ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 467

Evaluation of the Rabbit Risk Score for Serious Infections in a UK Anti-TNF Treatment Cohort

Lucia Silva-Fernandez1,2, Mark Lunt1, Kath D. Watson1, . BSRBR Control Centre Consortium1, Deborah P. Symmons1, Kimme Hyrich1 and . On behalf of the BSRBR3, 1Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, Spain, 3British Society for Rheumatology, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, infection and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Safety of Biologics and Small Molecules in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Serious infections (SI) are a major concern in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). The RABBIT Risk Score (RRS) (1) allows a calculation of the expected number of SI over a one year period of TNFi treatment according to patient characteristics. This score was developed in a cohort of German patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) enrolled in the RABBIT biologics register and then validated in a second cohort from the same register. The aim of the present study is to assess the reliability of the RRS in two cohorts of patients with RA treated with TNFi from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR)-RA.

Methods: The BSRBR-RA is an ongoing national prospective cohort study of subjects with RA starting biologic therapy. Patients were recruited to a first TNFi cohort (old) between 2001 and 2008 and to a second TNFi cohort (new) from 2010 to date. Risk factors included in the RRS include age, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, chronic lung disease, chronic renal disease, previous serious infection, number of treatment failures, mean daily glucocorticoid dose and treatment with TNFi. As the BSRBR-RA does not capture the dose of oral steroids or intramuscular injections (common in the UK), we applied a modified version of the score to both cohorts assuming that all patients receiving steroids would take between 7.5-14 mg of prednisolone per day. We calculated the expected number of patients with at least one SI in the first year of therapy and compared to the observed numbers in each cohort. To evaluate the predictive performance of the RRS we calculated the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: 13,121 patients were recruited to the old cohort and 1,475 patients were recruited to the new cohort. There were significant differences between cohorts (Table). Patients from the old cohort had a longer disease duration, higher DAS28 and HAQ score, and more likely to be receiving steroids compared to newer patients. The crude incidence rate of SI was lower in the new cohort (29.3 new vs 62.3 old/1000 patient-years) as was the expected and observed number of patients with ≥1 SI during the first year of therapy. The predictive performance of the RRS was better for the new cohort (AUC=0.82) than for the old cohort (AUC=0.62).

Old cohort (n=13,121) New cohort (n=1,475) p
Age (years), mean (SD) 56.1 (12.3) 56.5 (12.6) 0.128
Gender: n (%) female 10,010 (76.3) 1,116 (75.7) 0.591
RA disease duration (years), Median (IQR) 11 (6 – 19) 6 (2 – 14) 0.0001
DAS28, mean (SD) 6.5 (1.0) 5.9 (1.0) 0.0001
HAQ score, mean (SD) 2.0 (0.6) 1.6 (0.7) 0.0001
RF +, n (%) 8,493 (64.8) 821 (55.6) <0.0001
Steroid use (%) 5,867 (44.7) 358 (24.3) <0.0001
Smoking 0.065
          Current, n (%) 2,861 (22.0) 279 (20.2)
          Ex-smoker, n (%) 4,922 (37.8) 505 (36.5)
          Never smoked, n (%) 5,238 (40.2) 600 (43.4)
More than 5 previous DMARDs, n (%) 325 (2.5) 4 (0.3) <0.0001
Diabetes, n (%) 750 (5.8) 115 (7.9) 0.001
Chronic lung disease, n (%) 2,060 (15.9) 252 (18.5) 0.012
Chronic renal disease, n (%) 330 (2.5) 28 (1.9) 0.149
Crude incidence rate of serious infections in the first year per 1,000 patient-years (95% Confidece Interval) 63.3 (59.0 – 67.9) 29.3 (20.8 – 41.3)
Number of observed first serious infections in the first year 771 33
Number of expected first serious infections in the first year 496 27
Area under the curve (95% Confidence Interval) 0.62 (0.60 – 0.64) 0.82 (0.73 – 0.91)

Conclusion: TNFi are being used earlier in RA patients with lesser disease activity, steroid use and  disability. These patients are also experiencing lower SI rates. Among these cohorts of UK patients, the RRS underestimated the total number of SI, although some misclassification of steroid dose and differential access to TNFi resulting in other unmeasured patient differences may have contributed.  The predictive power improved in a more recent cohort which strengthens the utility of this score in current routine clinical practice.

Reference: (1) Zink A et al. Evaluation of the RABBIT risk score for serious infections. Ann Rheum Dis 2013 Jun 28 (doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203341)


Disclosure:

L. Silva-Fernandez,
None;

M. Lunt,
None;

K. D. Watson,
None;

BSRBR Control Centre Consortium,
None;

D. P. Symmons,
None;

K. Hyrich,

Pfizer, Abbvie,

8;

On behalf of the BSRBR,

Pfizer Inc, Abbvie, UCB, Merck, Roche,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-rabbit-risk-score-for-serious-infections-in-a-uk-anti-tnf-treatment-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology