ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 921

Comparison of Infection Rates in Patients Receiving Denosumab, Denosumab and Biologics and Biologics Alone in a Suburban Rheumatology Clinic

Sajina Prabhakaran1 and Charles Pritchard2, 1Drexel Rheumatology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 2Drexel University College of Medicine, Willow Grove, PA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents, denosumab and infection

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease - Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis: Clinical Osteoporosis: Treatment and Safety

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Biologics including rituximab, abatacept and belimumab increase the risk of infection in patients. Denosumab, a RANK-ligand inhibitor used in the treatment of osteoporosis may theoretically make patients more susceptible to infections. RANK is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily so inhibition may cause immunosuppression. One pivotal trial showed an increase in cellulitis and erysipelas in patients on denosumab. We used a retrospective chart review of a patients in a sole specialty rheumatology practice to evaluate the infection rates and hospitalizations of patients on the combination of biologics with denosumab, biologic agents alone, and denosumab alone .

Methods: We reviewed the charts of 136 patients, 50 patients who received biologics only, 50 patients who received denosumab alone and 36 patients who received both simultaneously over the past 4 years. Biologics studied included infliximab, tocilizumab, rituximab, belimumab, abatacept, adalimumab, and golimumab. The primary end-point was to determine if there was a greater risk of infection, hospitalization, complication or discontinuation of biologic and/ or denosumab in the combined group versus the biologic alone. Percentage of incidence was calculated for each group and Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact tests were used for analysis. Relative risks were calculated to compare infection risks between groups.  

Results: There was no difference found in the risk of infection between the groups that received both biologic and denosumab compared to biologic alone, RR = 1.24, 95%, CI: 0.76 -2.04. There were statistically significant increases in the risk of infection in the groups that received both biologic and denosumab compared to the group that received denosumab; RR=7.87, 95% CI: 2.49-24.9 and biologic alone compared to denosumab, RR=6.33, 95% CI 2 – 20.1. Hospitalization rates were higher in the combination group compared to the denosumab (19.4% vs 12%, p=0.038). Statistically significant increases in the risk of infection with increased duration of exposure to biologics (p<0.001) were also noted.

Conclusion: We did not find an increased risk of infection with the combination of denosumab and a biologic compared to a biologic alone. The rates of infection and hospitalization of patients in the combination group were not significantly different between biologic medications.Secondary characteristics also did not affect the compared rates of infection.The duration of exposure to denosumab did not affect the infection rate. There did not seem to be any increased risk of infection in patients on combination non biologic DMARDs and denosumab. In summary this retrospective  small study from a sole specialty rheumatology practice  did not show a statistical  increased risk of infection combining a biologic with denosumab vs a biologic. Hence it appears to be relatively safe to combine denosumab with a biologic agent.


Disclosure:

S. Prabhakaran,
None;

C. Pritchard,

Genetech, Abbvie,

6.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-infection-rates-in-patients-receiving-denosumab-denosumab-and-biologics-and-biologics-alone-in-a-suburban-rheumatology-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology