ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 54

Concordance with the National Osteoporosis Foundation Treatment Guidelines After DXA Result Notification

Nicole Wright1, Xin Lu2, Stephanie Edmonds2, Fredric Wolinsky2, Douglas Roblin3, Peter Cram4,5 and Kenneth G. Saag6, 1Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 3Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, GA, 4University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 5University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Immunology & Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Guidelines and osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health: Osteoporosis, Non-Inflammatory Arthritis and More

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) published treatment guidelines to help guide clinicians on which patients should be considered for osteoporosis (OP) therapy. We examined patient factors associated with non-concordance among older adults participating in the PAADRN study.       

 

Methods: The PAADRN study (NCT01507662) is a large, NIH funded, randomized trial currently being conducted in the Iowa City, IA, Birmingham, AL, and Atlanta, GA metro areas. Immediately following DXA, participants ≥50 years of age are recruited and randomized. We used data from the control arm, usual care group, (n=2,711 as of 6/14/14) for our analyses. We defined guideline concordant OP therapy as the report of any FDA approved OP therapy at the 12-week post-DXA survey along with one of the following criteria: 1) baseline self-report of fracture after the age of 40, 2) T-score at or below the OP threshold (<-2.5), or 3) T-score within the low bone mass range (-1.5 to -2.5) and a FRAX score ≥20%. Non-concordance was examined among participants who 1) were indicated for OP therapy who did not report OP therapy at 12 weeks (N=1,170), and 2) were not indicated for OP therapy who reported OP therapy at 12 weeks (N=1,541). We used logistic regression to assess the association of baseline demographic and comorbidity factors with non-concordance in both groups.   

 

Results: Our study population was 85% female, 20% from minority backgrounds, and 60% ≥ 65 years of age. At baseline, 760 (28%) reported having a fracture after 40 years of age, 576 (21%) had DXA defined OP, and 188 (7%) had low bone mass with a FRAX ≥ 20%. At the 12-week survey, 38% of patients with indications for OP therapy reported medication use, and 15% of patients without indications for OP therapy reported medication use. When treatment was indicated, we found that being Black was associated with higher odds of treatment non-concordance in the crude analyses (Table). Factors associated with higher odds of non-concordance among those not indicated for treatment included: being a woman, Hispanic, having comorbidities related to secondary OP, being a pre-menopausal woman, the self-report of low bone mass and OP, calcium and multi-vitamin supplementation use, and having spoken to provider by 12-week survey (Table).

 

Conclusion: In this study of usual OP treatment, 38% of those indicated for OP treatment reported medication use, and 15% of those not indicated for treatment reported medication use. We found that race was associated with non-concordance when treatment was indicated. When treatment was not indicated, non-concordance was associated with conditions related to low BMD, potentially being used as preventative therapy. However, demographic and lifestyle factors were also associated with high non-concordance in this group, suggesting that additional education on the benefits and risks of OP therapies for both patients and providers is needed.

 

Table. Factors Associated with Non-Concordant Use of Osteoporosis Medications

Treatment Indicated but Not Received (n=723 / 1,170)

No Treatment Indicated

But Received (n=237 / 1,541)

 

OR*

95% CI

p-value

OR*

95% CI

p-value

Women vs. Men

0.75

(0.52, 1.08)

0.117

4.13

(2.32, 7.34)

<0.001

Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic

0.79

(0.29, 2.14)

0.646

2.39

(1.17, 4.91)

0.017

Black vs. White

1.71

(1.14, 2.56)

0.009

0.40

(0.27, 0.60)

<0.001

Site A vs. Site C

0.74

(0.55, 0.99)

0.044

1.39

(0.98, 1.95)

0.062

Site B vs. Site C

1.32

(0.95, 1.83)

0.099

0.55

(0.38, 0.81)

0.003

Self-report of LBM

0.45

(0.35, 0.57)

<0.001

3.35

(2.50, 4.48)

<0.001

Self-report of Osteoporosis

0.33

(0.26, 0.43)

<0.001

2.61

(1.82, 3.74)

<0.001

Pre-menopausal

0.67

(0.51, 0.89)

0.006

1.43

(1.02, 2.00)

0.038

Secondary Osteoporosis

0.74

(0.57, 0.96)

0.022

1.59

(1.17, 2.17)

0.003

Calcium Supplementation

0.53

(0.41, 0.69)

<0.001

3.07

(2.24, 4.19)

<0.001

Vitamin D Supplementation

0.52

(0.39, 0.69)

<0.001

3.02

(2.10, 4.34)

<0.001

DXA defined Low vs. Normal BMD

0.23

(0.12, 0.47)

<0.001

2.34

(1.69, 3.25)

<0.001

Spoke to Doctor by 12 week survey

0.58

(0.45, 0.73)

<0.001

1.81

(1.36, 2.41)

<0.001

*Crude associations from logistic regression models

DXA – dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, LBM – low bone mass

 


Disclosure:

N. Wright,
None;

X. Lu,
None;

S. Edmonds,
None;

F. Wolinsky,
None;

D. Roblin,
None;

P. Cram,
None;

K. G. Saag,

Amgen,

2,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Takeda,

2,

Ardea,

2,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

5,

AbbVie,

5,

Amgen,

5,

Ardea,

5,

BioCryst,

5,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

5,

Eli Lilly and Company,

5,

Crescendo,

5,

Iroko,

5,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

NOV VP Board of Trustees,

6,

ACR Board of Directors,

6.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/concordance-with-the-national-osteoporosis-foundation-treatment-guidelines-after-dxa-result-notification/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology