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 4Rheumatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands, 5Rheumatology, Jan van Breemen Research Institute | Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 6Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, radiology, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Long term studies with treat-to-target therapy are essential to guide treatment strategies. We report on a study that compared clinical and radiological outcomes of four treatment strategies  in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after ten years of treat-to-target therapy.

Methods: The BeSt (Dutch acronym for Treatment Strategies) study enrolled 508 patients with recent onset RA. Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment strategies:  1 sequential monotherapy, 2 step-up therapy, 3 initial combination therapy with prednisone, 4 initial combination therapy with infliximab. Treatment adjustments were made based on 3-monthly disease activity scores (DAS) measurements (DAS > 2.4: next treatment step; DAS ≤ 2.4 for ≥ 6 months: taper to maintenance dose, next if DAS < 1.6 for ≥ 6 months: stop last Disease-Modifying AntiRheumatic Drug). Functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire, HAQ)  was analyzed with a linear mixed model (LMM) with time, treatment and time x treatment as independent variables. Annual radiographs were scored in one session by two independent and blinded readers (IM and GA) using the Sharp van der Heijde Score (SHS).

Results: Baseline characteristics in all groups were comparable (over all groups mean DAS 4.4, mean HAQ 1.4). 200 of 508 (39%) have dropped out of the study. Of them, 6 returned for the final visit. Thus, in total 314 patients (62%) completed 10 years follow-up.

Mean age of completers was 61 years and 68% were female. Mean (SD) DAS was 1.6 (0.8) and mean HAQ (SD) was 0.6 (0.6), comparable among the groups. 82% had a DAS ≤ 2.4, 53% had a DAS < 1.6 (DAS-remission), 15% were in drug free remission (DFR) with a mean (median) duration of 52 (58) months. After 10 years, 39% were still on the initial treatment step.  Toxicity was similar in all groups. In table 1, outcomes per treatment strategy are shown.

Across groups, the initial functional improvement is maintained after 10 years of follow-up. Over time patients in group 4 have a significantly lower HAQ than patients in group 2 (0.52 versus 0.70, p= 0.03, other comparisons between groups non-significant).

After 10 years follow up there was no longer a significant difference in radiographic damage progression between groups,  and progression was low in all groups. In patients with longstanding DFR mean SHS progression was 0.21 (median (IQR) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)) per person year. Patients in longstanding DAS-remission (defined as mean DAS < 1.6 during year 5 to 10) had a mean SHS progression of  0.56 per year (median (IQR) 0.0 (0.0, 2.0)).

 

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

 

 

n=126

n=121

n=133

n=128

p-value

Clinical Outcomes

DAS, mean ± SD *

1.7 ± 0.7

1.7 ± 0.8

1.5 ± 0.8

1.6 ± 0.8

0.333

HAQ, mean ± SD *

0.6 ± 0.6

0.7 ± 0.6

0.5 ± 0.5

0.6 ± 0.6

0.121

DAS ≤ 2.44, n (%) *

61 (85)

43 (71)

59 (84)

75 (84)

0.102

DAS < 1.6, n (%) *

36 (50)

28 (46)

40 (57)

50 (56)

0.507

Drug free remission, n (%) *

11 (14)

11 (15)

12 (15)

13 (13)

0.604

Still on initial treatment step, n (%) *

21 (28)

13 (19)

33 (43)

52 (59)

< 0.001˟

Current use of infliximab, n (%) *

14 (18)

7 (10)

9 (12)

22 (24)

0.080

Drop out, n (%)

50 (40)

53 (44)

55 (41)

36 (28)

0.163

SAE, total n

124

97

126

126

0.665

Patients with SAE, n (%)

60 (48)

50 (41)

61 (46)

63 (49)

0.630

SHS progression

 

 

 

 

 

Year 0-10, median (IQR)*

2.0 (0.0 – 11.0)

2.5 (0.0 – 13.5)

3.0 (0.3 – 11.3)

1.5 (0.0 – 6.0)

0.390

Patients with ΔSHS > 5, n (%)*

24 (38)

23 (42)

27 (42)

21 (27)

0.190

Patients with ΔSHS > 10, n (%)*

16 (25)

16 (29)

18 (28)

12 (15)

0.196

* Completers analysis; ˟ Group 1 and 2 vs 4: p < 0.001, group 3 vs group 4 p < 0.05, group 2 vs group 3 p < 0.05

Conclusion: Ten years follow up in the BeSt study shows the benefit of continued  treat-to-target therapy, steering at low disease activity. Of 508 patients, 62% completed follow up. After initial improvement no decline in function occurred.  53% of completers were in DAS remission, and 15% in prolonged drug free remission. Radiologic damage progression was low and no longer different between groups.


Disclosure:

I. M. Markusse,
None;

G. Akdemir,
None;

M. van den Broek,
None;

L. Dirven,
None;

R. J. Goekoop,
None;

K. H. Han,
None;

M. van Oosterhout,
None;

P. J. S. M. Kerstens,
None;

W. F. Lems,

W. F. Lems received speakers fee from roche, abbott, pfizer, merck,

5;

T. W. J. Huizinga,

TWJ Huizinga has received lecture fees/consultancy fees from Merck, UCB, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biotest AG, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Abbott, Crescendo Bioscience, Nycomed, Boeringher, Takeda, and Eli Lilly,

5;

C. F. Allaart,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/10-years-of-treat-to-target-therapy-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-the-best-study-clinical-and-radiological-outcomes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology