ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 495

Discontinuation of Biologics in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis after Achieving Low-Activity Disease Status

Moeko Ochiai1, Eri Sato1, Eiichi Tanaka1, Eisuke Inoue1, Ayako Nakajima1, Shigeki Momohara2, Atsuo Taniguchi2 and Hisashi Yamanaka2, 1Rheumatology, Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan, 2Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, remission and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Safety of Biologics and Small Molecules in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Several clinical trials have reported bio-free remission or discontinuation of biologic DMARDs; however, these findings have not been confirmed in a real-world setting. The aim of this study is to evaluate the discontinuation of biologics after achieving low -activity disease status among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing treatment in daily practice.

Methods: Among 1,775 patients (infliximab [IFX], 418 patients; etanercept [ETN], 690 patients; adalimumab [ADA], 267 patients; tocilizumab [TCZ], 318 patients; and abatacept [ABT], 82 patients) who had been treated with biologics in our clinic between 2003 and 2012, we extracted data on 43 patients with RA (IFX, 26 patients; ETN, 9 patients; ADA, 4 patients; TCZ, 2 patients; and ABT, 2 patients) who discontinued biologics since their disease activity were well controlled. In these patients, DAS28 scores were < 3.2 at the time of biologics discontinuation. Those 43 patients were divided into two groups (bio-free or bio-reuse) on the basis of biologic usage 1 year after discontinuation. Those 43 patients were also divided into bio-free success and bio-free failure groups on the basis of disease activity (DAS28 < 3.2 or DAS28 ≧ 3.2, respectively) 1 year after discontinuation. The clinical features of the patients at the time of initiation and discontinuation of biologics were compared between the bio-free and bio-reuse groups and between the bio-free success and bio-free failure groups. 

Results: The percentages of patients who discontinued biologics due to well-controlled disease activity and in the bio-free success group among biologics users in our clinic were 2.4% (43/1775) and 1.4% (25/1775), respectively. The number of patients in the bio-free and bio-reuse groups was 34/43 (79.1% [IFX, n = 20; ETN, n = 8; ADA, n = 3; TCZ, n = 1; and ABT, n = 2) and 9/43 (20.9%), respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to age (bio-free vs. bio-reuse [47.5 vs. 39.0 years]), disease duration (3.0 vs. 2.0 years), DAS28 (4.17 vs. 5.10), J-HAQ (0.75 vs. 0.56), dose of MTX (8.0 vs. 8.0 mg/week), and dose of glucocorticoids (4.0 vs. 0 mg/day) at initiation of biologics, or DAS28 at discontinuation of biologics (2.09 vs. 1.80), or duration of biologics use (591.5 vs. 851.0 days). In addition, most clinical features did not differ significantly between the bio-free success (n=25 [58.1%]; IFX, n = 13; ETN, n = 6; ADA, n = 3; TCZ, n = 1; and ABT, n = 2) and bio-free failure groups (n=18 [41.9%]). The median DAS28 at initiation of biologics was significantly lower in the bio-free success group than the bio-free failure group (3.95 vs. 5.04, p=0.04). The bio-free success group was significantly decreased the average dosage of glucocorticoid during the biologics use than that in the bio-free failure group (-3.0 vs 0 mg/day, p=0.01).

Conclusion: We showed that the 1-year discontinuation rate of biologics after achieving low-activity disease status was high (79.1%) in patients with RA being treated in an outpatient setting. A lower DAS28 score at initiation of biologics and decreasing the dose of glucocorticoid before discontinuation of biologics were important factors leading to bio-free success in patients with RA irrespective of biologic type.


Disclosure:

M. Ochiai,
None;

E. Sato,
None;

E. Tanaka,
None;

E. Inoue,
None;

A. Nakajima,
None;

S. Momohara,

Abbvie Japan, Chugai Parmaceutical, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Parma, Takeda Parmaceutical,

8;

A. Taniguchi,
None;

H. Yamanaka,

Abbott, AbbVie, Asahikasei , Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squib, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Santen, Taishotoyama, Takeda, Teijin,

2,

Abbott, AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squib, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda, Teijin,

5,

Abbott, AbbVie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squib, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Pfizer, Takeda, Teijin,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-of-biologics-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-after-achieving-low-activity-disease-status/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology