ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 265

Prevalence of Medicinal Marijuana Use Among 1000 Rheumatology Patients Attending a Community-Based Rheumatology Clinic: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

Peter A. Ste-Marie1, Yoram Shir1, Emmanouil Rampakakis2, John S. Sampalis2,3, Martin Cohen4, Michael Starr5, Mark A Ware1 and Mary-Ann Fitzcharles6, 1Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2JSS Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Rheumatology, Mcgill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5Rheumatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Rheumatology and Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical practice, marijuana and rheumatic disease

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Pain: Basic and Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  With a worldwide groundswell of interest in cannabinoids as a possible treatment option for persons with rheumatic diseases, and with few pharmacologic cannabinoid options available, patients may be using marijuana mostly to self-medicate.  “Severe arthritis” was cited as the diagnosis for 65% of persons legally authorized to possess medicinal marijuana in Canada in 2014. With knowledge that most medicinal marijuana is obtained illegally, and by extrapolating from Canadian census data of 2011, conservative estimates are that 4% of persons with rheumatic complaints may be using cannabis, with an even higher rate expected for those in rheumatology care. As there is currently no knowledge of the prevalence of use of marijuana in a defined rheumatology population, we have prospectively examined the use of herbal cannabis for 1000 rheumatology attenders.

Methods:  The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Review board and informed consent was obtained from every participant. During a two month period (April-May 2014), consecutive patients attending an academic, community based rheumatology clinic staffed by 3 rheumatologists were invited to participate. Patients were either newly referred or attending for a follow up visit.  The study comprised 2 questionnaires completed at the time of the visit: 1) demographic and disease related information completed by the rheumatologist, 2) patient anonymous report of current health status, pain severity and past or current marijuana use for either recreational or medicinal purposes, or both.

Results: Of the 1067 patients attending, 1000 (96%; 74% females; mean age 63 ± 15 yrs) agreed to participate. Thirty seven patients refused to participate and 30 were not eligible. Disease categories were as follows: inflammatory arthritis 516 (52%), osteoarthritis or back pain, 489(49%) soft tissue rheumatism or fibromyalgia, 218 (22%), and other condition, 99(10%) with some overlap of diagnoses. Medicinal marijuana was reportedly used by 28 patients (2.8%; 95% CI: 1.9-4.2). Users vs. non users were more likely to be younger, 53.vs.63 yrs (p=0.0003), unemployed or disabled 46% vs. 8% (p<0.0001), and with a trend to be male. Diagnoses did not differ between the users and nonusers, but users reported poorer global well-being 5.5 vs. 3.9 (p=0.0029), more pain 6.3 vs 4.8 (p= 0.0088), and previous recreational cannabis use 82% vs 19% (p< 0.0001). The Physician global assessment of health status did not differ significantly between the groups 3.2 vs 2.8 (p=0.2991). 

Conclusion:  Contrary to the expected rate, only 2.8% of patients, receiving rheumatology care for multiple rheumatic disease categories, reported current use of medicinal marijuana. With use observed across all disease categories, familiarity with marijuana as a recreational product may explain use for some. Perceived health status was poorer for users, with almost half not working.


Disclosure:

P. A. Ste-Marie,
None;

Y. Shir,
None;

E. Rampakakis,
None;

J. S. Sampalis,
None;

M. Cohen,
None;

M. Starr,
None;

M. A. Ware,
None;

M. A. Fitzcharles,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-medicinal-marijuana-use-among-1000-rheumatology-patients-attending-a-community-based-rheumatology-clinic-a-prospective-cross-sectional-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology