ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 711

Is the Disease-Specific Lupusqol Sensitive to Changes of Disease Activity in SLE Patients after Treatment of a Flare?

Kathleen McElhone1, Jane Burnell2, Chris Sutton2, Janice Abbott3, Peter Lanyon4, Anisur Rahman5, Chee-Seng Yee6, Mohammed Akil7, Yasmeen Ahmad8, Ian Bruce9, Caroline Gordon10 and Lee-Suan Teh11, 1Rheumatology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, United Kingdom, 2School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom, 3University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom, 4Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 5Centre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 6Department of Rheumatology, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, United Kingdom, 7Sheffield Center Rheumatic Dis, Sheffield South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, 8Department of Rheumatology, Peter Maddison Research Centre, Bangor, United Kingdom, 9Kellgren Centre for Rheum, Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Institution of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Central Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom, 10Rheumatology Research Group, School of Immunity and Infection, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 11Department of Rheumatology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, Quality of life and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Validity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Treatment and Management Studies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

With improving survival in SLE patients, patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an important outcome.  The LupusQoL is a disease-specific patient-derived HRQoL measure with good psychometric properties. The aim of the UK multi-centre LupusQoL Sensitivity Study is to assess whether the LupusQoL is sensitive to change when disease activity improves or deteriorates.

Methods

Patients with SLE (≥ 4 1997 ACR criteria), experiencing a flare (new A or B by BILAG-2004 Index) & requiring an increase in treatment (either prednisolone ≥ 20mg daily, introduction of methotrexate, parenteral steroids, cyclophosphamide &/or biologics) were recruited from 9 UK centres. Assessments were undertaken at baseline & monthly for 9 months after initiation of therapy & included BILAG-2004 disease activity index & the LupusQoL with 8 domains (physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image, fatigue) and scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best HRQoL). Changes in disease activity are defined (see Table – first column) as deterioration: major & minor and improvement: major & minor. Changes in LupusQoL domain scores when disease activity improved, deteriorated or was unchanged between consecutive time-points are reported as mean changes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) constructed using robust standard errors to account for repeated patient assessments.

Results

Mean (SD) age was 40.9 (12.8) & duration since diagnosis was 9.3 (8.1) years for the 101 patients recruited; 94% females, 62.6% white Caucasians, 15.2% south Asians, 8.1% black Caribbean, 4% black Africans, 5% mixed, 1% Chinese. At baseline mean (SD) BILAG2004 score was 16.4 (8.1); all mean LupusQoL domain scores were < 52. LupusQoL physical health, pain & fatigue domain scores increased when BILAG improved (overall, major & minor).  Physical health and pain domain scores decreased when there was a major BILAG deterioration but changes with a minor BILAG deterioration were small and non-significant. The effects of improvements & deterioration in BILAG on the LupusQoL domain scores were smaller or not present (Table).

 

Mean changes in LupusQoL Domain Scores (95% Confidence Intervals) between monthly visits

BILAG change category

(Total npat=100; nobs=724)

Physical health

Pain

Planning

Intimate relationships

Burden to others

Emotional health

Body Image

Fatigue

Major & Minor Deterioration

(npat=73 ;nobs=160)

-0.8

(-3.0 to 1.4)

-2.4

(-5.9 to 1.1)

-1.2

(-3.8 to 1.4)

2.6

(-1.3 to 6.5)

2.3

(-0.6 to 5.2)

-1.1

(-3.5 to 1.3)

0.5

(-2.2 to 3.2)

-1.0

(-3.5 to 1.5)

Major deterioration

(any system to A from B/C/D &/or any 2Bs from C/D)

(npat=32; nobs=43)

-4.9

(-9.4 to -0.4)

-6.9

(-12.9 to -0.8)

-3.0

(-8.2 to 2.1)

4.3

(-6.6 to 15.2)

1.4

(-4.6 to 7.5)

-2.8

(-7.7 to 2.2)

-4.1

(-8.7 to 0.5)

-2.4

(-7.6 to 2.7)

Minor deterioration

(one B from C/D & no new As)

(npat=63; nobs=117)

0.7

(-1.6 to 2.9)

-0.8

(-4.6 to 3.0)

-0.5

(-3.6 to 2.6)

2.0

(-1.5 to 5.5)

2.7

(-0.6 to 5.9)

-0.5

(-3.3 to 2.3)

2.2

(-1.0 to 5.4)

-0.5

(-3.3 to 2.4)

Major & Minor Improvement

(npat=97 ;nobs=199)

 

4.0

(1.9 to 6.1)

7.7

(4.8 to 10.5)

2.6

(0.1 to 5.1)

2.4

(-1.2 to 6.0)

2.4

(-0.1 to 4.8)

3.1

(0.8 to 5.4)

3.1

(0.1 to 6.1)

4.1

(1.7 to 6.5)

Major improvement

(all As to B/C/D &/or all Bs to C/D)

(npat=93; nobs=162)

3.8

(1.3 to 6.3)

7.4

(4.2 to 10.5)

1.8

(-0.9 to 4.6)

2.6

(-1.6 to 6.7)

1.8

(-0.9 to 4.5)

2.7

(0.0 to 5.3)

3.4

(0.2 to 6.6)

3.3

(0.6 to 5.9)

Minor improvement

(all As to B/C/D, some Bs to C/D but 1 persistent B)

(npat24=; nobs=37)

5.0

(0.6 to 9.3)

8.8

(2.2 to 15.5)

5.9

(-1.9 to 13.7)

1.8

(-4.4 to 7.9)

4.9

(-2.1 to 11.9)

5.0

(-0.3 to 10.4)

2.1

(-4.5 to 8.6)

7.8

(2.1 to 13.4)

Persistent active disease

(all As or ≥ 2Bs unchanged)

(npat=57;nobs=127)

-0.9

(-2.7 to 0.9)

-0.9

(-3.6 to 1.7)

0.0

(-1.9 to 1.8)

-2.5

(-6.3 to 1.3)

-1.2

(-4.0 to 1.6)

0.3

(-1.7 to 2.3)

0.6

(-2.0 to 3.2)

2.0

(-0.7 to 4.7)

Persistent inactive disease

(all systems remaining C/D)

(npat=65;nobs=238)

1.6

(0.6 to 2.7)

2.0

(0.5 to 3.5)

2.5

(0.9 to 4.0)

1.8

(-0.8 to 4.5)

4.1

(2.2 to 6.0)

2.3

(1.1 to 3.5)

0.2

(-1.2 to 1.5)

1.7

(0.2 to 3.2)

Conclusion

Improvement and deterioration of LupusQoL domain scores for physical health, pain & fatigue domain scores was seen in patients with significant changes in disease activity over 1 month.  Sensitivity to change of other LupusQoL domains in relation to changes of disease activity may need to be evaluated over a longer interval as the more emotive type of response to the disease & its consequences may be latent and therefore not evident at monthly intervals.


Disclosure:

K. McElhone,
None;

J. Burnell,
None;

C. Sutton,
None;

J. Abbott,
None;

P. Lanyon,
None;

A. Rahman,
None;

C. S. Yee,
None;

M. Akil,
None;

Y. Ahmad,
None;

I. Bruce,
None;

C. Gordon,

GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, Merck Serono, Paraxel and UCB Pharma,

5;

L. S. Teh,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-the-disease-specific-lupusqol-sensitive-to-changes-of-disease-activity-in-sle-patients-after-treatment-of-a-flare/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology